Compare the cooling performance of Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo and CRYORIG H7 49.0 CFM units.

A

Adabelle
Senior Member

724

04-08-2016, 06:02 PM

#1

i'm considering upgrading an i5 6600k to 4.2-4.6 ghz and wanted to know if a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo or CRYORIG H7 with 49.0 CFM would suffice to maintain stable cooling for roughly 8-12 hours in a room temperature range of 70-80°F. The setup includes two 120m intakes, a rear intake, and a top-mounted 120m intake.

B

BaccaStrq123
Senior Member

664

04-08-2016, 07:24 PM

#2

The H7 outperforms the 212 by a few cents, but stability at your output depends on the voltage applied. For 4.2 it should perform well at 4.6, though luck plays a role—you might need to consider the Cryorig H5 if conditions aren't ideal. The Cryorig H7 is rated at 140 Watts, while the H5 handles up to 180 Watts.

W

Whiizard
Junior Member

4

04-16-2016, 03:24 AM

#3

212's performed well with 100W+ processors, but now they are more suitable with 60-70W models. However, what I'm hearing is that the cryorg is easier to work with and just as good, while also looking better.

S

swordfishle
Member

62

04-17-2016, 10:21 PM

#4

The H7 outperforms the 212 by a few cents, but stability at your output depends on the voltage applied. For 4.2 it should perform well at 4.6, though luck plays a role—you might need to consider the Cryorig H5 if conditions aren't ideal. The Cryorig H7 is rated at 140 Watts, while the H5 handles up to 180 Watts.