F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Compare performance for gaming between these processors.

Compare performance for gaming between these processors.

Compare performance for gaming between these processors.

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
03-11-2018, 10:49 PM
#1
Hello, I was just experimenting with selling my i9 9900K while keeping my PC running on an i5 8600. My setup uses 1440p at 144hz for gaming and photography, with a GTX 1080 Ti GPU. I ran a superposition benchmark on both systems and was surprised to see the i5 8600 achieve a higher score. The i9 came in first place, while the i5 came in second. I have a couple of notes: 1.) why could the i5 perform better? 2.) do you think the i5 8600 will still be sufficient for 1440p gaming in the next 1-2 years without major performance issues? I also have a 1080 Ti GPU that could be upgraded to a 2080 Ti in the future. Thanks a lot! P.S. I bought the i9 9900K because I wanted to expand my wedding video editing services, though I’m not sure if I’ll ever have time for that. The i5 8600 might still work well for that too.
R
ReborntoKill
03-11-2018, 10:49 PM #1

Hello, I was just experimenting with selling my i9 9900K while keeping my PC running on an i5 8600. My setup uses 1440p at 144hz for gaming and photography, with a GTX 1080 Ti GPU. I ran a superposition benchmark on both systems and was surprised to see the i5 8600 achieve a higher score. The i9 came in first place, while the i5 came in second. I have a couple of notes: 1.) why could the i5 perform better? 2.) do you think the i5 8600 will still be sufficient for 1440p gaming in the next 1-2 years without major performance issues? I also have a 1080 Ti GPU that could be upgraded to a 2080 Ti in the future. Thanks a lot! P.S. I bought the i9 9900K because I wanted to expand my wedding video editing services, though I’m not sure if I’ll ever have time for that. The i5 8600 might still work well for that too.

P
pupik1
Junior Member
22
03-12-2018, 09:56 AM
#2
I'd keep the more expensive machine around if I were you, just keep it around for longer. Superposition is a GPU benchmark AFAIK so CPU shouldnt affect scores. I blame run to run variance and different Windows builds You're fine Now that's an even bigger waste of money comparing to the 9900k
P
pupik1
03-12-2018, 09:56 AM #2

I'd keep the more expensive machine around if I were you, just keep it around for longer. Superposition is a GPU benchmark AFAIK so CPU shouldnt affect scores. I blame run to run variance and different Windows builds You're fine Now that's an even bigger waste of money comparing to the 9900k

I
IPS10
Senior Member
623
03-13-2018, 06:46 AM
#3
You can explore benchmarks designed for GPU+CPU performance. Look for tools like Cinebench, 3DMark, or specialized stress tests that simulate demanding workloads.
I
IPS10
03-13-2018, 06:46 AM #3

You can explore benchmarks designed for GPU+CPU performance. Look for tools like Cinebench, 3DMark, or specialized stress tests that simulate demanding workloads.

D
disney_girl
Member
63
03-14-2018, 10:14 PM
#4
3dmark Time Spy works better when you skip the CPU test and use Cinebench instead, because there’s more information available for that.
D
disney_girl
03-14-2018, 10:14 PM #4

3dmark Time Spy works better when you skip the CPU test and use Cinebench instead, because there’s more information available for that.