Comparing Gigabyte's ITE sensors, the Vcore Sensors ITE 8686E and ITE 8792E differ in specifications and performance.
Comparing Gigabyte's ITE sensors, the Vcore Sensors ITE 8686E and ITE 8792E differ in specifications and performance.
The readings on both boards show similar patterns, but IT8686E tends to match the CPUz data closely over the last few years. IT8792E doesn’t show these spikes but is slightly lower in voltage. There’s no "VR OUT" label on this board. The issue seems to be more about long-term stability rather than accuracy.
Remove the SIV module and you'll receive VR output logs. IT8686E would correspond to CPU-Z, but if you notice spikes, it likely reports more quickly than CPU-Z. It might take a measurement every half second compared to CPU-Z at each second.
This discussion applies to a TRX40 motherboard. AMD's processing method differs significantly from Intel's.
It seems I'm not too worried about this situation; it's been consistent for a few years now. My goal is around 1.38 volts using the middle setting LLC, which according to the IT8686E sensor averages 1.38v with slight spikes up to 1.43v, while the IT8792E shows an average of 1.36v peaking at 1.37v. These voltage jumps only happen during idle processes.
It isn't an AMD system. It uses an Intel Z370 processor. There are many misconceptions here—some of the voltage and temperature data aren't straightforward readings, but rather derived from algorithms, not direct measurements.
As Jurrunio noted, the estimate is close. Precise results require testing your VRMs directly.
It hasn't blown yet, so I feel confident. I also took out the 5.1ghz OC; it’s been sitting there for a while but didn’t help much. My 5800x seems stuck somewhere in the Midwest with FedEx.