F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Clock speeds are decreasing in some Ryzen processors.

Clock speeds are decreasing in some Ryzen processors.

Clock speeds are decreasing in some Ryzen processors.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
Dreeezzyyweed
Junior Member
29
09-29-2016, 10:39 PM
#1
You're experiencing inconsistent results after overclocking one core in RyzenMaster. It seems the system is struggling to stabilize the target frequency for that specific core. Try adjusting the voltage or clock settings gradually, and ensure your cooling setup is adequate. If the issue persists, consider checking BIOS updates or consulting community forums for similar experiences.
D
Dreeezzyyweed
09-29-2016, 10:39 PM #1

You're experiencing inconsistent results after overclocking one core in RyzenMaster. It seems the system is struggling to stabilize the target frequency for that specific core. Try adjusting the voltage or clock settings gradually, and ensure your cooling setup is adequate. If the issue persists, consider checking BIOS updates or consulting community forums for similar experiences.

L
LuneBelle
Junior Member
7
10-04-2016, 02:52 PM
#2
This approach is typical across all main operations—prioritize utilizing every core at its peak performance rather than relying on a few slower units with one fast one. For boosting single-core efficiency, focus on optimizing tasks designed for individual cores.
L
LuneBelle
10-04-2016, 02:52 PM #2

This approach is typical across all main operations—prioritize utilizing every core at its peak performance rather than relying on a few slower units with one fast one. For boosting single-core efficiency, focus on optimizing tasks designed for individual cores.

A
Agman10
Senior Member
690
10-04-2016, 08:17 PM
#3
Would you like me to run the single-core test instead of the full system? The goal is to verify stability and ensure the clock reaches the expected speed. If I set all other cores to 4.65 GHz and the first core to 4.75 GHz, rather than both dropping to 3.719 GHz, they should adjust to 3.739 GHz.
A
Agman10
10-04-2016, 08:17 PM #3

Would you like me to run the single-core test instead of the full system? The goal is to verify stability and ensure the clock reaches the expected speed. If I set all other cores to 4.65 GHz and the first core to 4.75 GHz, rather than both dropping to 3.719 GHz, they should adjust to 3.739 GHz.

D
DIPPY91
Member
216
10-05-2016, 02:27 PM
#4
Transitioned to CPU designs, motherboard configurations, and memory systems.
D
DIPPY91
10-05-2016, 02:27 PM #4

Transitioned to CPU designs, motherboard configurations, and memory systems.

E
Egype
Junior Member
44
10-05-2016, 10:04 PM
#5
Adjusting one main core to a higher frequency simply raises its maximum, but it doesn't guarantee it stays there. To evaluate a single core, configure the affinity of the benchmark running in Task Manager. A program like PiMod is ideal for this purpose. The 32m test runs are the longest, typically taking about 8–10 minutes. This duration allows you to review outcomes and fine-tune settings as needed. GL!
E
Egype
10-05-2016, 10:04 PM #5

Adjusting one main core to a higher frequency simply raises its maximum, but it doesn't guarantee it stays there. To evaluate a single core, configure the affinity of the benchmark running in Task Manager. A program like PiMod is ideal for this purpose. The 32m test runs are the longest, typically taking about 8–10 minutes. This duration allows you to review outcomes and fine-tune settings as needed. GL!

C
cyprien5
Junior Member
11
10-06-2016, 05:29 AM
#6
The issue is clear though—when I run cinebench R23 with all cores at 4.625 MHz, Ryzen Master shows every core stays steady, but only when I raise another core’s maximum the others slow down. Plus, the Cinebench score drops noticeably.
C
cyprien5
10-06-2016, 05:29 AM #6

The issue is clear though—when I run cinebench R23 with all cores at 4.625 MHz, Ryzen Master shows every core stays steady, but only when I raise another core’s maximum the others slow down. Plus, the Cinebench score drops noticeably.

W
Whalis3
Junior Member
31
10-06-2016, 06:15 AM
#7
It might be better to lower the other cores to stay within power limits. Would you like me to capture a screenshot of the Ryzen Master game mode tab so you can see the PPT EDC limits?
W
Whalis3
10-06-2016, 06:15 AM #7

It might be better to lower the other cores to stay within power limits. Would you like me to capture a screenshot of the Ryzen Master game mode tab so you can see the PPT EDC limits?

M
Mommola
Member
62
10-06-2016, 07:36 AM
#8
You're operating in manual mode. When you select Auto Overclocking or PBO, the system applies default values: PPT 395, TDC 160, and EDC 190.
M
Mommola
10-06-2016, 07:36 AM #8

You're operating in manual mode. When you select Auto Overclocking or PBO, the system applies default values: PPT 395, TDC 160, and EDC 190.

S
SuperTigresss
Posting Freak
768
10-06-2016, 10:08 AM
#9
On the homepage, click the default settings in the top right corner. Then select the game mode tab at the bottom. Adjust the EDC to around 110 and observe the results. No further adjustments required; improvements should occur naturally if temperatures remain stable.
S
SuperTigresss
10-06-2016, 10:08 AM #9

On the homepage, click the default settings in the top right corner. Then select the game mode tab at the bottom. Adjust the EDC to around 110 and observe the results. No further adjustments required; improvements should occur naturally if temperatures remain stable.

B
Bobthekat
Junior Member
12
10-15-2016, 02:01 PM
#10
You don't necessarily need to modify the BIOS for this. The difference in CCX values often relates to specific hardware configurations or firmware settings, but it's usually not a requirement unless you're working with particular motherboards or systems.
B
Bobthekat
10-15-2016, 02:01 PM #10

You don't necessarily need to modify the BIOS for this. The difference in CCX values often relates to specific hardware configurations or firmware settings, but it's usually not a requirement unless you're working with particular motherboards or systems.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next