F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Check if you need more RAM or an upgrade.

Check if you need more RAM or an upgrade.

Check if you need more RAM or an upgrade.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
loliminer2012
Member
61
02-16-2016, 12:22 AM
#1
You're weighing options for your HP z840 workstation upgrade. Adding more memory sticks can improve performance, but the best choice depends on your priorities. The 16GB option would likely be faster than the 8GB setup, especially with DDR4-2133 ECC or 2400 ECC. Since you mentioned you could recoup the cost by selling the old system, it might make sense to go with the higher capacity now. Consider your workload and whether speed is more important than immediate savings.
L
loliminer2012
02-16-2016, 12:22 AM #1

You're weighing options for your HP z840 workstation upgrade. Adding more memory sticks can improve performance, but the best choice depends on your priorities. The 16GB option would likely be faster than the 8GB setup, especially with DDR4-2133 ECC or 2400 ECC. Since you mentioned you could recoup the cost by selling the old system, it might make sense to go with the higher capacity now. Consider your workload and whether speed is more important than immediate savings.

G
guguis_3000
Member
145
02-17-2016, 01:12 AM
#2
It seems the trade-off isn't worth it—16 sticks give you 2DPC, enough for rank interleaving, yet the performance gain is minimal. Instead of expanding to 192GB, consider using eight 16GB sticks for a larger capacity.
G
guguis_3000
02-17-2016, 01:12 AM #2

It seems the trade-off isn't worth it—16 sticks give you 2DPC, enough for rank interleaving, yet the performance gain is minimal. Instead of expanding to 192GB, consider using eight 16GB sticks for a larger capacity.

M
mj18wals
Senior Member
256
02-17-2016, 04:13 AM
#3
I’d opt for the quicker performance and then dispose of the old RAM. The 8x8GB with 2133MHz is actually priced close to 100 pounds here in the UK, so I’d go for the faster option and sell your old RAM now. You can get it for about 70 or 80 dollars, or even less (still around $50), because US prices for 64GB at that speed seem reasonable.
M
mj18wals
02-17-2016, 04:13 AM #3

I’d opt for the quicker performance and then dispose of the old RAM. The 8x8GB with 2133MHz is actually priced close to 100 pounds here in the UK, so I’d go for the faster option and sell your old RAM now. You can get it for about 70 or 80 dollars, or even less (still around $50), because US prices for 64GB at that speed seem reasonable.

M
Marian1703
Member
64
02-17-2016, 05:19 AM
#4
Since the goal is to minimize cost and complexity, ranking interleaving performs better without significant slowdown.
M
Marian1703
02-17-2016, 05:19 AM #4

Since the goal is to minimize cost and complexity, ranking interleaving performs better without significant slowdown.

X
xWaseem09
Member
161
02-19-2016, 04:33 AM
#5
We offer a range of CPUs, some capable of running at 2400 and others that cap at 2133.
X
xWaseem09
02-19-2016, 04:33 AM #5

We offer a range of CPUs, some capable of running at 2400 and others that cap at 2133.

N
NooLele
Posting Freak
847
02-23-2016, 02:15 AM
#6
These dual Xeons reach a maximum of 2400 MHz with ECC support as specified in Intel's documentation.
N
NooLele
02-23-2016, 02:15 AM #6

These dual Xeons reach a maximum of 2400 MHz with ECC support as specified in Intel's documentation.

H
HazardFTW
Junior Member
1
02-23-2016, 02:31 AM
#7
same frequency makes it quicker, you might need to check the fineprint to confirm if it can handle 2400 at a 4C2R setup. I understand that adding more ranks can reduce memory bandwidth performance.
H
HazardFTW
02-23-2016, 02:31 AM #7

same frequency makes it quicker, you might need to check the fineprint to confirm if it can handle 2400 at a 4C2R setup. I understand that adding more ranks can reduce memory bandwidth performance.

S
SuperTigresss
Posting Freak
768
03-01-2016, 02:27 AM
#8
I've worked with those before. I have 18 drives—9 for each CPU and 3 for each channel—in a legacy server using DDR3-1333. They're running at 800MHz, which is fine. Appreciate the feedback!
S
SuperTigresss
03-01-2016, 02:27 AM #8

I've worked with those before. I have 18 drives—9 for each CPU and 3 for each channel—in a legacy server using DDR3-1333. They're running at 800MHz, which is fine. Appreciate the feedback!

D
debilo
Member
52
03-04-2016, 02:56 AM
#9
16GB DDR4 DIMMs offer strong dependability. If you can afford to buy a 8x16GB set and either dispose of or keep it, the 8x16GB choice is better. I’d choose the more expensive version with fewer uncertainties—it’s the 8x16GB option.
D
debilo
03-04-2016, 02:56 AM #9

16GB DDR4 DIMMs offer strong dependability. If you can afford to buy a 8x16GB set and either dispose of or keep it, the 8x16GB choice is better. I’d choose the more expensive version with fewer uncertainties—it’s the 8x16GB option.

A
ArkioXD
Member
53
03-04-2016, 04:38 AM
#10
I recently purchased 128GB RAM at a reasonable cost, and it makes sense to keep the number of sticks minimal—like one per channel. From my experience with x99 and Ryzen, adding more sticks often causes issues, such as reduced performance per channel or problems elsewhere in the pipeline.
A
ArkioXD
03-04-2016, 04:38 AM #10

I recently purchased 128GB RAM at a reasonable cost, and it makes sense to keep the number of sticks minimal—like one per channel. From my experience with x99 and Ryzen, adding more sticks often causes issues, such as reduced performance per channel or problems elsewhere in the pipeline.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next