F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Compare full installation and live options to see which suits your needs best.

Compare full installation and live options to see which suits your needs best.

Compare full installation and live options to see which suits your needs best.

E
eduardodd08
Posting Freak
852
02-25-2016, 12:03 PM
#1
Yes, there is a notable distinction. A live USB with persistence allows you to continue using files after reboot, while a full installation creates a new system image without retaining previous data.
E
eduardodd08
02-25-2016, 12:03 PM #1

Yes, there is a notable distinction. A live USB with persistence allows you to continue using files after reboot, while a full installation creates a new system image without retaining previous data.

A
avn815
Member
70
02-26-2016, 01:10 PM
#2
Persistent mode functions like live mode, yet it preserves your changes on the pendrive. The processing remains fully in RAM.
A
avn815
02-26-2016, 01:10 PM #2

Persistent mode functions like live mode, yet it preserves your changes on the pendrive. The processing remains fully in RAM.

E
Elmutt
Junior Member
37
02-26-2016, 02:05 PM
#3
Multiple live setups can operate simultaneously... The fully installed edition may start quicker, but its capabilities are restricted, and it’s likely usable only on the single machine you built it on.
E
Elmutt
02-26-2016, 02:05 PM #3

Multiple live setups can operate simultaneously... The fully installed edition may start quicker, but its capabilities are restricted, and it’s likely usable only on the single machine you built it on.

S
speedycux
Member
187
02-28-2016, 11:41 AM
#4
Current USB drives needing long-term storage are difficult to produce.
S
speedycux
02-28-2016, 11:41 AM #4

Current USB drives needing long-term storage are difficult to produce.

D
debilo
Member
52
02-28-2016, 01:37 PM
#5
It really makes a big distinction. I won’t dive into the details, but at the end it’s significantly worse—slower performance and far less dependable.
D
debilo
02-28-2016, 01:37 PM #5

It really makes a big distinction. I won’t dive into the details, but at the end it’s significantly worse—slower performance and far less dependable.

G
Gui_HD
Member
64
03-07-2016, 08:23 AM
#6
I possess an Ubuntu installation on a quick U3 microSD card that I can insert into my PC's internal drive, use with a dual USB card reader for connecting multiple devices, and even run as a virtual machine when needed. It functions perfectly.
G
Gui_HD
03-07-2016, 08:23 AM #6

I possess an Ubuntu installation on a quick U3 microSD card that I can insert into my PC's internal drive, use with a dual USB card reader for connecting multiple devices, and even run as a virtual machine when needed. It functions perfectly.

M
MadLyfe
Junior Member
47
03-07-2016, 08:30 AM
#7
Installing software on a USB drive differs from using a live USB drive.
M
MadLyfe
03-07-2016, 08:30 AM #7

Installing software on a USB drive differs from using a live USB drive.

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
03-07-2016, 12:52 PM
#8
I understand, I didn't mean to contradict myself. I can share what's been effective for me, unlike a stubborn live USB referenced earlier.
J
jjsoini
03-07-2016, 12:52 PM #8

I understand, I didn't mean to contradict myself. I can share what's been effective for me, unlike a stubborn live USB referenced earlier.

_
187
03-07-2016, 02:25 PM
#9
I aimed to make it clearer for the person asking the question.
_
_sappige_mann_
03-07-2016, 02:25 PM #9

I aimed to make it clearer for the person asking the question.

E
EzPwnz
Member
146
03-07-2016, 03:45 PM
#10
I prefer a full installation on an older SSD that already comes with many tools for restoring a system. I rely on USB as a backup when opening the case isn’t possible or permitted.
E
EzPwnz
03-07-2016, 03:45 PM #10

I prefer a full installation on an older SSD that already comes with many tools for restoring a system. I rely on USB as a backup when opening the case isn’t possible or permitted.