F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing the two setups helps determine if the upgrade is beneficial.

Comparing the two setups helps determine if the upgrade is beneficial.

Comparing the two setups helps determine if the upgrade is beneficial.

M
MineFloYT
Member
190
02-23-2016, 06:26 PM
#1
Yes, you’d likely see a noticeable upgrade from 16GB to 32GB by 2024. Gaming performance would improve significantly with the extra memory, especially for demanding titles. Your current setup is solid, but adding more RAM can enhance multitasking and overall responsiveness.
M
MineFloYT
02-23-2016, 06:26 PM #1

Yes, you’d likely see a noticeable upgrade from 16GB to 32GB by 2024. Gaming performance would improve significantly with the extra memory, especially for demanding titles. Your current setup is solid, but adding more RAM can enhance multitasking and overall responsiveness.

B
Bowling_Beast
Member
200
02-25-2016, 02:12 AM
#2
From 16 to 32 is possible and you can handle more tasks. Games require a lot of memory; 16 GB is the bare minimum but 32 is often better. Increasing the frequency is another option, though it depends on the game—some modern titles prefer higher RAM speeds, but results can vary.
B
Bowling_Beast
02-25-2016, 02:12 AM #2

From 16 to 32 is possible and you can handle more tasks. Games require a lot of memory; 16 GB is the bare minimum but 32 is often better. Increasing the frequency is another option, though it depends on the game—some modern titles prefer higher RAM speeds, but results can vary.

B
bruinsmap
Junior Member
30
02-27-2016, 12:05 PM
#3
It varies based on your routine and the titles you enjoy. Starting your PC, running a moderately light game for a short while, then turning it off might not be enough. Some games demand more power, particularly during extended play (like strategy, world-building, simulation, or MMOs), and you might observe slow performance—such as lagging, difficulty pressing ALT+TAB, or stuttering when loading/unloading scenes.
B
bruinsmap
02-27-2016, 12:05 PM #3

It varies based on your routine and the titles you enjoy. Starting your PC, running a moderately light game for a short while, then turning it off might not be enough. Some games demand more power, particularly during extended play (like strategy, world-building, simulation, or MMOs), and you might observe slow performance—such as lagging, difficulty pressing ALT+TAB, or stuttering when loading/unloading scenes.

M
masond2
Junior Member
18
02-29-2016, 11:06 PM
#4
board? cpu? for both your system and GFS system 3200c16 and 3600c18 are the only suitable DDR4 XMP options. Set and forget with just one click, no extra tuning needed. The 4000c18 doesn’t add much value unless you’re targeting higher speeds—otherwise, stick with the 16GbE revision B or 8GbE DDR and Micron DJR. Even if you opt for one of those models, running it at XMP won’t be worthwhile unless you’re pushing into the 5000MHz range. Unless you’re aiming for top frequency, dual-rank and higher clock speeds are better. For Ryzen processors, performance is solid around 3800MHz; below that, consider the 4GbE D die which is more reliable. If tuned well, these should beat Dual-Rank as well. Overall, they’re decent choices for your setup, but keep in mind the other options are mainly for overclocking or specific use cases.
M
masond2
02-29-2016, 11:06 PM #4

board? cpu? for both your system and GFS system 3200c16 and 3600c18 are the only suitable DDR4 XMP options. Set and forget with just one click, no extra tuning needed. The 4000c18 doesn’t add much value unless you’re targeting higher speeds—otherwise, stick with the 16GbE revision B or 8GbE DDR and Micron DJR. Even if you opt for one of those models, running it at XMP won’t be worthwhile unless you’re pushing into the 5000MHz range. Unless you’re aiming for top frequency, dual-rank and higher clock speeds are better. For Ryzen processors, performance is solid around 3800MHz; below that, consider the 4GbE D die which is more reliable. If tuned well, these should beat Dual-Rank as well. Overall, they’re decent choices for your setup, but keep in mind the other options are mainly for overclocking or specific use cases.

P
pidies
Member
151
03-02-2016, 11:51 AM
#5
Even in 2030, as long as your system has enough memory, you’re still getting everything you need.
P
pidies
03-02-2016, 11:51 AM #5

Even in 2030, as long as your system has enough memory, you’re still getting everything you need.

H
heyitsjackson
Member
170
03-03-2016, 06:12 AM
#6
Side note: The 4000MHz CL18 could be out of reach depending on the CPU and motherboard specs. With the i9-9900K it seems achievable on a solid board. Probably won’t stand out much. For Am4, jumping from 2400MHz to 3200Mhz offers a noticeable boost, but climbing to 3200Mhz then to 3700Mhz adds little value. Do you require 32GB for gaming? Not immediately, but it won’t be an issue soon. @podkall There was a game that came with its suggested specs—roughly a Ryzen 9 5950X and 32GB RAM for ultra 1400p. That’s more than what a RTX3060ti can handle as a GPU.
H
heyitsjackson
03-03-2016, 06:12 AM #6

Side note: The 4000MHz CL18 could be out of reach depending on the CPU and motherboard specs. With the i9-9900K it seems achievable on a solid board. Probably won’t stand out much. For Am4, jumping from 2400MHz to 3200Mhz offers a noticeable boost, but climbing to 3200Mhz then to 3700Mhz adds little value. Do you require 32GB for gaming? Not immediately, but it won’t be an issue soon. @podkall There was a game that came with its suggested specs—roughly a Ryzen 9 5950X and 32GB RAM for ultra 1400p. That’s more than what a RTX3060ti can handle as a GPU.

T
TempLate_YT
Senior Member
424
03-05-2016, 06:17 AM
#7
Improving just because a game needs more than your computer can handle isn't a proper excuse
T
TempLate_YT
03-05-2016, 06:17 AM #7

Improving just because a game needs more than your computer can handle isn't a proper excuse

X
xX_Squig_Xx
Member
55
03-05-2016, 07:01 AM
#8
It points to the future with multiple upcoming titles. The current reference is Civilization VII. Another example would be Microsoft flight simulator 2024 when using the suggested graphics options: https://www.flightsimulator.com/microsof...-2024-faq/
X
xX_Squig_Xx
03-05-2016, 07:01 AM #8

It points to the future with multiple upcoming titles. The current reference is Civilization VII. Another example would be Microsoft flight simulator 2024 when using the suggested graphics options: https://www.flightsimulator.com/microsof...-2024-faq/

D
Dynabide
Junior Member
30
03-06-2016, 01:57 AM
#9
Thanks for your response. Based on your setup—a 13600KF with Z690 M.2 slot and a B550M Ryzen 7 5700X3D—your conclusion seems solid. No need to upgrade RAM unless you have specific performance needs.
D
Dynabide
03-06-2016, 01:57 AM #9

Thanks for your response. Based on your setup—a 13600KF with Z690 M.2 slot and a B550M Ryzen 7 5700X3D—your conclusion seems solid. No need to upgrade RAM unless you have specific performance needs.

A
agarmor
Member
223
03-06-2016, 09:33 AM
#10
It doesn’t resemble future performance as long as memory isn’t exhausted. When RAM runs low, the system shifts tasks to disk, which is much slower—even with an SSD—leading to reduced frame rates or minor stutters. This issue arises only if memory overflows.
A
agarmor
03-06-2016, 09:33 AM #10

It doesn’t resemble future performance as long as memory isn’t exhausted. When RAM runs low, the system shifts tasks to disk, which is much slower—even with an SSD—leading to reduced frame rates or minor stutters. This issue arises only if memory overflows.