comparison of stock versus overclock performance
comparison of stock versus overclock performance
The performance improvement you'll experience depends on various factors, but the video suggests a significant boost, around 30%. This is what the creator mentioned in their YouTube video.
On what and with what?
Unclear where those figures came from...
Ryzen at 3.2Ghz? The base speed? It doesn’t seem like a simple overclock from 3.2Ghz to 3.9Ghz. Most Ryzen models already reach around 3.7Ghz, and top models go up to 3.9Ghz. This likely isn’t the newest generation that could hit 4.2–4.3Ghz.
GPU performance around 1830–2030Mhz is more believable, though it probably exceeded 1830Mhz from the beginning.
Memory up to 2400Mhz or 2666Mhz is a small increase, but with Ryzen it would have made a noticeable difference. The real issue is they should have been targeting 3000Mhz or higher from the start.
On what and with what?
Unclear where those figures came from...
Ryzen at 3.2Ghz? The base speed? It doesn’t seem like a straightforward overclock from 3.2Ghz to 3.9Ghz... I believe the standard boost on most Ryzen chips is around 3.7Ghz, and top models already reach 3.9Ghz. This likely isn’t the newest generation that can hit 4.2–4.3Ghz.
1830-2030Mhz on the GPU is more believable, though it probably exceeded 1830Mhz from the beginning.
Memory speed jumping from 2400Mhz to 2666Mhz is only a small change, but with Ryzen it would have made a noticeable difference. The issue here is they should have been targeting 3000Mhz or higher right away.