F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Assistance in boosting the AMD FX4130 CPU performance using a standard cooler

Assistance in boosting the AMD FX4130 CPU performance using a standard cooler

Assistance in boosting the AMD FX4130 CPU performance using a standard cooler

T
Thyr0
Junior Member
38
08-06-2016, 06:40 AM
#1
System specifications
CPU: AMD FX 4130 @3.8ghz (With stock cooler)
Core Voltage: 1.368V
GPU: RX 560 2GB
RAM: DDR3 Kingston 8GB 1600MHz + 4GB = 12GB RAM
OS: Windows 7
MOBO: 760GM-P23 (FX)
BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. V17.17
Temperature in Arma 3 [Ultra, 1080p]: 35/40°C
I plan to safely increase the CPU speed using AMD OverDrive software. This is my first time overclocking, so I’m seeking advice from the community. Screenshots are appreciated. I’m aiming for around 4.3ghz, but only if it’s safe.
Regards.
T
Thyr0
08-06-2016, 06:40 AM #1

System specifications
CPU: AMD FX 4130 @3.8ghz (With stock cooler)
Core Voltage: 1.368V
GPU: RX 560 2GB
RAM: DDR3 Kingston 8GB 1600MHz + 4GB = 12GB RAM
OS: Windows 7
MOBO: 760GM-P23 (FX)
BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. V17.17
Temperature in Arma 3 [Ultra, 1080p]: 35/40°C
I plan to safely increase the CPU speed using AMD OverDrive software. This is my first time overclocking, so I’m seeking advice from the community. Screenshots are appreciated. I’m aiming for around 4.3ghz, but only if it’s safe.
Regards.

H
Hades666201
Member
175
08-06-2016, 09:35 AM
#2
Initially, it's important to note that this component generates significant heat. The existing cooler isn't suitable for overclocking; it only covers the basics. Using this motherboard for overclocking is also not recommended.
H
Hades666201
08-06-2016, 09:35 AM #2

Initially, it's important to note that this component generates significant heat. The existing cooler isn't suitable for overclocking; it only covers the basics. Using this motherboard for overclocking is also not recommended.

F
FlameSquid32
Senior Member
501
08-06-2016, 10:59 AM
#3
^+1 agreed with his statement. Your heat sink isn't sufficient. The VRM on your motherboard lacks proper heat sinks. You're likely to cause the processor to overheat until it slows down or damages the VRM module.
If you don’t care about the parts and are okay with breaking them, I can share some guides.
This is just about wanting to learn about building a system, even if it fails.
But you should take responsibility if you end up destroying your setup by pushing it too hard.
I’ve been overclocking since 1996, so I understand the dangers—your equipment won’t handle a real overclock.
F
FlameSquid32
08-06-2016, 10:59 AM #3

^+1 agreed with his statement. Your heat sink isn't sufficient. The VRM on your motherboard lacks proper heat sinks. You're likely to cause the processor to overheat until it slows down or damages the VRM module.
If you don’t care about the parts and are okay with breaking them, I can share some guides.
This is just about wanting to learn about building a system, even if it fails.
But you should take responsibility if you end up destroying your setup by pushing it too hard.
I’ve been overclocking since 1996, so I understand the dangers—your equipment won’t handle a real overclock.

A
agamergoddess
Junior Member
25
08-06-2016, 11:08 AM
#4
I think your motherboard and CPU are likely limited to a maximum of 95W, which suggests a VCore of around 1.425V. Turn off Core Performance Boost, APM, CStates, HPC, C1E, and enable CPU unlock. Set VCore to 1.425V. BCLK at 200 MHz. Begin with multi-threading at 20.0x Cinebench to verify stability. Monitor with HWmonitor and ensure the CPU temperature stays below 71°C. The fan should run quite loudly. I believe your CPU might settle in the 4.1 to 4.3 GHz range. Good luck!
A
agamergoddess
08-06-2016, 11:08 AM #4

I think your motherboard and CPU are likely limited to a maximum of 95W, which suggests a VCore of around 1.425V. Turn off Core Performance Boost, APM, CStates, HPC, C1E, and enable CPU unlock. Set VCore to 1.425V. BCLK at 200 MHz. Begin with multi-threading at 20.0x Cinebench to verify stability. Monitor with HWmonitor and ensure the CPU temperature stays below 71°C. The fan should run quite loudly. I believe your CPU might settle in the 4.1 to 4.3 GHz range. Good luck!

