Consider your needs and preferences. If you want quieter performance, turning it off might be better.
Consider your needs and preferences. If you want quieter performance, turning it off might be better.
Check the BIOS for "AMD Cool n' Quiet" settings. Enable it if you want lower clock speeds and voltage when not in use, as it can help save power. It won’t directly affect your Cinebench score but may contribute to longer CPU life by reducing heat. Avoid turning it off unless you notice instability.
I’d keep it for myself unless something impacts your results. Reducing the heat overall would help—less power needed and quieter operation… definitely worth it.
For a reason it was turned on, it messes with overclocking. It sometimes drops to 1550MHz and freezes, which only works by restarting. But the CPU is always running at full speed.
It mainly reduces the clock speeds on your CPU when not required. It's totally worth it, though if it interferes with overclocking, turning it off might shorten its lifespan (just a little). You'll also notice your coolers getting louder. If you're looking for an OC guide for FX series, check out Jayztwocents' resource.
It has been a common trait in processors for a long time, making it seem like a standard part of design rather than something optional. This characteristic could affect stability, particularly when operating near the limits of your power budget. A rapid transition from low to high states might cause an immediate surge beyond what stable operation can handle. Perhaps adjusting the minimum clock speed closer to the boost frequency could help reduce such spikes. This would manifest as increased current when voltage remains steady, which is typical behavior. In AMD Adrenaline graphics software, there are controls for minimum and maximum boost clocks, and some tutorials suggest pushing the minimum near the maximum boost. I believe setting the minimum in sync with the DDR speed and the infinity fabric—especially in paired mode—can be beneficial. For example, if your CPU runs at a 1800 MHz fabric clock with a 3600 MHz DDR4, raising the graphics minimum to 900, 1800, 2700, or even 3600 could improve performance, particularly when using VRAM and Smart-Access memory that allows the CPU to access GPU RAM. I’m not certain about the exact benefits but think it would help. Similarly, AMD’s Cool and Quiet function, which manages clock scaling, seems designed for power efficiency but might cause instability during ramp-up. Reducing the ramp distance could prevent issues, though it may limit headroom if the GPU draws more power during transitions. Currently, GPUs can experience significant power spikes—sometimes doubling their consumption from 300W to 600W. CPUs also tend to increase power when they spike, potentially drawing excessive current and risking shutdown due to over-current protection.