F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Check the compatibility list for your older system and see which servers are optimized for it.

Check the compatibility list for your older system and see which servers are optimized for it.

Check the compatibility list for your older system and see which servers are optimized for it.

S
Swag_Games
Member
61
06-08-2025, 04:23 AM
#1
I possess an older setup featuring a Core 2 Duo E8400 and 4GB of memory. I understand that 64 ticks is typical for CSGO, but 128 ticks is better suited for Minecraft. My rig is purely for the server, with no other plans. Which game will it perform better for? And how much improvement would an upgrade to a Q8200 with 8GB RAM bring? Appreciate any advice.
S
Swag_Games
06-08-2025, 04:23 AM #1

I possess an older setup featuring a Core 2 Duo E8400 and 4GB of memory. I understand that 64 ticks is typical for CSGO, but 128 ticks is better suited for Minecraft. My rig is purely for the server, with no other plans. Which game will it perform better for? And how much improvement would an upgrade to a Q8200 with 8GB RAM bring? Appreciate any advice.

P
POKE_PRESLEY
Member
177
06-08-2025, 07:59 AM
#2
Minecraft generally handles core2 well, though you should be cautious with your actions since it can be unstable. Regarding CS:GO... I don’t think there’s a major problem there either. Given the setup of both servers—minecraft running in a single thread and CS:GO using two threads—adding more RAM and a C2 upgrade can make them coexist smoothly.
P
POKE_PRESLEY
06-08-2025, 07:59 AM #2

Minecraft generally handles core2 well, though you should be cautious with your actions since it can be unstable. Regarding CS:GO... I don’t think there’s a major problem there either. Given the setup of both servers—minecraft running in a single thread and CS:GO using two threads—adding more RAM and a C2 upgrade can make them coexist smoothly.

M
MrGoldenApple
Member
166
06-15-2025, 08:39 AM
#3
They’re designed for single-threaded tasks, so a 3GHz dual-core processor would likely perform better than a slower quad-core chip. Running a server on each core is possible, though it depends on workload. The performance gap between 64 and 128 TDC is noticeable but varies based on the specific tasks.
M
MrGoldenApple
06-15-2025, 08:39 AM #3

They’re designed for single-threaded tasks, so a 3GHz dual-core processor would likely perform better than a slower quad-core chip. Running a server on each core is possible, though it depends on workload. The performance gap between 64 and 128 TDC is noticeable but varies based on the specific tasks.

C
CocaCola15
Senior Member
603
06-21-2025, 07:20 PM
#4
the setup was built to work with that platform, so i don’t think there’s a big issue. i’ve run multiple gmod servers on an athlon 64 without problems, and many online guides mention handling 128 tick servers alongside other tasks on a 2.4ghz cpu. the main point is keeping everything isolated so cs:go performance doesn’t affect other games like minecraft. i’m more concerned about the 20 ticks in minecraft than the 128 ticks on c2q with a quadcore.
C
CocaCola15
06-21-2025, 07:20 PM #4

the setup was built to work with that platform, so i don’t think there’s a big issue. i’ve run multiple gmod servers on an athlon 64 without problems, and many online guides mention handling 128 tick servers alongside other tasks on a 2.4ghz cpu. the main point is keeping everything isolated so cs:go performance doesn’t affect other games like minecraft. i’m more concerned about the 20 ticks in minecraft than the 128 ticks on c2q with a quadcore.