F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Cable modem and router device

Cable modem and router device

Cable modem and router device

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
X
xTripleMinerx
Posting Freak
846
02-04-2020, 06:13 AM
#1
I’m considering switching away from the Xfinity modem-router combo because it costs a lot. I’ve been researching online and found the Netgear CM700. I plan to pair it with an Exo AC2600 MU-MIMO router. They look suitable for handling the mix of devices we have—several AC units and many Wi-Fi 802.11n gadgets. This should help all our devices connect smoothly without interference. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
X
xTripleMinerx
02-04-2020, 06:13 AM #1

I’m considering switching away from the Xfinity modem-router combo because it costs a lot. I’ve been researching online and found the Netgear CM700. I plan to pair it with an Exo AC2600 MU-MIMO router. They look suitable for handling the mix of devices we have—several AC units and many Wi-Fi 802.11n gadgets. This should help all our devices connect smoothly without interference. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

E
Einhorn_Kevin
Member
94
02-06-2020, 04:56 AM
#2
You don't need to worry about interference from other devices. Focus on positioning the air conditioners nearer to the router than the N, since the 5GHz signal isn't as powerful as the 2.4GHz one.
E
Einhorn_Kevin
02-06-2020, 04:56 AM #2

You don't need to worry about interference from other devices. Focus on positioning the air conditioners nearer to the router than the N, since the 5GHz signal isn't as powerful as the 2.4GHz one.

C
CiaoCow
Member
129
02-06-2020, 07:37 PM
#3
Check the setup is correct. Use Cat5e or Cat6 cables for your equipment.
C
CiaoCow
02-06-2020, 07:37 PM #3

Check the setup is correct. Use Cat5e or Cat6 cables for your equipment.

W
waderlax
Junior Member
43
02-08-2020, 09:25 PM
#4
What rates do you charge? I'm wondering since your gigabit plan uses a modem that won't function. Even though it's rated for 1.4Gbps, they won't allow a DOCSIS 3.0 device, so you'll need a 3.1 model. If you don't pay for or intend to use a gigabit cable plan, then the CM700 works fine. Note: I overlooked the Puma6 chipset in my previous comment.
W
waderlax
02-08-2020, 09:25 PM #4

What rates do you charge? I'm wondering since your gigabit plan uses a modem that won't function. Even though it's rated for 1.4Gbps, they won't allow a DOCSIS 3.0 device, so you'll need a 3.1 model. If you don't pay for or intend to use a gigabit cable plan, then the CM700 works fine. Note: I overlooked the Puma6 chipset in my previous comment.

R
RJBboy
Junior Member
47
02-08-2020, 09:39 PM
#5
Remember that N works the same across 5GHz, so they might already be using it, which could mean better performance even at the same distance. In my opinion, it’s better to hold off until the end of the year when 802.11ax version 1 routers are expected, as improvements for both 2.4GHz and 5GHz will be much welcome.
R
RJBboy
02-08-2020, 09:39 PM #5

Remember that N works the same across 5GHz, so they might already be using it, which could mean better performance even at the same distance. In my opinion, it’s better to hold off until the end of the year when 802.11ax version 1 routers are expected, as improvements for both 2.4GHz and 5GHz will be much welcome.

B
blondeminion
Senior Member
594
02-10-2020, 11:11 AM
#6
I notice one problem with the CM700, 32 Channel Docsis 3.0 modems—it seems they rely on the Intel Puma 6 chip, which appears to be faulty. Reports indicate severe latency problems, and despite software updates, the core design issue seems unresolved by Intel. For a reliable 32 Channel connection, consider Docsis 3.1 modems instead. If you need a 24 Channel option, safer choices are available.
B
blondeminion
02-10-2020, 11:11 AM #6

I notice one problem with the CM700, 32 Channel Docsis 3.0 modems—it seems they rely on the Intel Puma 6 chip, which appears to be faulty. Reports indicate severe latency problems, and despite software updates, the core design issue seems unresolved by Intel. For a reliable 32 Channel connection, consider Docsis 3.1 modems instead. If you need a 24 Channel option, safer choices are available.

C
ChickenPhoYou
Posting Freak
850
02-11-2020, 04:26 AM
#7
You only have the 250 Mbs plan, but the Puma chipset seems problematic—why would it remain available?
C
ChickenPhoYou
02-11-2020, 04:26 AM #7

You only have the 250 Mbs plan, but the Puma chipset seems problematic—why would it remain available?

B
Bap56
Member
58
02-11-2020, 07:08 AM
#8
Someone has insight into this. I believe Charter is using Puma 6 modems, which is normal. The reality is that Arris is facing lawsuits related to the SB6190 and its Puma 6 problems.
B
Bap56
02-11-2020, 07:08 AM #8

Someone has insight into this. I believe Charter is using Puma 6 modems, which is normal. The reality is that Arris is facing lawsuits related to the SB6190 and its Puma 6 problems.

M
mistercraft77
Posting Freak
900
03-01-2020, 11:22 AM
#9
I checked and found the mb7621 Motorola 24x8, but it might not be the best option.
M
mistercraft77
03-01-2020, 11:22 AM #9

I checked and found the mb7621 Motorola 24x8, but it might not be the best option.

D
Delgronax
Member
56
03-01-2020, 12:45 PM
#10
Doesn't include Puma 6, which improves things a lot. Although I own a Motorola modem, it's not the same as before. I believe Zoom holds the brand now. The Surfboard banding was acquired by Arris. I say the modem functions, but many people I've met think the SB6183 (16x4), CM500 (16x4), CM600 (24x8) are better options.
D
Delgronax
03-01-2020, 12:45 PM #10

Doesn't include Puma 6, which improves things a lot. Although I own a Motorola modem, it's not the same as before. I believe Zoom holds the brand now. The Surfboard banding was acquired by Arris. I say the modem functions, but many people I've met think the SB6183 (16x4), CM500 (16x4), CM600 (24x8) are better options.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next