F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop CPU packet temperatures vary significantly compared to my CPU core temperatures.

CPU packet temperatures vary significantly compared to my CPU core temperatures.

CPU packet temperatures vary significantly compared to my CPU core temperatures.

B
bigTy
Member
160
04-10-2023, 03:29 AM
#1
Your CPU core temperatures match your cooling setup well. At idle they hover around 22-23°C, while the package temps sit in the 45–degree range. I’m puzzled because changing only the Vcore hasn’t affected these readings. The 5.0GHz stable overclock at 1.38V Vcore is functioning properly, with temperatures peaking near 73°C during stress tests. Under load, package temps jump to about 95°C. I’m unsure why this happens and feel uneasy about those high readings. Could running at such high package temperatures be harmful? Why is there such a big difference between core and package temps? Any advice would be appreciated!
B
bigTy
04-10-2023, 03:29 AM #1

Your CPU core temperatures match your cooling setup well. At idle they hover around 22-23°C, while the package temps sit in the 45–degree range. I’m puzzled because changing only the Vcore hasn’t affected these readings. The 5.0GHz stable overclock at 1.38V Vcore is functioning properly, with temperatures peaking near 73°C during stress tests. Under load, package temps jump to about 95°C. I’m unsure why this happens and feel uneasy about those high readings. Could running at such high package temperatures be harmful? Why is there such a big difference between core and package temps? Any advice would be appreciated!

L
50
04-10-2023, 04:54 AM
#2
the idea of keeping the system idle at 20°C seems unlikely unless your setup is unusually cool. most likely, the actual readings come from the packaging rather than the internal components. the 9600k does generate heat, especially at higher voltages, which explains the higher idle temps you mentioned. what cooling methods are you considering?
L
lukestormrider
04-10-2023, 04:54 AM #2

the idea of keeping the system idle at 20°C seems unlikely unless your setup is unusually cool. most likely, the actual readings come from the packaging rather than the internal components. the 9600k does generate heat, especially at higher voltages, which explains the higher idle temps you mentioned. what cooling methods are you considering?

N
NooahFNA
Junior Member
42
04-25-2023, 08:04 AM
#3
Check the system using HWINFO for detailed insights. What other tools or methods do you prefer?
N
NooahFNA
04-25-2023, 08:04 AM #3

Check the system using HWINFO for detailed insights. What other tools or methods do you prefer?

C
ChickenPhoYou
Posting Freak
850
04-27-2023, 01:02 AM
#4
The images appear to originate from hwinfo.
C
ChickenPhoYou
04-27-2023, 01:02 AM #4

The images appear to originate from hwinfo.

K
Kraakka2005
Member
109
05-14-2023, 01:00 AM
#5
The images come from HWinfo. I'm testing a Noctua NH-D15 with two fans. I also have three 120mm intake fans, two 140mm top exhaust fans and one 120mm rear exhaust fan.
K
Kraakka2005
05-14-2023, 01:00 AM #5

The images come from HWinfo. I'm testing a Noctua NH-D15 with two fans. I also have three 120mm intake fans, two 140mm top exhaust fans and one 120mm rear exhaust fan.

C
Criswest7
Junior Member
7
05-15-2023, 04:52 AM
#6
The images come from HWinfo, but I'm checking the actual sensor data. With your setup—two 120mm intake fans, two 140mm top exhaust fans, and one 120mm rear fan—your core temperatures should reflect real airflow and cooling performance. If HWinfo gives misleading readings after you changed the CPU paste, it might be due to thermal lag or incorrect calibration. Double-check sensor placement and ensure the paste improves heat dissipation without overheating components.
C
Criswest7
05-15-2023, 04:52 AM #6

The images come from HWinfo, but I'm checking the actual sensor data. With your setup—two 120mm intake fans, two 140mm top exhaust fans, and one 120mm rear fan—your core temperatures should reflect real airflow and cooling performance. If HWinfo gives misleading readings after you changed the CPU paste, it might be due to thermal lag or incorrect calibration. Double-check sensor placement and ensure the paste improves heat dissipation without overheating components.

I
IPuckFenguins
Senior Member
380
05-22-2023, 04:17 PM
#7
Make the adjustments even more precise.
I
IPuckFenguins
05-22-2023, 04:17 PM #7

Make the adjustments even more precise.

S
SwordzMaster
Junior Member
45
05-24-2023, 03:19 PM
#8
It's almost perfect, though it might be a bit too snug
S
SwordzMaster
05-24-2023, 03:19 PM #8

It's almost perfect, though it might be a bit too snug

T
Tao200
Junior Member
46
05-25-2023, 04:51 AM
#9
It was quite late when I replied. Usually I’d say core temp is the more reliable sensor, but 22-23°C idle doesn’t seem correct unless your ambient is around 10°C. A reading of 95°C under Prime95 at 1.38v feels a bit extreme but not impossible. Could you run a lighter stress test with Cinebnech 15 and Cinebench 20, then let me know what you see?
T
Tao200
05-25-2023, 04:51 AM #9

It was quite late when I replied. Usually I’d say core temp is the more reliable sensor, but 22-23°C idle doesn’t seem correct unless your ambient is around 10°C. A reading of 95°C under Prime95 at 1.38v feels a bit extreme but not impossible. Could you run a lighter stress test with Cinebnech 15 and Cinebench 20, then let me know what you see?