Considering options for internet access when moving into a new home.
Considering options for internet access when moving into a new home.
I've relied on the Asus RT-AC68U router for six years in an apartment. It handled connecting the whole space well, covering roughly 900 square feet in a rectangular layout, even with over 50 overlapping Wi-Fi signals. Now we’re transitioning to a new home and want consistent connectivity throughout. I’m skeptical that placing the AC68U centrally with four ports in the house and running Ethernet along ceilings won’t improve things much. We need Ethernet access everywhere—living room, office, bedrooms—and full Wi-Fi coverage for mobile devices that aren’t tied to a port. I explored Google Mesh as a short-term fix, but it mainly extends range and may become slow. Keeping the AC68U sounds better, so I’m considering a powered network switch with many ports. I’d run one through the attic (except the living room) and connect it to the router, then use outlet-level ports in rooms where Ethernet is needed. I also thought about Ubiquiti solutions with compact access points, though reaching them on the ceiling of the living room would be challenging. The house has a unique split-level layout—what advice would you suggest? Any details would help clarify your options.
Check if your existing router can handle the connection or if you should upgrade to a more robust solution.
It seems Ubiquiti’s lineup is heavily focused on WiFi 6. Finding a suitable spot for a Dream Machine SE might be tricky. Could you explore other brands or options? I set it up using a Dream Machine SE, a POE 24-port switch, and three access points, bringing the total to nearly $2,000.
Think of an Edge Router X or similar models costing around $100. A POE switch and the necessary access points are all you need for a home setup. I didn’t spend much on wiring my business either. For multi-level homes, just one per level works—two for a two-story house or more if there’s a basement. No need to install one per room. A price of $2000 feels steep unless you’re implementing a full mesh network with APs in every space.
Google Wi-Fi mesh delivers impressive results. Unlike typical range boosters that reduce speed, it employs a powerful, proprietary backhaul and functions as a true mesh network rather than just multiple extenders. I’ve set them up at both my parents’ home and business, and they perform exceptionally well. While running wired connections is ideal, not every device supports cables. A Google mesh system remains a solid choice for broad coverage in an east-to-west setup. I personally manage UniFi hardware, which is more complex and sensitive than Google’s solution. As someone who handles multiple VLANs, I’m comfortable with it, but over the past five years managing three Google Wi-Fi deployments, I’ve experienced minimal problems and consistently high performance.
The Google mesh functions smoothly and operates effectively as described. Performance remains solid. I’ll switch to powerline immediately. Ubiquiti focuses on addressing distinct challenges. It offers strong value and functionality when you can connect a dedicated network cable to each AP/saucer, ensuring optimal Wi-Fi in each coverage area. Mesh technology expands your initial signal range. I’m not a fan of mesh for business environments—it can introduce complications—but it still works well in homes or small offices. The concept of a 'house' varies greatly; it could refer to a spacious residence with thick walls, or a compact space with limited bandwidth needs. If multiple users in each bedroom require high download speeds, the issue shifts dramatically compared to a scenario where only a few devices need basic internet access.
Using mesh devices that have a separate backhaul connection works well when Ethernet isn't reliable. I've had Asus Zen Wi-Fi with speeds of 600-700 Mbps between my base station and the remote site. These setups pass through about three walls and cover 50-60 feet. Adding more nodes should keep you connected to the nearest one. With a dedicated backhaul radio, performance stays consistent without speed drops for each hop like with regular extenders. Also, Mocha 2.5 performs well if your coax is of good quality.