Connect remotely through your router without needing a desktop.
Connect remotely through your router without needing a desktop.
Hi everyone, I’m trying to figure out the right setup for two desktops in the same building. I want them to be wireless so we can access them from downstairs without using Teamviewer, which often drops unexpectedly. Ideally, I’d add local routers and connect monitors, keyboards, and mice through one or two routers—each computer gets its own peripheral. This would make remote access smoother and more reliable. I’ve been using Teamviewer and Anydesk for a year now, but they’re not stable on local networks. I’m considering moving the desktops to a better spot with a switch and UPS, so users can connect via the router instead of climbing stairs or relying on unstable connections. I’m not sure what product name fits this setup, but I’d really appreciate any recommendations. Thanks!
Let me try to understand. You want a keyboard & mouse that connects to a router and send the keystroke and cursor movement to this other machine? How would you plan to view the monitor? Before you answer that I don't believe you'll find any easy solution on the market that does this without you having to write the code yourself. That type of product isn't really a thing. If the two machines are on the same LAN you can give VNC Viewer w/ TightVNC a shot. The screen may turn black periodically due to lost packets but the TCP side of things are pretty stable at keeping the session going. If you get frequent disconnects you may want to test the reliability of your network. If you need remote access (from the Internet) then you have even less options. Perhaps someone can offer another KVM solution. I know Google has one. Forgot the name of it.
Hey there, thanks for the update. Basically, I've noticed some setups where the desktop isn't visible and remote connections are made nearby. It seems like a specific router setup—maybe a standard one with video and USB ports. I’ve seen this before but not entirely clear on how it functions. In Australia, certain government agencies use something similar. I’m open to trying it out; I just need either a stable connection or a quick setup. Sometimes I have to restart the whole computer because of problems with tools like AnyDesk or TeamViewer. It’s frustrating when you’re trying to speed things up and TeamViewer has authentication issues, even though the rest of the network works fine. I’ve looked it up, and KMV looks like a match, but I’m not sure.
You require an IP KVM solution that allows network connectivity. It enables direct desktop control and switching, with full BIOS access capabilities.
It appears you're using a device that combines a computer and a router. You might want to reassess your workflow setup. There will always be some data loss, and if it affects remote sessions like Teamviewer or other access tools, the reliability isn't assured. Even with encryption, a KVM session remains vulnerable. Your approach depends on whether you rely more on a graphical interface or file transfers. If file transfers are key, alternatives like SSH or SFTP could help. Sessions may still disconnect, but with reduced overhead they might perform better.
In short, the software costs are high and it’s currently limited to one user at a time. I’m collaborating with a developer to build our own solution, trim the unnecessary parts, and add only what we need. That’s not far off yet. Right now, we’re working on one eCommerce store per computer. When you say drop out, I just reconnect—mainly using TeamViewer, which sometimes drops connections for a while but usually works fine afterward. It’s mostly text input, no files involved.
I'd verify the stability of an SSH link and if it consistently works, I'd search for a CLI alternative to your app and deploy it on a Linux host. Currently, your setup depends heavily on network conditions in your region. Even with KVM, packet loss remains inevitable—only the app's handling of interruptions can be adjusted. Unless you wish to modify your existing workflow, you might consider other KVM alternatives. I came across Google's Chrome Remote Desktop option. I tested it once; it functioned adequately but I haven't confirmed its reliability for extended use. Feel free to explore it if you're interested. Good luck with the devices you're considering.