Cascade Lake X will be available at the specified location starting from [insert date].
Cascade Lake X will be available at the specified location starting from [insert date].
they're deceiving since that processor isn't real, but fine, we cautioned you, presented proof, even attempting to clarify the theoretical angle it's up to you
They mentioned the i9 9900K is better than the i9 10900X. The upcoming mainstream i9 10900K 10c/20t, made possible by Ring Bus, should likely surpass the i9 10920X... or vice versa. Choose what suits you best.
Stock is fine. Performance shines with well-tuned X299 chips, as noted by owners who experiment and compare them in gaming. For video editing, it would lag since QuickSync isn’t available. It’s the only task I do regularly on my rig—mainly for hobbyist purposes. Rendering speed isn’t a priority for me, so I don’t stress about output times. My setup is already more than enough; I mainly enjoy overclocking and pushing benchmarks by redlining everything. Plus, I just prefer Intel’s X chipsets without a strong reason otherwise.
I made it simpler for you. Try opening Photoshop at 120 by 100 inches with 300 DPI for printing. Navigate to the Typetool, set the start typing to 5400 pixels, type your sentence, then adjust again. You’ll notice “rendering type” appears frequently—just tweak a few letters and their positions. This works even on an empty canvas. When creating large banners, saving time between movements can save hours. The biggest annoyance is waiting a few seconds after each click. In this scenario, memory speed and single-core performance were most important. My friend’s 3600X performed better than mine for Photoshop, while my 7800X matched up with a 4790K. If I’m a video editor, I’d choose a Threadripper. But since I work with multimedia, I prioritize PCI-E lanes, single-core speed, multi-core speed, and ideally AVX-512 support (though Threadripper can handle that). Also, hardware stability matters. Yes or no—AVX 512 plugins will likely run much faster on the 10900X. Any tool that supports AVX 512 should be a clear winner. Ultimately, this discussion veered off track, so I’m ending here. What I needed was to find out where I can get a 10920X machine and people kept pushing Ryzen as the answer. Lol
For changing the board, you could install a Threadripper and run your existing X299 for Intel-compatible applications.