F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Checking compatibility for Windows 11 on less common processors – should you invest?

Checking compatibility for Windows 11 on less common processors – should you invest?

Checking compatibility for Windows 11 on less common processors – should you invest?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
L
LukiX_HD
Junior Member
3
07-01-2021, 06:09 PM
#11
Vista on P4 and Pentium D models with 256MB to 512MB RAM and Intel integrated graphics often faced issues playing DVDs, typically only reaching 480p quality. The presence of missing drivers contributed to these problems. Users frequently seek benchmarks to understand how performance drops affect their systems, especially when games that run smoothly at 600fps struggle at 5fps. Any slowdown is seen as a significant issue, though it’s not the main focus compared to software quirks and background processes. Microsoft aims to deliver Windows performance on comparable hardware or better.
L
LukiX_HD
07-01-2021, 06:09 PM #11

Vista on P4 and Pentium D models with 256MB to 512MB RAM and Intel integrated graphics often faced issues playing DVDs, typically only reaching 480p quality. The presence of missing drivers contributed to these problems. Users frequently seek benchmarks to understand how performance drops affect their systems, especially when games that run smoothly at 600fps struggle at 5fps. Any slowdown is seen as a significant issue, though it’s not the main focus compared to software quirks and background processes. Microsoft aims to deliver Windows performance on comparable hardware or better.

H
hanniie_
Junior Member
36
07-22-2021, 03:29 PM
#12
none of the discussed points relate meaningfully to our original situation. essentially, there’s nothing relevant here. what we’re talking about is whether the Windows 11 installer restricts you from installing on incompatible CPUs without changing the ISO, and that the performance data isn’t connected to real-world results. i don’t understand how P4 or Vista fit into this—it seems like a frustration over an installer limitation. just to mention, you can still install on older CPUs as long as they’re recent enough.
H
hanniie_
07-22-2021, 03:29 PM #12

none of the discussed points relate meaningfully to our original situation. essentially, there’s nothing relevant here. what we’re talking about is whether the Windows 11 installer restricts you from installing on incompatible CPUs without changing the ISO, and that the performance data isn’t connected to real-world results. i don’t understand how P4 or Vista fit into this—it seems like a frustration over an installer limitation. just to mention, you can still install on older CPUs as long as they’re recent enough.

C
casaakvik
Junior Member
8
07-24-2021, 04:30 AM
#13
Vista likely came before your era. Many users faced significant issues with it. XP and earlier OS versions generally performed well on their systems. Vista introduced numerous new features aimed at modern hardware (late 2006 onward) but posed challenges for older setups. If your system was outdated or used legacy tech—like an IDE HDD instead of SATA-2, or an HDD without NCQ support—you probably encountered problems. Insufficient RAM, single-core CPUs, or GPUs unable to handle advanced graphics tasks could all contribute to poor performance. Additionally, missing drivers and BIOS compatibility often led to crashes and BSODs. Many blamed Vista itself for its complexity and bloat, rather than the system's age.

For Windows 11 to function smoothly, your hardware needs to meet certain requirements: a capable processor, supported features without CPU emulation, and up-to-date drivers. I once ran Windows 11 on a Core i7 930, which was outdated for its time—upgrading was delayed by circumstances. My Surface Pro 3 also struggled with it, showing noticeable lag. However, my AMD Ryzen 7700X and a 4K monitor performed excellently, highlighting how modern hardware can make Windows 11 shine.

Microsoft seems aware that if support continues, criticism will persist about Windows 11, even though it shares the same core kernel as Windows 10 with added improvements. If your CPU has built-in security features to leverage Windows 11’s performance boosts, you’ll likely experience a smoother experience. Otherwise, expect reduced speed and responsiveness.
C
casaakvik
07-24-2021, 04:30 AM #13

Vista likely came before your era. Many users faced significant issues with it. XP and earlier OS versions generally performed well on their systems. Vista introduced numerous new features aimed at modern hardware (late 2006 onward) but posed challenges for older setups. If your system was outdated or used legacy tech—like an IDE HDD instead of SATA-2, or an HDD without NCQ support—you probably encountered problems. Insufficient RAM, single-core CPUs, or GPUs unable to handle advanced graphics tasks could all contribute to poor performance. Additionally, missing drivers and BIOS compatibility often led to crashes and BSODs. Many blamed Vista itself for its complexity and bloat, rather than the system's age.

