Choose higher bandwidth for faster speeds or opt for lower bandwidth for better range.
Choose higher bandwidth for faster speeds or opt for lower bandwidth for better range.
Support team, I'm unsure about purchasing an access point. At the same cost, I can get a 1300mbps Wi-Fi 6 router or a 2600mbps Wi-Fi 5 router. Which one should I choose? Need some details about my network: printer server, NAS server (supports 4k movies for up to 2 users), Steam link, IoT/wearables, Fire TVs.
If '2600' means two distinct radio areas merging into one combined total, that would likely be a stronger option because it expands the available frequency range for your network.
I support the WiFi 5 router, particularly when there are no compatible WiFi 6 devices available. Yet I've noticed users employing WiFi 6 mesh setups (without WiFi 6 clients) achieving better direct connections, extended coverage, and faster speeds for individual devices. These systems typically come with a higher price tag, so opt for a dependable WiFi 5 now and consider upgrading later if your equipment becomes outdated.
That figure of 2600 is misleading—the real limit for a Wi-Fi 5/802.11ac device is about 1300mbps, while it can deliver up to 2600mbps to several devices. For long-term reliability, a Wi-Fi 6 router would be better.
The 2600mbps is divided among two SSIDs, which is helpful since I can easily separate my devices.
Sure, I understand you're referring to using two different SSIDs and wondering why the Wi-Fi 6 feature stands out due to its subchannel technology. It seems you're considering placing low-priority devices on the 2.4GHz network, which might be acceptable, but your S10+ device is wired and the others are connected via Ethernet.
Currently, only my phone can’t connect via cable anymore. It’s mainly a plan for future expansion. We need to figure out which router will boost bandwidth for my phone, servers, one TV, PC, and laptop—other devices aren’t a big concern.