F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Comparing an overclocked i5 750 at 4GHz to a modern i7 would depend on the specific models and conditions.

Comparing an overclocked i5 750 at 4GHz to a modern i7 would depend on the specific models and conditions.

Comparing an overclocked i5 750 at 4GHz to a modern i7 would depend on the specific models and conditions.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
domm0nkey
Member
154
11-23-2016, 09:45 PM
#1
Hi,
I'm setting up a gaming rig and I'm considering getting an older processor. It seems the graphics card I want (R9290 Vapor X) might be limited by this one (i5 750). I was wondering if I could overclock it to above 4 GHz—there are reports it can reach around 4.7 GHz. If you think it's feasible, let me know the steps. Also, if you expect it to hit speeds near the i7 range, please share your thoughts.

I'm not too concerned about heat or power because I'll also have a 650-watt platinum PSU and a Corsair H75 hydro cooler. I prefer using the same CPU since it's affordable and I'm confident it can meet my needs—my only concern is whether it will actually be a bottleneck.

Thanks a lot,
Ali
D
domm0nkey
11-23-2016, 09:45 PM #1

Hi,
I'm setting up a gaming rig and I'm considering getting an older processor. It seems the graphics card I want (R9290 Vapor X) might be limited by this one (i5 750). I was wondering if I could overclock it to above 4 GHz—there are reports it can reach around 4.7 GHz. If you think it's feasible, let me know the steps. Also, if you expect it to hit speeds near the i7 range, please share your thoughts.

I'm not too concerned about heat or power because I'll also have a 650-watt platinum PSU and a Corsair H75 hydro cooler. I prefer using the same CPU since it's affordable and I'm confident it can meet my needs—my only concern is whether it will actually be a bottleneck.

Thanks a lot,
Ali

D
Dom_rosa
Junior Member
22
11-23-2016, 09:59 PM
#2
Realistically, the CPU speeds of all components except the Z170 socket are only about 25% faster than the first-gen I7 45nm Nehalem processors released in 2008 when compared to the 4790K. A maximum of 4.5GHz is 25% slower than the 4.5GHz 4770K. Performance differences like 2600k, 3770k, and 4770K are mainly clock-based only.
D
Dom_rosa
11-23-2016, 09:59 PM #2

Realistically, the CPU speeds of all components except the Z170 socket are only about 25% faster than the first-gen I7 45nm Nehalem processors released in 2008 when compared to the 4790K. A maximum of 4.5GHz is 25% slower than the 4.5GHz 4770K. Performance differences like 2600k, 3770k, and 4770K are mainly clock-based only.

C
Curiousbacon
Member
108
11-24-2016, 07:45 PM
#3
Even with a consistent 4.7 GHz, it's unlikely you'll match today's i7 performance. You might get results similar to a more recent i5. I don't have experience with overclocking older Intel chips, so I can't share that advice.
C
Curiousbacon
11-24-2016, 07:45 PM #3

Even with a consistent 4.7 GHz, it's unlikely you'll match today's i7 performance. You might get results similar to a more recent i5. I don't have experience with overclocking older Intel chips, so I can't share that advice.

J
jjmonkey13
Member
236
11-25-2016, 03:36 AM
#4
Was ist die Überclockfähigkeit dieser CPU?
J
jjmonkey13
11-25-2016, 03:36 AM #4

Was ist die Überclockfähigkeit dieser CPU?

E
ElTorchoN
Member
161
12-13-2016, 11:17 AM
#5
Is that processor really capable of being overclocked? Absolutely, it is.
E
ElTorchoN
12-13-2016, 11:17 AM #5

Is that processor really capable of being overclocked? Absolutely, it is.

D
DurpVolts
Member
173
01-04-2017, 06:21 AM
#6
even if you achieve a steady 4.7 GHz, I question whether you'll reach performance levels similar to a contemporary i7. You might experience performance that's only slightly better than a more recent i5. I don't have direct experience with overclocking older Intel chips, so I can't offer advice on that. Thank you very much for your assistance—I hope you consider trying another processor.
D
DurpVolts
01-04-2017, 06:21 AM #6

even if you achieve a steady 4.7 GHz, I question whether you'll reach performance levels similar to a contemporary i7. You might experience performance that's only slightly better than a more recent i5. I don't have direct experience with overclocking older Intel chips, so I can't offer advice on that. Thank you very much for your assistance—I hope you consider trying another processor.

A
Askatal
Member
223
01-08-2017, 02:07 AM
#7
Diesel McGrot:
It will perform like an intel pentium, but you won't be able to push it that far. Consider getting a 6700K instead or something.
Thanks for the assistance, I'll look into it, but do you think it can still compete with a modern i5?
A
Askatal
01-08-2017, 02:07 AM #7

Diesel McGrot:
It will perform like an intel pentium, but you won't be able to push it that far. Consider getting a 6700K instead or something.
Thanks for the assistance, I'll look into it, but do you think it can still compete with a modern i5?

R
ReaperCreepR
Member
114
01-28-2017, 05:59 AM
#8
in terms of performance the i3 750 matches the capabilities of the i7 intel 4460, though its second generation nearleg suggests a maximum clock speed around 4.8ghz. with water cooling it could reach i7 920 at 3.5ghz or an i5 4460 delivering performance equivalent to a clock per clock. alternatively, a bone stock i7 4690k turbo at 3.5ghz would work well. the socket type differs, but these configurations have proven stable with a 45nm i7 920 @ 4.5ghz, and a 4.8ghz x5675 32nm, which should suit the 750 i5 32nm @ 4.6ghz.
R
ReaperCreepR
01-28-2017, 05:59 AM #8

in terms of performance the i3 750 matches the capabilities of the i7 intel 4460, though its second generation nearleg suggests a maximum clock speed around 4.8ghz. with water cooling it could reach i7 920 at 3.5ghz or an i5 4460 delivering performance equivalent to a clock per clock. alternatively, a bone stock i7 4690k turbo at 3.5ghz would work well. the socket type differs, but these configurations have proven stable with a 45nm i7 920 @ 4.5ghz, and a 4.8ghz x5675 32nm, which should suit the 750 i5 32nm @ 4.6ghz.

E
Echo_Runner
Member
215
01-28-2017, 10:26 AM
#9
A first generation i5 cannot match a contemporary i7 in any way or form.
Comparing the two shows a modern i7 is 48% to 138% quicker, consumes less energy, and stays cooler. Choosing such an outdated processor is completely unnecessary.
E
Echo_Runner
01-28-2017, 10:26 AM #9

A first generation i5 cannot match a contemporary i7 in any way or form.
Comparing the two shows a modern i7 is 48% to 138% quicker, consumes less energy, and stays cooler. Choosing such an outdated processor is completely unnecessary.

F
FureaMC
Senior Member
564
02-03-2017, 02:48 PM
#10
Realistically, the speeds of all CPUs except the z170 socket are only about 25% faster than the first-gen i7 45nm Nehalem chips released in 2008 when compared to the 4790k. A maximum of 4.5ghz is 25% slower than the 4.5ghz 4770k. Performance differences like 2600k, 3770k, and 4770k are mainly clock-based only.
F
FureaMC
02-03-2017, 02:48 PM #10

Realistically, the speeds of all CPUs except the z170 socket are only about 25% faster than the first-gen i7 45nm Nehalem chips released in 2008 when compared to the 4790k. A maximum of 4.5ghz is 25% slower than the 4.5ghz 4770k. Performance differences like 2600k, 3770k, and 4770k are mainly clock-based only.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next