For Windows 11 to function smoothly, your hardware needs to meet certain requirements: a capable processor, supported features without CPU emulation, and up-to-date drivers. I once ran Windows 11 on a Core i7 930, which was outdated for its time—upgrading was delayed by circumstances. My Surface Pro 3 also struggled with it, showing noticeable lag. However, my AMD Ryzen 7700X and a 4K monitor performed excellently, highlighting how modern hardware can make Windows 11 shine.

Microsoft seems aware that if support continues, criticism will persist about Windows 11, even though it shares the same core kernel as Windows 10 with added improvements. If your CPU has built-in security features to leverage Windows 11’s performance boosts, you’ll likely experience a smoother experience. Otherwise, expect reduced speed and responsiveness.

C
CarmineSenpai
Member
176
07-24-2021, 09:13 PM
#14
I completely understand your point, but if the system is functioning well, explain why Windows 11 works smoothly on my 4790K while not getting an official install, yet it struggles on my J5005 and will eventually get approved. The examples are simple, and you’re still focusing on outdated discussions about Windows Vista, where I still can’t grasp how those old issues connect to current problems. Yes, I’m familiar with the problems of Vista; it had many unreliable aspects. But none of that applies to Windows 11, since those older devices were essentially low-end models—something you can still run on Windows 11 (see the J5005 case). You’re sidestepping the main issue: the list doesn’t address how well Windows 11 performs on your hardware, which is what matters for compatibility. Also, the OEMs involved are completely separate from the installation process itself. If you truly want to sell Windows 11 devices, you’ll need to follow Microsoft’s guidelines in their licensing terms (as a business, they have more influence). Otherwise, if they include system requirements in contracts with OEMs, they can enforce what’s needed for a full setup. Right now, this approach is contributing to more electronic waste, because usable machines that could run Windows 11 are being discarded simply because they’re deemed incompatible. From my testing, if anything, Windows 11 might offer a better experience on older hardware than Windows 10, provided there are at least basic drivers available—something many “denied” systems lack. To clarify my stance: I’ve taken my old i3 540 out of the box and swapped it into my Windows 7 setup using an SSD from a test PC. I enabled UEFI and updated Windows to get the required drivers. The game ran fine, even on a 6GB RAM system. This shows that with the right steps, compatibility can be achieved.
C
CarmineSenpai
07-24-2021, 09:13 PM #14

I completely understand your point, but if the system is functioning well, explain why Windows 11 works smoothly on my 4790K while not getting an official install, yet it struggles on my J5005 and will eventually get approved. The examples are simple, and you’re still focusing on outdated discussions about Windows Vista, where I still can’t grasp how those old issues connect to current problems. Yes, I’m familiar with the problems of Vista; it had many unreliable aspects. But none of that applies to Windows 11, since those older devices were essentially low-end models—something you can still run on Windows 11 (see the J5005 case). You’re sidestepping the main issue: the list doesn’t address how well Windows 11 performs on your hardware, which is what matters for compatibility. Also, the OEMs involved are completely separate from the installation process itself. If you truly want to sell Windows 11 devices, you’ll need to follow Microsoft’s guidelines in their licensing terms (as a business, they have more influence). Otherwise, if they include system requirements in contracts with OEMs, they can enforce what’s needed for a full setup. Right now, this approach is contributing to more electronic waste, because usable machines that could run Windows 11 are being discarded simply because they’re deemed incompatible. From my testing, if anything, Windows 11 might offer a better experience on older hardware than Windows 10, provided there are at least basic drivers available—something many “denied” systems lack. To clarify my stance: I’ve taken my old i3 540 out of the box and swapped it into my Windows 7 setup using an SSD from a test PC. I enabled UEFI and updated Windows to get the required drivers. The game ran fine, even on a 6GB RAM system. This shows that with the right steps, compatibility can be achieved.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2