F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Cooling performance at low temperatures with overclocking on a standard cooler

Cooling performance at low temperatures with overclocking on a standard cooler

Cooling performance at low temperatures with overclocking on a standard cooler

J
Jihf_Jr
Member
87
09-17-2025, 03:07 AM
#1
I've increased my AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz 6-core CPU's clock speed to 4.0Ghz using an AMD stock cooler and the ASUS M5A97 R2.0 board. The idle temps are around mid-20s, and during load it stays under 63. Is this normal for my setup? Would investing in a high-end cooler be worthwhile? Thanks in advance ~K
J
Jihf_Jr
09-17-2025, 03:07 AM #1

I've increased my AMD FX-6300 3.5Ghz 6-core CPU's clock speed to 4.0Ghz using an AMD stock cooler and the ASUS M5A97 R2.0 board. The idle temps are around mid-20s, and during load it stays under 63. Is this normal for my setup? Would investing in a high-end cooler be worthwhile? Thanks in advance ~K

M
mcbudder2004
Senior Member
687
09-17-2025, 08:44 AM
#2
I acknowledge I don't have direct experience with AMD CPUs, but I believe that's a bit too much to say. However, I've noticed many people suggesting that AMD Overdrive is the most effective method for monitoring temperatures with FX CPUs.
M
mcbudder2004
09-17-2025, 08:44 AM #2

I acknowledge I don't have direct experience with AMD CPUs, but I believe that's a bit too much to say. However, I've noticed many people suggesting that AMD Overdrive is the most effective method for monitoring temperatures with FX CPUs.

K
kmurray
Member
222
09-25-2025, 02:51 AM
#3
According to IIRC, the temperature sensors in AMD's older CPUs work best at higher temperatures, so load temperatures are the main concern. You should be checking those instead.
K
kmurray
09-25-2025, 02:51 AM #3

According to IIRC, the temperature sensors in AMD's older CPUs work best at higher temperatures, so load temperatures are the main concern. You should be checking those instead.

J
JPV12Vanquish
Member
59
09-25-2025, 03:04 AM
#4
TJ Hooker:
According to what I know, AMD's temperature sensors in their older CPUs work best at higher temperatures. Load temperatures are the ones you need to keep an eye on. What tools are you using for monitoring?
I usually see around 60 on load and rely on CPUID HWmonitor to track all my hardware.
J
JPV12Vanquish
09-25-2025, 03:04 AM #4

TJ Hooker:
According to what I know, AMD's temperature sensors in their older CPUs work best at higher temperatures. Load temperatures are the ones you need to keep an eye on. What tools are you using for monitoring?
I usually see around 60 on load and rely on CPUID HWmonitor to track all my hardware.

C
209
09-27-2025, 11:25 AM
#5
I acknowledge I don't have direct experience with AMD CPUs, yet I believe that might be a bit too optimistic. However, it's acceptable. I've noticed many opinions suggesting that AMD Overdrive is the most effective method for monitoring temperatures with FX processors.
C
CaptainFurioux
09-27-2025, 11:25 AM #5

I acknowledge I don't have direct experience with AMD CPUs, yet I believe that might be a bit too optimistic. However, it's acceptable. I've noticed many opinions suggesting that AMD Overdrive is the most effective method for monitoring temperatures with FX processors.