AMD FX 8300 is a mid-range processor from AMD.
AMD FX 8300 is a mid-range processor from AMD.
This AsRock N68-GS FX looks significantly inferior compared to what you expect. With an nVidia GeForce 7025 chipset, it feels like a much older design—almost as if it’s from the AM2 era rather than the newer AM2+ or even the 760G lineup. The VRM setup seems basic, only offering a standard 3-phase configuration without any advanced features like 2+1 or 3+1 phases. It probably just delivers a straightforward 3+0 power delivery.
It's interesting that the board allows for Phenom and FX processors.
Yea, even on my Formula-Z I shut cores down. That's what overclocking is about. But again, because obviously you missed it..... The 4+1 will be suitable for a stock FX-8300. Here's why Low power P states #1: 2900 MHz, 1.0625V #2: 2400 MHz, 0.9875V #3: 1900 MHz, 0.9125V #4: 1400 MHz, 0.825V Boosted P states [1] #1: 4200 MHz, 1.375V (A single core... just like Ryzen!! - But an actual P-state not governed by temps) #2: 3600 MHz, 1.2125V (2 or more cores, not necessarily all 8, work load dependent.) OP will be fine. He just wants a PC for school work and maybe light gaming. This setup is pretty cheap for a complete system. See above. The board I LN'ed was a 780G..... Black cpu socket AM3+ support. I know this hardware very well. The list of chips I've overclocked from the FX Line up (And daily use also) + some of them soldered de-lidded. FX-4100 (de-lidded) FX-4170 FX-4300 (de-lidded) FX-4350 FX-6300 (de-lidded FX-8300 (de-lidded) FX-8320 (de-lidded) FX-8350 FX-9590 x2 (de-lidded) Very well aware of power requirements of FX processors. OP will be fine. You can view the P-states above your quote there. The FX-8300 is a very low leaker and is not the power hog people make FX out to be.
I get what you're saying, but I'm just reminding him to improve his setup more clearly if he's planning to overclock. I don't really trust this board myself—it lacks USB 3 and SATA 3 ports, which he’ll probably notice. It’s up to the manufacturer whether he wants a PC or not, but I hope he can find a better option with improved components. How did removing those FX processors turn out for you? Did the cooling improve because the paste on those CPUs is good?
I completely understand the outdated feel of that setup. However, he's getting a full rig for around 280 dollars (roughly). That does sound like a decent value. Since it's already used, we can only rely on its worn reliability. I couldn't assemble a complete system on 300 dollars with anything beyond what he's planning to purchase. The funds might be better used for newer equipment, but saving could be tricky within a certain timeframe.
I generally prefer FX CPUs, but my issue is that buyers of 8-core models with budget boards often return upset about low FPS or stuttering. Frequently the problem lies with the board's VRMs causing the CPU to throttle, and they blame the CPU instead. If you decide to purchase that build, just avoid overclocking the CPU. You're correct about the 8300 being more power-efficient, but if you push it too hard on a board with weak VRMs, it simply can't handle it.
The FX IPC is actually lower than the Phenom II chips. The 1090T performed similarly to an FX-8350 in multi-core and speed per core. FX was a dream come true at 8GHz. I didn’t upgrade to LN2 on my premium board—it’s just a hobby, not a job. Manufacturers often give free gear so people can achieve better results without spending much. Many of them get top hardware from various makers, allowing them to outperform me by using less than $50 systems that still work well. That’s my approach to attracting new players interested in sub-zero performance. The first tip? Practice with budget-friendly equipment. You’ll still have fun.
You can typically increase your CPU's clock speed by about 0.5 to 1 GHz using a basic 3-heatpipe tower cooler, depending on the model and conditions.