K
kevenin12
Member
115
08-06-2016, 01:02 PM
#5
Thank you for the update, in BIOS I adjusted the 200mhz setting to 20x and achieved around 4.0Ghz. For now, I'll keep this straightforward overclock that increased from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Appreciate the help!
K
kevenin12
08-06-2016, 01:02 PM #5

Thank you for the update, in BIOS I adjusted the 200mhz setting to 20x and achieved around 4.0Ghz. For now, I'll keep this straightforward overclock that increased from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Appreciate the help!

I
iDoNotEvenLift
Posting Freak
936
08-12-2016, 10:46 PM
#6
Here’s your message rewritten with the same length and structure:

Thank you for every reply. In BIOS I adjusted the multiplier from 200mhz to 20x, aiming for a 4.0Ghz. For now I’ll keep this straightforward overclock that raised it from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Thanks everyone.

I’m like you—just give it a try. But I also understand there were rough VRM setups in the AM2 and AM3 eras that didn’t offer strong protection. Everything was fine until the power-hungry Bulldozer/FX 6 and 8 core processors arrived, and without proper safeguards the FETs would overheat or even catch fire. Asus and Gigabyte boards were more reliable because they included VRM protection that limited CPU speed or caused shutdowns, though MSI had a bad reputation back then. Proceed with caution.

Not having a good CPU cooler might actually be an advantage since the CPU would quickly overheat and throttle, preserving performance. So go ahead.
I
iDoNotEvenLift
08-12-2016, 10:46 PM #6

Here’s your message rewritten with the same length and structure:

Thank you for every reply. In BIOS I adjusted the multiplier from 200mhz to 20x, aiming for a 4.0Ghz. For now I’ll keep this straightforward overclock that raised it from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Thanks everyone.

I’m like you—just give it a try. But I also understand there were rough VRM setups in the AM2 and AM3 eras that didn’t offer strong protection. Everything was fine until the power-hungry Bulldozer/FX 6 and 8 core processors arrived, and without proper safeguards the FETs would overheat or even catch fire. Asus and Gigabyte boards were more reliable because they included VRM protection that limited CPU speed or caused shutdowns, though MSI had a bad reputation back then. Proceed with caution.

Not having a good CPU cooler might actually be an advantage since the CPU would quickly overheat and throttle, preserving performance. So go ahead.

D
228
08-14-2016, 08:50 PM
#7
Here you go, thank you for your feedback. In BIOS I adjusted the multiplier from 200mhz to 20x, aiming for a 4.0Ghz speed. I’ll keep using this straightforward overclock that raised it from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Thanks!

Now you’re hooked—there’s no fix. Be gentle with the voltage settings. Each processor has its ideal range. Your chip is already quite hot, starting at 125 watts before overclocking.

If you know how to reset the BIOS, you might try a slightly lower voltage. In the silicone lottery, you never know when you’ll get a "Golden Sample"—I’ve had a few in the past.

Also, I fried a couple of MSI boards running stock with full CPU load 24/7. The VRMs burned on both.

Wishing you success in your learning journey and enjoy this new challenge!
D
Danieltowersxd
08-14-2016, 08:50 PM #7

Here you go, thank you for your feedback. In BIOS I adjusted the multiplier from 200mhz to 20x, aiming for a 4.0Ghz speed. I’ll keep using this straightforward overclock that raised it from 3.8ghz to 4.0ghz with just a 5-degree variation. Thanks!

Now you’re hooked—there’s no fix. Be gentle with the voltage settings. Each processor has its ideal range. Your chip is already quite hot, starting at 125 watts before overclocking.

If you know how to reset the BIOS, you might try a slightly lower voltage. In the silicone lottery, you never know when you’ll get a "Golden Sample"—I’ve had a few in the past.

