F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Comparing the options would help clarify the best choice.

Comparing the options would help clarify the best choice.

Comparing the options would help clarify the best choice.

V
209
07-12-2016, 12:14 PM
#1
You're weighing between a 3200MHz C22 memory and a 3000MHz C16 memory. The first offers quicker performance but with longer access delays, while the second provides slower data rates but quicker retrieval times. It's unclear which suits your needs best.
V
VeraquinGaming
07-12-2016, 12:14 PM #1

You're weighing between a 3200MHz C22 memory and a 3000MHz C16 memory. The first offers quicker performance but with longer access delays, while the second provides slower data rates but quicker retrieval times. It's unclear which suits your needs best.

D
Dustyn1001
Member
194
07-12-2016, 08:31 PM
#2
I hadn't realized you could achieve such low latency memory...? The 3000 CL 16 model performs significantly better. Are there other alternatives available?
D
Dustyn1001
07-12-2016, 08:31 PM #2

I hadn't realized you could achieve such low latency memory...? The 3000 CL 16 model performs significantly better. Are there other alternatives available?

_
_Pilif
Member
114
07-20-2016, 01:22 PM
#3
I this a question of limited options and price? 3200 CL16 would be better than both.
_
_Pilif
07-20-2016, 01:22 PM #3

I this a question of limited options and price? 3200 CL16 would be better than both.

X
XgAbYoP
Member
218
07-21-2016, 02:33 AM
#4
I'm setting up a premium workstation using Puget Systems. On their site builder it only shows the memory details as "8 x DDR4-3200 32GB". When I look deeper into the technical specifications, the latency is listed as "CL22" — which seems quite slow. I plan to reach out to them about getting better RAM, but first I want to share this with the community.
X
XgAbYoP
07-21-2016, 02:33 AM #4

I'm setting up a premium workstation using Puget Systems. On their site builder it only shows the memory details as "8 x DDR4-3200 32GB". When I look deeper into the technical specifications, the latency is listed as "CL22" — which seems quite slow. I plan to reach out to them about getting better RAM, but first I want to share this with the community.

X
xXSuperNovaXx
Posting Freak
811
07-27-2016, 02:53 AM
#5
It would be better to choose 3000 CL 16 for quicker results.
X
xXSuperNovaXx
07-27-2016, 02:53 AM #5

It would be better to choose 3000 CL 16 for quicker results.

K
KyleFrxst
Junior Member
13
07-27-2016, 03:50 AM
#6
Puget has expertise in this area; they’d likely explain their approach based on the platform being used.
K
KyleFrxst
07-27-2016, 03:50 AM #6

Puget has expertise in this area; they’d likely explain their approach based on the platform being used.