F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Connect gadgets to two linked local area networks.

Connect gadgets to two linked local area networks.

Connect gadgets to two linked local area networks.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
Taybaybay
Posting Freak
850
02-08-2016, 08:18 PM
#1
I'm using a Google Mesh network connected to my Nighthawk router. It's meant for low-priority devices that usually don't reach the router directly. This setup causes devices on the Nighthawk to miss those on the Mesh, and vice versa. For instance, my PC linked to the Nighthawk can't detect the printers in the Mesh, and the living room TV can't see my media server. When configuring the Mesh, it defaults to mesh mode instead of bridge mode, preventing me from setting it up as a bridge from the Nighthawk. That's why I end up with two separate networks.
T
Taybaybay
02-08-2016, 08:18 PM #1

I'm using a Google Mesh network connected to my Nighthawk router. It's meant for low-priority devices that usually don't reach the router directly. This setup causes devices on the Nighthawk to miss those on the Mesh, and vice versa. For instance, my PC linked to the Nighthawk can't detect the printers in the Mesh, and the living room TV can't see my media server. When configuring the Mesh, it defaults to mesh mode instead of bridge mode, preventing me from setting it up as a bridge from the Nighthawk. That's why I end up with two separate networks.

J
Junior2161
Junior Member
23
02-11-2016, 01:25 PM
#2
J
Junior2161
02-11-2016, 01:25 PM #2

G
GaZeVII
Member
141
02-11-2016, 02:54 PM
#3
Reset the Google Mesh network completely and set it up as a bridge so it gets IP addresses from your Netgear router within the same DHCP subnet. Or choose to stick with a single network. I get why you need the Nighthawk—most available models are either too expensive or lack strong admin features and wired connections.
G
GaZeVII
02-11-2016, 02:54 PM #3

Reset the Google Mesh network completely and set it up as a bridge so it gets IP addresses from your Netgear router within the same DHCP subnet. Or choose to stick with a single network. I get why you need the Nighthawk—most available models are either too expensive or lack strong admin features and wired connections.

P
Petseal812
Junior Member
24
02-11-2016, 05:22 PM
#4
I attempted a factory reset of the mesh, but it didn’t let me choose the bridge option—it forced me into mesh mode. Additionally, I couldn’t switch between networks; the mesh was triggered due to dead zones.
P
Petseal812
02-11-2016, 05:22 PM #4

I attempted a factory reset of the mesh, but it didn’t let me choose the bridge option—it forced me into mesh mode. Additionally, I couldn’t switch between networks; the mesh was triggered due to dead zones.

K
Kitten645321
Member
181
02-12-2016, 01:00 AM
#5
This situation isn't feasible. We need three systems with hard wiring.
K
Kitten645321
02-12-2016, 01:00 AM #5

This situation isn't feasible. We need three systems with hard wiring.

G
GeekVSNerd
Junior Member
22
02-12-2016, 08:10 AM
#6
Ensure each access point has a hardwired Ethernet port. Then link a physical network switch to them for additional wired connections where needed.
G
GeekVSNerd
02-12-2016, 08:10 AM #6

Ensure each access point has a hardwired Ethernet port. Then link a physical network switch to them for additional wired connections where needed.

T
TommyTheLommy
Posting Freak
846
02-13-2016, 12:43 AM
#7
Mesh offers significantly reduced wireless performance compared to the Nighthawk. It's better to manage network changes than to sacrifice speed.
T
TommyTheLommy
02-13-2016, 12:43 AM #7

Mesh offers significantly reduced wireless performance compared to the Nighthawk. It's better to manage network changes than to sacrifice speed.

P
Prisma907
Member
63
02-23-2016, 09:22 AM
#8
Determine which device is nearer to your modem by swapping one router for another or using a switch. This will remove the double NAT and let everything communicate directly.
P
Prisma907
02-23-2016, 09:22 AM #8

Determine which device is nearer to your modem by swapping one router for another or using a switch. This will remove the double NAT and let everything communicate directly.

A
AnnieDreams_
Member
67
02-23-2016, 10:07 AM
#9
There’s no way to set up DNS or DHCP between the two devices for communication. Dropping either isn’t possible. Each model serves a unique purpose, and removing one would cause more disruption than simply changing networks on demand.
A
AnnieDreams_
02-23-2016, 10:07 AM #9

There’s no way to set up DNS or DHCP between the two devices for communication. Dropping either isn’t possible. Each model serves a unique purpose, and removing one would cause more disruption than simply changing networks on demand.

G
GameBoosh
Senior Member
470
03-02-2016, 09:14 AM
#10
DNS and DHCP aren't the solution. You actually need to turn off the router completely. The device that's farther from the modem network should be set to bridged mode, enabling it to function as an AP or switch so connected devices can communicate with each other through other routers.
G
GameBoosh
03-02-2016, 09:14 AM #10

DNS and DHCP aren't the solution. You actually need to turn off the router completely. The device that's farther from the modem network should be set to bridged mode, enabling it to function as an AP or switch so connected devices can communicate with each other through other routers.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next