F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop AMD Zen 3

AMD Zen 3

AMD Zen 3

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
A
awesomeboy2016
Junior Member
17
04-25-2018, 03:09 AM
#11
AMD verified B450 compatibility; Asus will need to integrate it into their boards, so monitor their updates for new processor releases.
A
awesomeboy2016
04-25-2018, 03:09 AM #11

AMD verified B450 compatibility; Asus will need to integrate it into their boards, so monitor their updates for new processor releases.

J
jackster770
Member
139
04-25-2018, 09:09 AM
#12
I noticed the prices on the latest chips and chuckled. I won’t expect $500 from an 8-core, 16-thread CPU. Since I stream at 1440p, the gap won’t be very noticeable.
J
jackster770
04-25-2018, 09:09 AM #12

I noticed the prices on the latest chips and chuckled. I won’t expect $500 from an 8-core, 16-thread CPU. Since I stream at 1440p, the gap won’t be very noticeable.

T
theactrics
Junior Member
13
04-25-2018, 12:25 PM
#13
What about a CPU that matches the 10900K but isn’t too basic for your needs? (Also, this is the $450 model, not the $550.)
T
theactrics
04-25-2018, 12:25 PM #13

What about a CPU that matches the 10900K but isn’t too basic for your needs? (Also, this is the $450 model, not the $550.)

M
MonkeyMan1125
Member
81
04-25-2018, 12:49 PM
#14
It’s almost $500 with the added fees.
M
MonkeyMan1125
04-25-2018, 12:49 PM #14

It’s almost $500 with the added fees.

R
Rosie_The_Fox
Member
213
04-30-2018, 05:48 PM
#15
The concern is about launching an 8-core, 16-thread component at 320 units. The newer version with 8 cores adds 120-130 extra cost over a half-year period, which is quite expensive.
R
Rosie_The_Fox
04-30-2018, 05:48 PM #15

The concern is about launching an 8-core, 16-thread component at 320 units. The newer version with 8 cores adds 120-130 extra cost over a half-year period, which is quite expensive.

R
RediiN
Member
79
05-04-2018, 12:45 PM
#16
It doesn’t matter if it matches the top desktop CPU since it has two fewer cores. That’s just nonsense.
R
RediiN
05-04-2018, 12:45 PM #16

It doesn’t matter if it matches the top desktop CPU since it has two fewer cores. That’s just nonsense.

D
drakularrr
Member
50
05-04-2018, 01:01 PM
#17
It was the R7 3700X. The R7 3800X cost $399 when it came out, making the 5800X about $50 more. A 5700X is probably closer to $379 if they launch one next.
D
drakularrr
05-04-2018, 01:01 PM #17

It was the R7 3700X. The R7 3800X cost $399 when it came out, making the 5800X about $50 more. A 5700X is probably closer to $379 if they launch one next.

J
jasper_de_king
Junior Member
12
05-04-2018, 03:10 PM
#18
yeah but as i stated somewhere else too. the 3700x was pretty much comparable with the 3800x. the 3800x was then a useless buy especially at that price. and now they want to charge you even 120 more for an 8 core? in 2020?
J
jasper_de_king
05-04-2018, 03:10 PM #18

yeah but as i stated somewhere else too. the 3700x was pretty much comparable with the 3800x. the 3800x was then a useless buy especially at that price. and now they want to charge you even 120 more for an 8 core? in 2020?

K
kcristan
Senior Member
514
05-04-2018, 08:11 PM
#19
The $70 gap remained even after the 3700X and 3800X were introduced. A 5700X would likely make it more affordable later on.
K
kcristan
05-04-2018, 08:11 PM #19

The $70 gap remained even after the 3700X and 3800X were introduced. A 5700X would likely make it more affordable later on.

Z
Zapster_Games
Junior Member
2
05-05-2018, 12:01 AM
#20
they don't focus on that. it's compared to the 10700k, not the 10900k. their slides mentioned it matches the 10700k in gaming at 1080p... okay? So it won't surpass the 10900k. Instead, they're moving to the 10850k, which is currently on the market for about $450. That's a reasonable price for an 8-core processor in 2020? That seems quite far from what you expect. It doesn't seem worth it. And honestly, most people with these high-end parts don't play at 1080p.
Z
Zapster_Games
05-05-2018, 12:01 AM #20

they don't focus on that. it's compared to the 10700k, not the 10900k. their slides mentioned it matches the 10700k in gaming at 1080p... okay? So it won't surpass the 10900k. Instead, they're moving to the 10850k, which is currently on the market for about $450. That's a reasonable price for an 8-core processor in 2020? That seems quite far from what you expect. It doesn't seem worth it. And honestly, most people with these high-end parts don't play at 1080p.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next