F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare the two processors and see which performs better based on your needs.

Compare the two processors and see which performs better based on your needs.

Compare the two processors and see which performs better based on your needs.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
M
Metanium
Member
122
07-24-2019, 07:06 PM
#11
I don't see the context of why 2700x is no. Could you clarify the situation or provide more details?
M
Metanium
07-24-2019, 07:06 PM #11

I don't see the context of why 2700x is no. Could you clarify the situation or provide more details?

S
SuperMinerJM
Junior Member
2
08-11-2019, 04:29 AM
#12
There are too many cores, making it impossible for real work or games to use them effectively in the near future.
S
SuperMinerJM
08-11-2019, 04:29 AM #12

There are too many cores, making it impossible for real work or games to use them effectively in the near future.

K
kittyheartsMC
Member
63
08-11-2019, 04:57 AM
#13
8 cores are reasonable, not excessive. 6 cores meet the standard for gaming these days, so 8 offers a typical balance.
K
kittyheartsMC
08-11-2019, 04:57 AM #13

8 cores are reasonable, not excessive. 6 cores meet the standard for gaming these days, so 8 offers a typical balance.

J
JebThePleb
Posting Freak
898
08-11-2019, 11:20 AM
#14
Your title really didn't say it all, but at least you included it in the body of your post... Go with the 3600, unless the 2700x is substantially cheaper. There's no point in buying anything now, just wait. You'll save money. It really makes no sense to say you're going to buy 3 things and wait on the rest when you can't even use the first three... That makes no sense.
J
JebThePleb
08-11-2019, 11:20 AM #14

Your title really didn't say it all, but at least you included it in the body of your post... Go with the 3600, unless the 2700x is substantially cheaper. There's no point in buying anything now, just wait. You'll save money. It really makes no sense to say you're going to buy 3 things and wait on the rest when you can't even use the first three... That makes no sense.

F
Frinex10
Posting Freak
806
08-11-2019, 12:30 PM
#15
Keep in mind there are two threads involved.
F
Frinex10
08-11-2019, 12:30 PM #15

Keep in mind there are two threads involved.

K
Koollojoe
Posting Freak
830
08-11-2019, 04:54 PM
#16
Intel or Ryzen 3x model offers IPC improvements the older Gen1/2 Ryzen can’t match. Numerous titles demonstrate beneficial scaling with multiple threads—GTAV reaches 12, Tomb Raider up to 16, and Deus Ex achieves slight gains to 18. However, none surpass the performance boosts from IPC and frequency improvements in the main game engine thread, which remains the limiting factor when running 6-8 threads.
K
Koollojoe
08-11-2019, 04:54 PM #16

Intel or Ryzen 3x model offers IPC improvements the older Gen1/2 Ryzen can’t match. Numerous titles demonstrate beneficial scaling with multiple threads—GTAV reaches 12, Tomb Raider up to 16, and Deus Ex achieves slight gains to 18. However, none surpass the performance boosts from IPC and frequency improvements in the main game engine thread, which remains the limiting factor when running 6-8 threads.

S
shermenz
Junior Member
49
08-15-2019, 05:48 AM
#17
both options are acceptable; the 3600 works well unless you're planning to stream. If you're open to purchasing a program such as Process Lasso, it can help allocate four cores for gaming and four for streaming or background tasks at 2700x or higher. If you're aiming for a smoother experience, consider getting a motherboard that supports high core counts with strong VRM. Whether you choose a budget model or something more advanced, prioritize VRMs and future-proofing.

For a budget build, the current price of RAM and CPUs makes a 2700x a reasonable choice, especially if you're planning to upgrade later. I remember seeing similar setups with Ryzen 3000 chips and found an updated board for around $80.

When it comes to cooling, I was lucky to find a Snowman MT4 for under $5. Be cautious about selecting a board that doesn’t handle multiple cores well—especially if you're targeting the 4000 series or higher. If you're not buying a 3600 right now, a 8 or 12-core 3000 chip might be more affordable in a few years.

For gamers focused on detail and graphics, a 3600 offers better performance for high frame rates and low latency. It’s more competitive in multiplayer but may not look as sharp in single-player. Ultimately, weigh your priorities: speed vs. visual quality, and plan accordingly.
S
shermenz
08-15-2019, 05:48 AM #17

both options are acceptable; the 3600 works well unless you're planning to stream. If you're open to purchasing a program such as Process Lasso, it can help allocate four cores for gaming and four for streaming or background tasks at 2700x or higher. If you're aiming for a smoother experience, consider getting a motherboard that supports high core counts with strong VRM. Whether you choose a budget model or something more advanced, prioritize VRMs and future-proofing.

For a budget build, the current price of RAM and CPUs makes a 2700x a reasonable choice, especially if you're planning to upgrade later. I remember seeing similar setups with Ryzen 3000 chips and found an updated board for around $80.

When it comes to cooling, I was lucky to find a Snowman MT4 for under $5. Be cautious about selecting a board that doesn’t handle multiple cores well—especially if you're targeting the 4000 series or higher. If you're not buying a 3600 right now, a 8 or 12-core 3000 chip might be more affordable in a few years.

For gamers focused on detail and graphics, a 3600 offers better performance for high frame rates and low latency. It’s more competitive in multiplayer but may not look as sharp in single-player. Ultimately, weigh your priorities: speed vs. visual quality, and plan accordingly.

S
StephanKruger
Member
226
08-15-2019, 03:45 PM
#18
I’ll definitely recall that you seem unfamiliar with the topic and rely on what you’ve read online, likely from unqualified forums. Eight cores are essentially the baseline now, and I believe most people with basic understanding agree on that.
S
StephanKruger
08-15-2019, 03:45 PM #18

I’ll definitely recall that you seem unfamiliar with the topic and rely on what you’ve read online, likely from unqualified forums. Eight cores are essentially the baseline now, and I believe most people with basic understanding agree on that.

O
Omarhh
Member
217
08-17-2019, 01:43 AM
#19
A 1440p resolution really depends on the GPU you have. If it's a CPU, it might struggle with high-end GPUs like the Ryzen 9 3900X. More cores usually mean fewer frames per second, but that's not a big deal for me.
O
Omarhh
08-17-2019, 01:43 AM #19

A 1440p resolution really depends on the GPU you have. If it's a CPU, it might struggle with high-end GPUs like the Ryzen 9 3900X. More cores usually mean fewer frames per second, but that's not a big deal for me.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2