F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Choose a lightweight distro like Lubuntu, Xubuntu, or LXDE for a beginner on a low-power system.

Choose a lightweight distro like Lubuntu, Xubuntu, or LXDE for a beginner on a low-power system.

Choose a lightweight distro like Lubuntu, Xubuntu, or LXDE for a beginner on a low-power system.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
thatonesteve_
Junior Member
44
07-06-2023, 07:45 AM
#1
I own a used Spoiler Athlon 64 TF-20 (1.6ghz), 3gb DDR2 666MHz, Radeon graphics card (not so good), HD 3200 160GB SSD, and a new gaming laptop. I aim to swap in a Linux distribution for running older games while keeping Windows 7. I’m looking for alternatives to Wine that support DX9 and legacy titles. I need a free distro that can be installed from a Windows installation and works well on my desktop setup.
T
thatonesteve_
07-06-2023, 07:45 AM #1

I own a used Spoiler Athlon 64 TF-20 (1.6ghz), 3gb DDR2 666MHz, Radeon graphics card (not so good), HD 3200 160GB SSD, and a new gaming laptop. I aim to swap in a Linux distribution for running older games while keeping Windows 7. I’m looking for alternatives to Wine that support DX9 and legacy titles. I need a free distro that can be installed from a Windows installation and works well on my desktop setup.

C
CytrexLP
Junior Member
13
07-06-2023, 09:31 PM
#2
Test xubuntu, it works fine on slower machines. Just check the games, you might not get great GPU performance.
C
CytrexLP
07-06-2023, 09:31 PM #2

Test xubuntu, it works fine on slower machines. Just check the games, you might not get great GPU performance.

_
_Ninguem_
Member
140
07-07-2023, 08:28 PM
#3
Another distribution is capable. I could install Arch with a minimal desktop environment such as XFCE.
_
_Ninguem_
07-07-2023, 08:28 PM #3

Another distribution is capable. I could install Arch with a minimal desktop environment such as XFCE.

W
WoofyMonster
Member
121
07-11-2023, 02:19 AM
#4
DE? XFCE works well at 40-50 frames per second on 720p low settings for Portal. I also achieved an OC of over 380MHz without needing more voltage. Regarding installation, both Arxh and Xbunutu can be installed from a Windows install to another drive.
W
WoofyMonster
07-11-2023, 02:19 AM #4

DE? XFCE works well at 40-50 frames per second on 720p low settings for Portal. I also achieved an OC of over 380MHz without needing more voltage. Regarding installation, both Arxh and Xbunutu can be installed from a Windows install to another drive.

P
Poop_Head27
Posting Freak
820
07-25-2023, 05:31 PM
#5
XFCE is a good example of a lightweight desktop environment that works well. Are you asking about dual-booting?
P
Poop_Head27
07-25-2023, 05:31 PM #5

XFCE is a good example of a lightweight desktop environment that works well. Are you asking about dual-booting?

T
Tekkerzz25
Member
191
07-25-2023, 09:33 PM
#6
No dual-boot setup is needed. Since you don’t have a USB or hard drive for installation, you’ll need to remove the laptop’s HDD, install it on your desktop, and then reinstall everything. I’m checking whether you’d have to boot an installation disk into BIOS during setup or if it can run in Windows.
T
Tekkerzz25
07-25-2023, 09:33 PM #6

No dual-boot setup is needed. Since you don’t have a USB or hard drive for installation, you’ll need to remove the laptop’s HDD, install it on your desktop, and then reinstall everything. I’m checking whether you’d have to boot an installation disk into BIOS during setup or if it can run in Windows.

B
BestBart
Member
52
08-02-2023, 05:03 PM
#7
It's not possible to purchase or lend a $5 USB device.
B
BestBart
08-02-2023, 05:03 PM #7

It's not possible to purchase or lend a $5 USB device.

I
IMayBeDead
Senior Member
696
08-02-2023, 07:00 PM
#8
Honestly, the distribution isn't that impactful. The desktop environment selection has the greatest effect on how much resources it consumes. In the past, both Gnome and KDE were seen as heavy and demanding on system resources. I believe this still holds for Gnome 3, though KDE Plasma 5 DE is quite efficient. I've even tested it on a netbook with an Atom chip and just 1GB of RAM—it ran smoothly (though I might have opened only one or two tabs in Chrome, which was more than expected after my rough Windows 7 Starter Edition experience). I suggest giving it a try. If you're still seeking lighter options, LXQt is a solid alternative; it uses fewer resources than XFCE, which is typically recommended for minimal usage. The Enlightenment desktop is another lightweight choice that often goes overlooked, but it's worth exploring. For beginners, Linux Mint or Manjaro are great picks. LXDE could also be interesting. I favor Gentoo, though it isn't ideal if you want a straightforward OOTB setup. As for gaming, FreeBSD might outperform Linux on budget hardware, though it comes with a steeper learning curve compared to most distros (unless using GhostBSD). Most of these issues are minor compared to the overall experience.
I
IMayBeDead
08-02-2023, 07:00 PM #8

Honestly, the distribution isn't that impactful. The desktop environment selection has the greatest effect on how much resources it consumes. In the past, both Gnome and KDE were seen as heavy and demanding on system resources. I believe this still holds for Gnome 3, though KDE Plasma 5 DE is quite efficient. I've even tested it on a netbook with an Atom chip and just 1GB of RAM—it ran smoothly (though I might have opened only one or two tabs in Chrome, which was more than expected after my rough Windows 7 Starter Edition experience). I suggest giving it a try. If you're still seeking lighter options, LXQt is a solid alternative; it uses fewer resources than XFCE, which is typically recommended for minimal usage. The Enlightenment desktop is another lightweight choice that often goes overlooked, but it's worth exploring. For beginners, Linux Mint or Manjaro are great picks. LXDE could also be interesting. I favor Gentoo, though it isn't ideal if you want a straightforward OOTB setup. As for gaming, FreeBSD might outperform Linux on budget hardware, though it comes with a steeper learning curve compared to most distros (unless using GhostBSD). Most of these issues are minor compared to the overall experience.

Z
Zelumard_
Junior Member
11
08-08-2023, 11:20 PM
#9
You might consider Kubuntu, KDE Neon, or Pop OS. They should all function nicely with your computer's specifications.
Z
Zelumard_
08-08-2023, 11:20 PM #9

You might consider Kubuntu, KDE Neon, or Pop OS. They should all function nicely with your computer's specifications.

Y
YakGamer
Junior Member
11
08-16-2023, 08:22 AM
#10
Realistically, your computer isn't so weak that a specialized distribution wouldn't work. Pop!OS is quite straightforward to use and should function well on it.
Y
YakGamer
08-16-2023, 08:22 AM #10

Realistically, your computer isn't so weak that a specialized distribution wouldn't work. Pop!OS is quite straightforward to use and should function well on it.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next