F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Comparing Ram Speeds and Clock Speeds for Ryzen processors.

Comparing Ram Speeds and Clock Speeds for Ryzen processors.

Comparing Ram Speeds and Clock Speeds for Ryzen processors.

H
he_jun_hao
Junior Member
Find
7
02-18-2017, 05:45 AM
#1
Uncertain if this fits overclocking or CPU categories, and if it's placed incorrectly, feel free to adjust its position.
Regarding the core of my inquiry: we all understand that RAM speeds impact Ryzen chips because the "Infinity Fabric" between the two CCXs depends on RAM speed.
Yet I haven’t found any comparisons on YouTube, overclocking forums, or articles that weigh the advantages of CPU versus RAM overclocking.
My goal is clear—I want to know which option delivers more value for my money.
Since memory prices can spike significantly with higher speeds, while a hyper 212 EVO or similar might cost up to 25 dollars in some areas (and some Ryzen chips even perform well on stock cooling), I’m trying to figure out: if I had only 25 dollars, would it be better to invest in a faster RAM for more overclocking potential or in higher-speed RAM for greater returns?
And compared to a stock 1600X with mild overclock to 3.7 across all cores and 2666+ memory, or an overclocked 1600X with 2133/2400 memory—anyone have experience testing this?
Reply
Reply
H
he_jun_hao
02-18-2017, 05:45 AM #1

Uncertain if this fits overclocking or CPU categories, and if it's placed incorrectly, feel free to adjust its position.
Regarding the core of my inquiry: we all understand that RAM speeds impact Ryzen chips because the "Infinity Fabric" between the two CCXs depends on RAM speed.
Yet I haven’t found any comparisons on YouTube, overclocking forums, or articles that weigh the advantages of CPU versus RAM overclocking.
My goal is clear—I want to know which option delivers more value for my money.
Since memory prices can spike significantly with higher speeds, while a hyper 212 EVO or similar might cost up to 25 dollars in some areas (and some Ryzen chips even perform well on stock cooling), I’m trying to figure out: if I had only 25 dollars, would it be better to invest in a faster RAM for more overclocking potential or in higher-speed RAM for greater returns?
And compared to a stock 1600X with mild overclock to 3.7 across all cores and 2666+ memory, or an overclocked 1600X with 2133/2400 memory—anyone have experience testing this?

Reply
Reply
S
SnifePvP
Posting Freak
Find
872
02-18-2017, 07:38 AM
#2
A lot of this revolves around marketing tactics. You don't really require faster memory than 2400 for a 1600x display. The variation is quite small, for instance, in games you'll notice only a difference of 4-9fps when playing in the 100s range at 1080p using a 1080ti. With a 1060 or 1070 the gap narrows even more. The same applies to overclocking a 1600x—5-10 fps in the 100s range at 1080p with a 1080ti.

In short, if you're willing to invest, ensure the benefits justify it. Otherwise, enjoy the process without spending extra for performance gains. I'd advise against overclocking solely for speed improvements unless you already have top-tier components; otherwise, it often doesn't add much value.

For example, upgrading a 6600k would need a z motherboard and a powerful cooler. With similar funds, you could get a locked 7700 on a standard board. Unless your main aim is to have fun with overclocking.
Reply
Reply
S
SnifePvP
02-18-2017, 07:38 AM #2

A lot of this revolves around marketing tactics. You don't really require faster memory than 2400 for a 1600x display. The variation is quite small, for instance, in games you'll notice only a difference of 4-9fps when playing in the 100s range at 1080p using a 1080ti. With a 1060 or 1070 the gap narrows even more. The same applies to overclocking a 1600x—5-10 fps in the 100s range at 1080p with a 1080ti.

In short, if you're willing to invest, ensure the benefits justify it. Otherwise, enjoy the process without spending extra for performance gains. I'd advise against overclocking solely for speed improvements unless you already have top-tier components; otherwise, it often doesn't add much value.

For example, upgrading a 6600k would need a z motherboard and a powerful cooler. With similar funds, you could get a locked 7700 on a standard board. Unless your main aim is to have fun with overclocking.

Reply
Reply