Compare PS4 Pro with a $500-$600 gaming PC that supports 4K on a large screen.
Compare PS4 Pro with a $500-$600 gaming PC that supports 4K on a large screen.
Consider your setup carefully. For a 4K display, the PS4 Pro offers enhanced performance through upscaling, while a mid-range PC like an RX 480 or GTX 1060 may struggle to deliver smooth 4K gameplay without significant compromises. The benefits of owning a powerful PC are clear, but the PS4 Pro provides a more consistent experience out of the box.
Many people think a PC priced similarly to a PS4 Pro can't achieve true 4K native gaming. It often depends on upscaling from 1440p, which affects performance. Your view on temporal filtering seems to suggest the PS4 Pro handles content better due to its rendering methods. The PC relies more on the screen, while the PS4 Pro uses various techniques to enhance visuals.
The type of checkerboard TAA used on the PS4 Pro seems quite alike to that found in Rainbow Six Siege and Mankind Divided. It's likely the Pro doesn't display images at full native resolution, which might explain differences with indie games or remasters—Naughty Dog even reported the Last of Us remaster ran in 4K on the Pro. While the PS4 Pro offers less detail compared to what PCs can produce, achieving true 4K is challenging without powerful hardware. However, using ROTTR can help, and SSAA provides an alternative for lower resolutions.
So initially, we're not working at higher resolutions or downscaling; instead, we're using lower resolutions and upscaling with a 2x multiplier. That’s the way temporal filtering in R6S functions. Exactly what I meant. CLEARLY, a 4k native appearance looks superior to a 4k upscaled version, especially when combined with temporal filtering or whatever. BUT, for a build costing around $500-600 with an RX 480, achieving true native 4k on games like Rise of the Tomb Raider isn’t feasible. I’m aware the PS4 Pro doesn’t support native 4k either, but the upscaling techniques they employ likely appear better on a 4k display than simply streaming it in 1080p or 1440p and connecting to the TV. At least that’s my understanding from what I’ve seen.
Assemble a personal computer. Even playing 4K games at 4K resolution on a $600 build can be challenging, but adjustments and optimizations make it possible. LowSpecGamer is a helpful YouTube channel that explains how to run demanding games on older hardware—its tips could also help you stream 4K Netflix shows smoothly.
I really need someone to talk to. I already have a gaming PC with an R9 290, but he’s considering a 4K TV. He wants to make the most of it. I understand the benefits of a gaming PC, but I just need to see which option looks and works better on a 4K screen—whether it's a $500-600 gaming rig with an RX 480 or a PS4 Pro with its rendering features. Plus, streaming 4K Netflix is tough without solid internet speeds.
The PS4 Pro's GPU appears to be between the 470 and 480 models, or possibly an underclocked 480 which isn't too bad. The checkerboard method the console employs is similar to what you see in titles like Killzone and Quantum Break, though I believe the latter uses a less effective version.
The PS4 Pro might not appeal visually, and I haven't noticed many ads. I think the visual enhancements they use—like upscaling and adaptive sync—are similar to what PCs can do, but Sony seems targeting a more basic audience who prioritize convenience over technical depth.