Choose between 3200 c16 and 3600 c18 based on your needs.

181

06-30-2019, 01:51 PM

The setup is clearly outlined. I'm using an Intel i5-9600k on an Asus ROG Z390E with a GTX 1070Ti. Upgrading memory is the goal, and I'm considering either 3200Mhz C16 or 3600Mhz C18, both offering 32GB (four 8GB modules).

silvertooth98

06-30-2019, 01:51 PM #1

NiamhyPoo
Junior Member

06-30-2019, 03:18 PM

Typically, speed is more valuable than latency. What purpose does 32GB of memory serve?

NiamhyPoo

06-30-2019, 03:18 PM #2

Typically, speed is more valuable than latency. What purpose does 32GB of memory serve?

The_Almaity
Member

06-30-2019, 06:26 PM

Given the 9600K frequency range, I wouldn't see significant gains beyond 3000MHz, so it's best to opt for the more affordable option.

The_Almaity

06-30-2019, 06:26 PM #3

Given the 9600K frequency range, I wouldn't see significant gains beyond 3000MHz, so it's best to opt for the more affordable option.

Typogif
Junior Member

07-03-2019, 06:08 AM

Chrome!!! All Chrome versions! The 3200 and 3600 models cost almost the same as the 3000 ones right now, so there’s no real benefit. I’m thinking about switching to an AMD platform later, which might make those faster speeds even more useful.

Typogif

07-03-2019, 06:08 AM #4

1ncognito_
Junior Member

07-03-2019, 02:26 PM

I’d likely choose the 3600 CL18 kit. As @Slottr noted earlier, higher frequency tends to offer better results in this situation.

1ncognito_

07-03-2019, 02:26 PM #5

I’d likely choose the 3600 CL18 kit. As @Slottr noted earlier, higher frequency tends to offer better results in this situation.

mincr4fters
Member

07-03-2019, 09:24 PM

What is the cost variation? If the increase exceeds 10%, I'll choose the more affordable option. Also, opt for a 2x16GB configuration. This reduces pressure on the memory controller while leaving room for future upgrades.

mincr4fters

07-03-2019, 09:24 PM #6

Pigster007
Member

172

07-12-2019, 03:22 PM

BOTH are horrible timing sets on a 9600k with any halfway decent motherboard. Save the money, get some nice 4000+mhz memory sticks and get some very noticeable performance gains. 3200mhz way low, 3600mhz (CL16) is Meh. I did not vote due to lack of selection.... Neither kit.

Pigster007

07-12-2019, 03:22 PM #7

JokerFame
Senior Member

670

07-12-2019, 08:22 PM

It really isn’t a significant improvement, especially given the high cost of memory kits starting around 3733MHz. In my opinion, it would just be an unnecessary expense.

JokerFame

07-12-2019, 08:22 PM #8

It really isn’t a significant improvement, especially given the high cost of memory kits starting around 3733MHz. In my opinion, it would just be an unnecessary expense.

Votel185
Member

07-14-2019, 12:22 PM

Yes, the foundation of this theory relies on two benchmarks created using artificial data points. The distinction lies in direct observation versus virtual exposure.

Votel185

07-14-2019, 12:22 PM #9

Yes, the foundation of this theory relies on two benchmarks created using artificial data points. The distinction lies in direct observation versus virtual exposure.