Comparing the RX 6600 + GTX 560 Ti with a PS3 offers a clear picture of performance differences across gaming platforms.
Comparing the RX 6600 + GTX 560 Ti with a PS3 offers a clear picture of performance differences across gaming platforms.
Meant to ask about a smaller version. Check your profile for details—if you have the mini tower, you can try cheaper mining options. For an OptiPlex 380, that’s a good choice.
I’d suggest skipping this build and saving up for $400. You could get an i3 with a GTX 950 or an i3 paired with a better overall system. What I understand is that any modern processor can handle the Q6600, but having an LGA 1150 socket opens up upgrade options if you want to keep the motherboard. Essentially, it’s a matter of what you value more—current performance or future flexibility. The Intel Pentium might offer higher FPS at a lower cost, while the GTX 660 at around 580 is fairly reliable according to Anand. I’ve seen many used units for $100, though a 560 Tis model would cost about $60 if you’re working with a tight budget.
Based on my experience with the Q6600, its CPU performance remains solid if you're not into models from 2013 or games with high demand. It struggles with a 560Ti processor. Consider upgrading to a newer chipset if possible. The BF4 is a popular choice but only runs smoothly at 60fps with low-medium graphics on 560Ti.
Honestly, it’s rarely the best option. I’d pick a Pentium 4 instead of the PS3. That 560 Ti and Q6600 might be limited, but it’ll perform significantly better in games than the PS3 does. Unless you’re still on a budget, go with a GTX 660—it supports many current games at higher resolutions. (Just note, running a GTX 660 on an i7 4790K would require lowering settings, but it meets most game requirements compared to the 560 Ti.) The choice really depends on your needs. No PC can handle PS3 exclusives well, and the PS3 isn’t suited for heavy tasks like building or intense gaming.