Consider your needs and the devices you use. If speed and connectivity matter, Wifi 6 could be beneficial.
Consider your needs and the devices you use. If speed and connectivity matter, Wifi 6 could be beneficial.
Yes, if you can afford it, go for it. The $1500 Orbi 6E is worth it if you can stretch your budget.
The problem lies in the lack of benchmarks for 6e capabilities. Higher performance models usually offer less range and penetration, which isn’t clear from real-world examples. In my view, a router represents more than just the Wi-Fi standard it employs. The underlying hardware is equally crucial. I’ve noticed many discussions about people with Gigabit or faster connections still managing them, or facing limitations due to outdated firmware. Occasionally, third-party firmware can help, though not all routers support it. Similar issues existed with AC technology when it launched. WiFi 6 devices will become more affordable over time, just like any tech. The advantage of waiting is potential cost savings and improved features as the technology evolves.
When 802.11ac launched, it appeared on enterprise access points that are still in production today and remain available at the same price point. Consumer devices followed later, as expectations suggested lower costs, though on a similar scale they were roughly twice the price of comparable 802.11n equipment. With 802.11ax, such high-end gear hasn't fully materialized yet, so most activity centers on consumer products. The limited price reduction stems from the fact that chip manufacturing already reflects its cost, and antenna design along with PCB intricacy remain fixed in terms of complexity and material use.
I don't agree. When WiFi 5 launched, none of the equipment was under $100. Now you can purchase a solid WiFi 5 router for around $80 and a much cheaper alternative. The same applies to WiFi 4—just a matter of time. Enterprise Gear doesn't really reflect fair pricing either; companies often manipulate prices for their own benefit.
I should have been more precise: WiFi 5 has remained stable in terms of performance and reliability since its launch. Most affordable routers supporting 802.11ac fall short of expectations, making 802.11n a better choice for similar budgets. Early 802.11ac devices were solid consumer options, and beyond their discontinuation for parts, they still hold value. A $200 router when it first came out is comparable to today’s $190–$200 models. Businesses aren’t disadvantaged; their total cost of ownership includes longer-lasting hardware, warranties, and licensing for advanced features. Also, remember that MSRP doesn’t reflect the true cost businesses actually face—it’s designed for consumers. There’s a significant margin built into the price to attract customers and fund additional services. Over the equipment’s lifespan, enterprise-grade WiFi delivers comparable profit margins to manufacturers, though exceptions like BlueCoat exist.
The TP Link Archer C7 fits in the under $100 range and works well. It's not meant for power users, but it handles tasks adequately. Both its range and speed performed satisfactorily. I'm certain of this since I installed it for my sister, who was pleased with its results. It clearly outperformed the wireless N router they had. I've noticed many recommendations for sub $100 devices that offer solid performance.