F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Connecting networks across structures (distance 500 meters)

Connecting networks across structures (distance 500 meters)

Connecting networks across structures (distance 500 meters)

S
schlonger
Junior Member
9
01-03-2023, 05:35 AM
#1
Hello once more, I’m looking for inputs and guidance to organize this project. We’ve just installed a storage unit on our land, and internet access is essential. The distance makes running copper cables impractical, so fiber seems the best choice. (Left side = house. Right side = storage unit) Key points: * Need 500m length with 1-2 access points for basic use (like searching manuals) * Require 3-6 cameras for surveillance – streams must go back to the house because the NVR won’t be in the storage unit * Need 10GbE capable fiber, which is future-proof even if current gear can’t handle it yet * Want to extend the setup to neighboring homes if needed. Inside the building, expect limited internet use, possibly for farm equipment, vehicles, or tools. The structure will include a small rack, fiber patch, Ethernet ports, and an 8-port PoE switch. I’ve reviewed some options: media converter, 110mm tubing for shielding, OM5 multimode fiber (up to 400m?). Should I go with blowing the fiber in? Does single-mode fiber guarantee unlimited bandwidth and solve capacity issues? What’s the proper method for this, as a professional solution? What’s the most affordable way, either DIY or hiring help? The budget is broad since this isn’t a cheap job. Once the trench is ready, we’ll also install a thick power cable since the site lacks sufficient electricity.* I’m also curious about a budget-friendly approach and whether a media converter from a search result fits the bill.
S
schlonger
01-03-2023, 05:35 AM #1

Hello once more, I’m looking for inputs and guidance to organize this project. We’ve just installed a storage unit on our land, and internet access is essential. The distance makes running copper cables impractical, so fiber seems the best choice. (Left side = house. Right side = storage unit) Key points: * Need 500m length with 1-2 access points for basic use (like searching manuals) * Require 3-6 cameras for surveillance – streams must go back to the house because the NVR won’t be in the storage unit * Need 10GbE capable fiber, which is future-proof even if current gear can’t handle it yet * Want to extend the setup to neighboring homes if needed. Inside the building, expect limited internet use, possibly for farm equipment, vehicles, or tools. The structure will include a small rack, fiber patch, Ethernet ports, and an 8-port PoE switch. I’ve reviewed some options: media converter, 110mm tubing for shielding, OM5 multimode fiber (up to 400m?). Should I go with blowing the fiber in? Does single-mode fiber guarantee unlimited bandwidth and solve capacity issues? What’s the proper method for this, as a professional solution? What’s the most affordable way, either DIY or hiring help? The budget is broad since this isn’t a cheap job. Once the trench is ready, we’ll also install a thick power cable since the site lacks sufficient electricity.* I’m also curious about a budget-friendly approach and whether a media converter from a search result fits the bill.

C
CoolCow247
Member
105
01-07-2023, 08:12 PM
#2
Ubiquiti offers strong wireless connections that work well for monitoring purposes. We encounter no problems using them.
C
CoolCow247
01-07-2023, 08:12 PM #2

Ubiquiti offers strong wireless connections that work well for monitoring purposes. We encounter no problems using them.

Y
yoonjos
Junior Member
1
01-19-2023, 08:55 AM
#3
I’ll switch to single mode for lower costs, then you can achieve over 1TB/s with this cable. Consider purchasing fiber from fs.com like the one shown here for the desired length. I’m looking at https://www.fs.com/products/29607.html – it’s rated for outdoor use and includes a few fibers so losing one or two still keeps the connection functional. For budget options, an LC patch cable around $20 works well for basic OS2 setups. A switch with SPF ports is also affordable and reduces complexity. Cheap point-to-point Wi-Fi should also be fine. One from MikroTik is available here: https://mikrotik.com/product/lhg_2 – it’s inexpensive and straightforward to install if you have a clear line of sight.
Y
yoonjos
01-19-2023, 08:55 AM #3

I’ll switch to single mode for lower costs, then you can achieve over 1TB/s with this cable. Consider purchasing fiber from fs.com like the one shown here for the desired length. I’m looking at https://www.fs.com/products/29607.html – it’s rated for outdoor use and includes a few fibers so losing one or two still keeps the connection functional. For budget options, an LC patch cable around $20 works well for basic OS2 setups. A switch with SPF ports is also affordable and reduces complexity. Cheap point-to-point Wi-Fi should also be fine. One from MikroTik is available here: https://mikrotik.com/product/lhg_2 – it’s inexpensive and straightforward to install if you have a clear line of sight.

P
Pickmaster12
Senior Member
710
01-19-2023, 04:23 PM
#4
This is likely the optimal solution.
P
Pickmaster12
01-19-2023, 04:23 PM #4

This is likely the optimal solution.

T
Thesnake9
Member
160
01-20-2023, 10:21 AM
#5
If you prefer a fiber link, MM can handle it effectively, yet SM offers broader speed choices across longer distances. I’ve observed that SM modules are generally pricier on Cisco and HP switches. Using a copper-to-fiber converter works, but black-box SM units aren’t cheap and add another point of potential failure. A managed switch with versatile network ports and matching SFP modules would be best at each end—though it comes at a higher cost. If you run cables through conduits or similar, pre-terminated cables need extra handling to avoid damage; wrapping the end before installation is advisable. Alternatively, consider hiring someone if you’re unsure about termination. Honestly, for your setup, a P2P wireless bridge would be the most cost-effective solution, delivering solid speeds over long ranges for around $125 each side. It’s straightforward to install and set up, with minimal hassle. Looks like an interesting project!
T
Thesnake9
01-20-2023, 10:21 AM #5

If you prefer a fiber link, MM can handle it effectively, yet SM offers broader speed choices across longer distances. I’ve observed that SM modules are generally pricier on Cisco and HP switches. Using a copper-to-fiber converter works, but black-box SM units aren’t cheap and add another point of potential failure. A managed switch with versatile network ports and matching SFP modules would be best at each end—though it comes at a higher cost. If you run cables through conduits or similar, pre-terminated cables need extra handling to avoid damage; wrapping the end before installation is advisable. Alternatively, consider hiring someone if you’re unsure about termination. Honestly, for your setup, a P2P wireless bridge would be the most cost-effective solution, delivering solid speeds over long ranges for around $125 each side. It’s straightforward to install and set up, with minimal hassle. Looks like an interesting project!