Also, I fried a couple of MSI boards running stock with full CPU load 24/7. The VRMs burned on both.

Wishing you success in your learning journey and enjoy this new challenge!

L
Lieezy
Member
64
08-15-2016, 02:06 AM
#8
This guide offers an overview of CPU overclocking.
L
Lieezy
08-15-2016, 02:06 AM #8

This guide offers an overview of CPU overclocking.

M
193
08-15-2016, 07:04 AM
#9
Wow, looks like the 4300 series CPU isn't generating as much heat as I'm seeing here. Have you all used or even increased its speed before? I think it's safe to say that overclocking it won't provide significant performance improvements. You might be able to reach around 4.5 Ghz using a stock cooler, but don't expect to exceed that. With AMD chips, temperatures can stay within normal ranges—some even reach 80°C without problems. Just keep the voltage below 1.55V or you risk damaging the CPU.

Personally, I've had a 4350 FX on stock HSFI and managed to hit 4.5 Ghz while staying under temperature limits. Remember, how much you can overclock depends on the chip's quality (CPU selection). I pushed it to 5.0 Ghz stable, which needed a closed-loop liquid cooler. Even then, it lagged behind an i3 at that time. As an AMD fan, I enjoy pushing my chips to their limits.

To really enhance performance, you'll need to combine CPU, FSB, RAM, and GPU overclocking. When I was using that setup, I set the FSB to 270/RAM to 2100Mhz and the GPU to 2100Mhz. This definitely boosted overall speed, though it took a lot of time (testing, benchmarks, stress tests, retries). For the FSB, you'll need a better motherboard with superior VRM cooling, or else you might start throttling. Always do overclocking from the BIOS—using software can cause excessive voltage boosts and aggressive VRM settings, which will lead to overheating.

I know this discussion is old, but I find it frustrating when people don't provide accurate information or complete details. Hope this helps!
M
McGamerPro2000
08-15-2016, 07:04 AM #9

Wow, looks like the 4300 series CPU isn't generating as much heat as I'm seeing here. Have you all used or even increased its speed before? I think it's safe to say that overclocking it won't provide significant performance improvements. You might be able to reach around 4.5 Ghz using a stock cooler, but don't expect to exceed that. With AMD chips, temperatures can stay within normal ranges—some even reach 80°C without problems. Just keep the voltage below 1.55V or you risk damaging the CPU.

Personally, I've had a 4350 FX on stock HSFI and managed to hit 4.5 Ghz while staying under temperature limits. Remember, how much you can overclock depends on the chip's quality (CPU selection). I pushed it to 5.0 Ghz stable, which needed a closed-loop liquid cooler. Even then, it lagged behind an i3 at that time. As an AMD fan, I enjoy pushing my chips to their limits.

To really enhance performance, you'll need to combine CPU, FSB, RAM, and GPU overclocking. When I was using that setup, I set the FSB to 270/RAM to 2100Mhz and the GPU to 2100Mhz. This definitely boosted overall speed, though it took a lot of time (testing, benchmarks, stress tests, retries). For the FSB, you'll need a better motherboard with superior VRM cooling, or else you might start throttling. Always do overclocking from the BIOS—using software can cause excessive voltage boosts and aggressive VRM settings, which will lead to overheating.

I know this discussion is old, but I find it frustrating when people don't provide accurate information or complete details. Hope this helps!

T
ThorGamer60
Junior Member
5
08-16-2016, 01:14 AM
#10
It isn't about whether his chip will not overclock.
His board supports a 95-watt CPU.
Before overclocking, his CPU was already a 125-watt unit.
He is currently reaching the maximum capacity of his board's VRMs.
Any serious overclocking could damage the motherboard.
T
ThorGamer60
08-16-2016, 01:14 AM #10

It isn't about whether his chip will not overclock.
His board supports a 95-watt CPU.
Before overclocking, his CPU was already a 125-watt unit.
He is currently reaching the maximum capacity of his board's VRMs.
Any serious overclocking could damage the motherboard.