F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Compare 8350 and 3570k on Star Citizen.

Compare 8350 and 3570k on Star Citizen.

Compare 8350 and 3570k on Star Citizen.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
W
w3ssl3y
Junior Member
17
02-15-2016, 10:58 PM
#1
The better performer is the one that achieves higher results or efficiency.
W
w3ssl3y
02-15-2016, 10:58 PM #1

The better performer is the one that achieves higher results or efficiency.

S
Sebastian2799
Member
96
02-17-2016, 07:04 AM
#2
In gaming definitely i5 is a solid choice.
S
Sebastian2799
02-17-2016, 07:04 AM #2

In gaming definitely i5 is a solid choice.

R
redstonersven
Member
210
02-17-2016, 08:16 AM
#3
Why would you opt for a previous Intel model rather than the latest one in this price range?
R
redstonersven
02-17-2016, 08:16 AM #3

Why would you opt for a previous Intel model rather than the latest one in this price range?

J
JTDreamer
Junior Member
16
02-17-2016, 09:33 AM
#4
The i5 performs adequately with two cores and improves to four cores (the updated 4670k offers an upgrade).
J
JTDreamer
02-17-2016, 09:33 AM #4

The i5 performs adequately with two cores and improves to four cores (the updated 4670k offers an upgrade).

C
Creeper1958
Member
61
02-17-2016, 11:41 AM
#5
this is my CPU (my non-K one, unfortunately)
C
Creeper1958
02-17-2016, 11:41 AM #5

this is my CPU (my non-K one, unfortunately)

L
Lizzy310
Junior Member
44
02-18-2016, 10:09 PM
#6
There seems to be no valid reason for this inquiry—just a request for information about Star Citizen's performance.
L
Lizzy310
02-18-2016, 10:09 PM #6

There seems to be no valid reason for this inquiry—just a request for information about Star Citizen's performance.

B
BabyBash
Junior Member
15
02-19-2016, 01:12 AM
#7
From a curiosity standpoint, I was thinking about providing an answer once the other person replied, but you and others have already addressed it.
B
BabyBash
02-19-2016, 01:12 AM #7

From a curiosity standpoint, I was thinking about providing an answer once the other person replied, but you and others have already addressed it.

V
VebbiHD
Member
209
02-26-2016, 03:48 PM
#8
It's a fast-paced forum, huh?
V
VebbiHD
02-26-2016, 03:48 PM #8

It's a fast-paced forum, huh?

K
Krono
Junior Member
48
03-01-2016, 09:31 PM
#9
Haha, those discussions aren't worth much. An i5 is way better than anything else.
K
Krono
03-01-2016, 09:31 PM #9

Haha, those discussions aren't worth much. An i5 is way better than anything else.

K
Katy42320
Junior Member
4
03-04-2016, 10:41 PM
#10
I own a GTX 970 and an 8350, achieving 18 to 45 fps during intense battles isn't impressive enough. Even Chris Roberts believes the game should run smoothly on 6 to 8 cores, which is why I’m hesitant about buying it in its current unoptimized form.
K
Katy42320
03-04-2016, 10:41 PM #10

I own a GTX 970 and an 8350, achieving 18 to 45 fps during intense battles isn't impressive enough. Even Chris Roberts believes the game should run smoothly on 6 to 8 cores, which is why I’m hesitant about buying it in its current unoptimized form.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next