F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing the two models highlights their distinct features and capabilities.

Comparing the two models highlights their distinct features and capabilities.

Comparing the two models highlights their distinct features and capabilities.

L
LittleRaddish
Junior Member
3
06-26-2016, 07:27 AM
#1
What do you think? The Intel 9980XE still feels a bit faster, just a tiny margin. I’m curious about how much the 10980XE can be upgraded and whether the new power plan for Ryzen will make a difference. I’m also wondering what the 4000 series will deliver.
L
LittleRaddish
06-26-2016, 07:27 AM #1

What do you think? The Intel 9980XE still feels a bit faster, just a tiny margin. I’m curious about how much the 10980XE can be upgraded and whether the new power plan for Ryzen will make a difference. I’m also wondering what the 4000 series will deliver.

H
Heroteddy
Member
203
07-03-2016, 09:35 PM
#2
You didn't see Linus' video? Intel might need years to keep up. /s The 10980XE could improve more than the 9980XE if Intel actually made changes beyond just the name. So in theory, it'd be a bit better than the 3950X, but only independent reviews will say for sure.
H
Heroteddy
07-03-2016, 09:35 PM #2

You didn't see Linus' video? Intel might need years to keep up. /s The 10980XE could improve more than the 9980XE if Intel actually made changes beyond just the name. So in theory, it'd be a bit better than the 3950X, but only independent reviews will say for sure.

A
ariel_8888
Member
214
07-08-2016, 12:04 AM
#3
The data only indicated that the overclocked 7960X and 9980XE outperformed a standard 3950X, yet the stock 7980XE consistently underperformed across all charts in this video. The 10980XE remains a 14nm+ improvement but offers no substantial IPC gains, just a minor clock increase. I anticipate it will also lag behind Ryzen models.
A
ariel_8888
07-08-2016, 12:04 AM #3

The data only indicated that the overclocked 7960X and 9980XE outperformed a standard 3950X, yet the stock 7980XE consistently underperformed across all charts in this video. The 10980XE remains a 14nm+ improvement but offers no substantial IPC gains, just a minor clock increase. I anticipate it will also lag behind Ryzen models.

P
PaigeyPoodles
Member
101
07-09-2016, 07:51 PM
#4
on another posted I mentioned this to you about the 3950X going toe to toe with the upcoming 10980XE probably but at $250 less and on a consumer platform. If you need more PCIe lanes just wait for TR 3000. But as I remember you said your applications simply aren't optimized for AMD? Sad since the 3900 and 3950X are killer chips pre ordered a 3950X and I am putting it in a 13L NCase M1 w/ only a 240mm AIO since OptimumTech successfully did the same build, which is insane since my prior setup of a 18.5L Sliger Cerberus with a X399M 2950X could be barley be cooled with a custom loop. Which brings up another point, even if the 10980XE is the better chip marginally it requires a large socket HEDT motherboard and at least a 360 AIO or custom loop. For me personally I only build SFF so this automatically rules the chip out
P
PaigeyPoodles
07-09-2016, 07:51 PM #4

on another posted I mentioned this to you about the 3950X going toe to toe with the upcoming 10980XE probably but at $250 less and on a consumer platform. If you need more PCIe lanes just wait for TR 3000. But as I remember you said your applications simply aren't optimized for AMD? Sad since the 3900 and 3950X are killer chips pre ordered a 3950X and I am putting it in a 13L NCase M1 w/ only a 240mm AIO since OptimumTech successfully did the same build, which is insane since my prior setup of a 18.5L Sliger Cerberus with a X399M 2950X could be barley be cooled with a custom loop. Which brings up another point, even if the 10980XE is the better chip marginally it requires a large socket HEDT motherboard and at least a 360 AIO or custom loop. For me personally I only build SFF so this automatically rules the chip out

L
levikillerk13
Junior Member
48
07-09-2016, 08:36 PM
#5
Your inquiry highlights AMD's strong stance. The 10980XE is a more costly chip that also needs an HEDT board to operate. Your overall expense with AMD is likely $300–$400 lower. That suggests AMD is the obvious choice unless you require HEDT capabilities such as additional PCIe lanes or quad channel RAM.
L
levikillerk13
07-09-2016, 08:36 PM #5

Your inquiry highlights AMD's strong stance. The 10980XE is a more costly chip that also needs an HEDT board to operate. Your overall expense with AMD is likely $300–$400 lower. That suggests AMD is the obvious choice unless you require HEDT capabilities such as additional PCIe lanes or quad channel RAM.

M
MattHaan
Member
131
07-09-2016, 09:05 PM
#6
I own an X299 EVGA Dark board with extensive cooling setup. There are two 2080 Tis graphics cards, several add-on cards, and multiple NVMe drives. Additional PCI-E lanes would be beneficial.
M
MattHaan
07-09-2016, 09:05 PM #6

I own an X299 EVGA Dark board with extensive cooling setup. There are two 2080 Tis graphics cards, several add-on cards, and multiple NVMe drives. Additional PCI-E lanes would be beneficial.