F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Choose between Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel i9 10900F for optimal performance.

Choose between Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel i9 10900F for optimal performance.

Choose between Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel i9 10900F for optimal performance.

C
ClaudiaCat
Member
141
05-18-2020, 07:48 PM
#1
I’ll stick to normal settings, focus on gaming and music production. I’m using Adobe and other programs, both priced the same. The i9 is an F version, so it likely lacks an integrated GPU. With an RTX 3080, that shouldn’t be a problem. What’s your priority?
C
ClaudiaCat
05-18-2020, 07:48 PM #1

I’ll stick to normal settings, focus on gaming and music production. I’m using Adobe and other programs, both priced the same. The i9 is an F version, so it likely lacks an integrated GPU. With an RTX 3080, that shouldn’t be a problem. What’s your priority?

X
X_Anabiel_X
Junior Member
12
05-20-2020, 05:11 PM
#2
For the same cost, I’d choose the i9.
X
X_Anabiel_X
05-20-2020, 05:11 PM #2

For the same cost, I’d choose the i9.

L
link_TLZ
Junior Member
28
05-21-2020, 06:47 PM
#3
Yes, it's the full version.
L
link_TLZ
05-21-2020, 06:47 PM #3

Yes, it's the full version.

M
Milan1208
Member
103
05-21-2020, 07:38 PM
#4
For handling numerous tracks or frequent rendering, the i9’s increased core count offers advantages. On the other hand, my setup uses a 5600x and I’ve found FL Studio demo tracks to be reliable for larger projects, performing well with any games I’ve tested.
M
Milan1208
05-21-2020, 07:38 PM #4

For handling numerous tracks or frequent rendering, the i9’s increased core count offers advantages. On the other hand, my setup uses a 5600x and I’ve found FL Studio demo tracks to be reliable for larger projects, performing well with any games I’ve tested.

F
fartgamer1234
Member
154
05-21-2020, 08:40 PM
#5
If you're still receiving a 3080, you won't require an IGPU. The Ryzen 5600X also lacks one.
F
fartgamer1234
05-21-2020, 08:40 PM #5

If you're still receiving a 3080, you won't require an IGPU. The Ryzen 5600X also lacks one.

M
Maffin_
Member
181
06-12-2020, 12:18 AM
#6
It appears the i9-10850k is similar to the i9-10900F in performance. It can be overclocked, but it might benefit from a bit more stock boost for all cores.
M
Maffin_
06-12-2020, 12:18 AM #6

It appears the i9-10850k is similar to the i9-10900F in performance. It can be overclocked, but it might benefit from a bit more stock boost for all cores.

B
beichner
Senior Member
447
07-02-2020, 02:15 PM
#7
That sounds great! I really appreciate it. I actually have a Dark Rock Pro 4 and if I manage to get the 10850k, I could try overclocking it. Thanks!
B
beichner
07-02-2020, 02:15 PM #7

That sounds great! I really appreciate it. I actually have a Dark Rock Pro 4 and if I manage to get the 10850k, I could try overclocking it. Thanks!

S
shjo89
Member
63
07-17-2020, 04:12 AM
#8
I'm a bit unsure about boosting these chips while running them in air—especially since I just got a Deepcool Assassin 3, which performs well compared to the Noctua NH-D15. I considered moving to the 10850K for a cheaper option, but from what I've read, a powerful air cooler might be needed for optimal stock performance. Overclocking seems likely only with big all-in-one coolers. The 10900F all-core is around 4.5GHz versus 4.8GHz on the 10850K, which gives me an idea of the difference.
S
shjo89
07-17-2020, 04:12 AM #8

I'm a bit unsure about boosting these chips while running them in air—especially since I just got a Deepcool Assassin 3, which performs well compared to the Noctua NH-D15. I considered moving to the 10850K for a cheaper option, but from what I've read, a powerful air cooler might be needed for optimal stock performance. Overclocking seems likely only with big all-in-one coolers. The 10900F all-core is around 4.5GHz versus 4.8GHz on the 10850K, which gives me an idea of the difference.

T
TheCCSampson
Member
70
07-17-2020, 07:57 AM
#9
You're aware of the strong reputation of Dark Rock 4 Pro? They claim it matches the performance of AIO coolers, just slightly better.
T
TheCCSampson
07-17-2020, 07:57 AM #9

You're aware of the strong reputation of Dark Rock 4 Pro? They claim it matches the performance of AIO coolers, just slightly better.

A
AnttoZz
Member
179
07-19-2020, 08:08 AM
#10
DRP4 offers solid cooling capabilities, though it falls slightly behind the NH-D15 and Assassin 3 models. It behaves quite similarly under lighter workloads compared to a 240, but there are deeper technical aspects beyond just the test scores. At certain points of heat generation and power output, AIOs may surpass even the top air coolers. Reports suggest that achieving real overclocking might require around 10900k (comparable to 10850k), though a 280 or higher is often needed for meaningful gains. I can't verify this myself, but I think it's accurate. Keep in mind that the 10850k was a flawed version of the 10900k, so its thermal efficiency at the same speeds is likely lower. This isn't a perfect comparison since it's the standard DR4, but it gives you a sense of the situation. It seems to be the original stock build. https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/in...ew,30.html
A
AnttoZz
07-19-2020, 08:08 AM #10

DRP4 offers solid cooling capabilities, though it falls slightly behind the NH-D15 and Assassin 3 models. It behaves quite similarly under lighter workloads compared to a 240, but there are deeper technical aspects beyond just the test scores. At certain points of heat generation and power output, AIOs may surpass even the top air coolers. Reports suggest that achieving real overclocking might require around 10900k (comparable to 10850k), though a 280 or higher is often needed for meaningful gains. I can't verify this myself, but I think it's accurate. Keep in mind that the 10850k was a flawed version of the 10900k, so its thermal efficiency at the same speeds is likely lower. This isn't a perfect comparison since it's the standard DR4, but it gives you a sense of the situation. It seems to be the original stock build. https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/in...ew,30.html