F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Assist with overclocking CPU (i5 2550k) and DDR3 1600 RAM using Intel Visual Bios.

Assist with overclocking CPU (i5 2550k) and DDR3 1600 RAM using Intel Visual Bios.

Assist with overclocking CPU (i5 2550k) and DDR3 1600 RAM using Intel Visual Bios.

O
ohRealize
Member
71
09-17-2017, 09:46 AM
#1
I recently made a change to my system by installing a new motherboard, CPU, cooler, and power supply after experiencing damage to my previous components. The upgrade wasn’t extensive since I was uncertain about the extent of the damage and preferred to keep as many parts as possible intact. However, I ended up replacing both the CPU and motherboard (almost everything). Still, I managed to upgrade from an I5 2400 to an i5 2550K CPU.

I haven’t overclocked before, but I’m planning to do so now to maximize performance. I also discovered that the RAM I had was underclocked by default and would like to push it to its standard speed. My new motherboard is an Intel DZ77BH-55K, and I updated its BIOS to the latest version, Intel Visual Bios.

Intel Visual Bios appears to simplify the overclocking process with a straightforward slider ranging from 3.8 GHz (default) to 4.5 GHz. However, based on my understanding, using only this slider affects the Turboboost speed and may not be the optimal approach. I’m seeking guidance on whether this is the best method or if there’s another way to proceed. I intend to run Prime95 for 30 minutes afterward to check stability and use Speccy to keep an eye on temperatures.

Before starting, I’d appreciate any advice or details I can gather. Additionally, should I adjust the fan speed within the BIOS? There’s a simple setting in Visual Bios that I’m considering. At current speeds, it’s already running around 70°C under load.

Here’s my RAM information: 4x4GB
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...6820233180

There’s a slider in the BIOS for RAM that can be set to 1600, and also an option for an XMP-1600 profile in the Performance Memory Profile dropdown. These two settings give different results. Which one should I choose?

Lastly, how much will these overclocking adjustments affect power consumption? That’s what concerns me since I downgraded my PSU from 750W to 650W (the latter was the spare I had on hand). Luckily, I believe the original 750W was sufficient before, and the new 650W should be adequate now. Thank you all for your suggestions!
O
ohRealize
09-17-2017, 09:46 AM #1

I recently made a change to my system by installing a new motherboard, CPU, cooler, and power supply after experiencing damage to my previous components. The upgrade wasn’t extensive since I was uncertain about the extent of the damage and preferred to keep as many parts as possible intact. However, I ended up replacing both the CPU and motherboard (almost everything). Still, I managed to upgrade from an I5 2400 to an i5 2550K CPU.

I haven’t overclocked before, but I’m planning to do so now to maximize performance. I also discovered that the RAM I had was underclocked by default and would like to push it to its standard speed. My new motherboard is an Intel DZ77BH-55K, and I updated its BIOS to the latest version, Intel Visual Bios.

Intel Visual Bios appears to simplify the overclocking process with a straightforward slider ranging from 3.8 GHz (default) to 4.5 GHz. However, based on my understanding, using only this slider affects the Turboboost speed and may not be the optimal approach. I’m seeking guidance on whether this is the best method or if there’s another way to proceed. I intend to run Prime95 for 30 minutes afterward to check stability and use Speccy to keep an eye on temperatures.

Before starting, I’d appreciate any advice or details I can gather. Additionally, should I adjust the fan speed within the BIOS? There’s a simple setting in Visual Bios that I’m considering. At current speeds, it’s already running around 70°C under load.

Here’s my RAM information: 4x4GB
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...6820233180

There’s a slider in the BIOS for RAM that can be set to 1600, and also an option for an XMP-1600 profile in the Performance Memory Profile dropdown. These two settings give different results. Which one should I choose?

Lastly, how much will these overclocking adjustments affect power consumption? That’s what concerns me since I downgraded my PSU from 750W to 650W (the latter was the spare I had on hand). Luckily, I believe the original 750W was sufficient before, and the new 650W should be adequate now. Thank you all for your suggestions!

T
52
09-18-2017, 12:05 PM
#2
These are the BIOS configurations for my CPU, with all settings except Processor VR Droop Control remaining at their defaults. The only changes were setting VR Droop Control to Low instead of High, as saving power is not a main concern for me.
T
The_Metal_Wolf
09-18-2017, 12:05 PM #2

These are the BIOS configurations for my CPU, with all settings except Processor VR Droop Control remaining at their defaults. The only changes were setting VR Droop Control to Low instead of High, as saving power is not a main concern for me.

W
War_Car
Member
104
09-21-2017, 08:19 PM
#3
So far I haven't adjusted my CPU's overclocking settings. I installed the XMP 1600 profile for my RAM, thinking it would meet the manufacturer's requirements (the RAM reads the profile directly). I found something concerning though. My CPU is still running at BIOS default speeds, but readings from CPU-Z show a Core Voltage of 1.32 V under load, which varies between 1.312 V and 1.32 V. Temperatures are also climbing to around 75°C. This is the standard setting for my 3.8 GHz Turbo at 0 voltage offset. I didn't modify BIOS settings beyond adjusting Vdroop, so I assumed that change might be affecting performance. I tried reverting Vdroop to the default 'High' value, but it didn’t improve things. These high Vcore readings are essentially pushing other users with the same processor into overclocking mode. They’re close to the safe limit, leaving little room for further voltage increases if I decide to overclock later. My concerns are about whether these values are typical or problematic. For a stock configuration, what Vcore should I expect? And since the current readings are already near the maximum safe level, can I safely experiment with higher core multipliers without raising the voltage?
W
War_Car
09-21-2017, 08:19 PM #3

So far I haven't adjusted my CPU's overclocking settings. I installed the XMP 1600 profile for my RAM, thinking it would meet the manufacturer's requirements (the RAM reads the profile directly). I found something concerning though. My CPU is still running at BIOS default speeds, but readings from CPU-Z show a Core Voltage of 1.32 V under load, which varies between 1.312 V and 1.32 V. Temperatures are also climbing to around 75°C. This is the standard setting for my 3.8 GHz Turbo at 0 voltage offset. I didn't modify BIOS settings beyond adjusting Vdroop, so I assumed that change might be affecting performance. I tried reverting Vdroop to the default 'High' value, but it didn’t improve things. These high Vcore readings are essentially pushing other users with the same processor into overclocking mode. They’re close to the safe limit, leaving little room for further voltage increases if I decide to overclock later. My concerns are about whether these values are typical or problematic. For a stock configuration, what Vcore should I expect? And since the current readings are already near the maximum safe level, can I safely experiment with higher core multipliers without raising the voltage?