F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing thermal paste options: NT-H1 and Arctic Silver 5.

Comparing thermal paste options: NT-H1 and Arctic Silver 5.

Comparing thermal paste options: NT-H1 and Arctic Silver 5.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
B
Bryannnnn
Junior Member
Find
15
10-12-2016, 06:07 AM
#11
Considering only the requested thread's findings. Here’s the summary table:
Reply
Reply
B
Bryannnnn
10-12-2016, 06:07 AM #11

Considering only the requested thread's findings. Here’s the summary table:

Reply
Reply
N
npalmen
Member
Find
202
10-14-2016, 03:42 PM
#12
Begin by sharing verified feedback from trusted sources, then we can discuss further.
Reply
Reply
N
npalmen
10-14-2016, 03:42 PM #12

Begin by sharing verified feedback from trusted sources, then we can discuss further.

Reply
Reply
H
HERVVEHH
Member
Find
69
10-16-2016, 09:35 PM
#13
Interesting find there.
Reply
Reply
H
HERVVEHH
10-16-2016, 09:35 PM #13

Interesting find there.

Reply
Reply
E
Evolution88
Member
Find
216
10-18-2016, 06:20 PM
#14
Useless results. Conditions varied—no ambient data provided. Gelid, ICD, AC2, and Liquid Ultra weren’t present. It was close, but not great. The main issue was NT-H1 performance. Please try again. Also, check if the heatsink was properly lapped and if there was an application layer before and after. You can find more details in the thread I linked.
Reply
Reply
E
Evolution88
10-18-2016, 06:20 PM #14

Useless results. Conditions varied—no ambient data provided. Gelid, ICD, AC2, and Liquid Ultra weren’t present. It was close, but not great. The main issue was NT-H1 performance. Please try again. Also, check if the heatsink was properly lapped and if there was an application layer before and after. You can find more details in the thread I linked.

Reply
Reply
J
JVurso
Junior Member
Find
6
10-18-2016, 08:15 PM
#15
I used both MX-4 and Gelid GC Extreme. In my configuration (i7 4790K @ 4.7GHz with H105), the performance difference is about 1-2°C under stress tests. That's not a major issue.
Reply
Reply
J
JVurso
10-18-2016, 08:15 PM #15

I used both MX-4 and Gelid GC Extreme. In my configuration (i7 4790K @ 4.7GHz with H105), the performance difference is about 1-2°C under stress tests. That's not a major issue.

Reply
Reply
M
Marijntje
Member
Find
149
10-22-2016, 12:17 PM
#16
I couldn't locate such detailed information quickly. I've reviewed multiple tests, but they consistently highlight that high-end non-conductive thermal compounds rarely exceed a 2-3°C difference, while conductive pastes tend to be slightly cooler.
Reply
Reply
M
Marijntje
10-22-2016, 12:17 PM #16

I couldn't locate such detailed information quickly. I've reviewed multiple tests, but they consistently highlight that high-end non-conductive thermal compounds rarely exceed a 2-3°C difference, while conductive pastes tend to be slightly cooler.

Reply
Reply
L
Ladelichou
Member
Find
63
10-22-2016, 08:15 PM
#17
Absolutely, I'm here to help. It sounds like you had a great time with me. I made sure your account was updated just in case. My toolset includes everything you need—secure hex keys included. D2Ultima, thanks for the confirmation! Perfectly suited for any system, whether it's powerful or not.
Reply
Reply
L
Ladelichou
10-22-2016, 08:15 PM #17

Absolutely, I'm here to help. It sounds like you had a great time with me. I made sure your account was updated just in case. My toolset includes everything you need—secure hex keys included. D2Ultima, thanks for the confirmation! Perfectly suited for any system, whether it's powerful or not.

Reply
Reply
Pages (2): Previous 1 2