Affordable top single-core CPU options available at lower prices.

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Affordable top single-core CPU options available at lower prices.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2

01-04-2018, 08:54 AM

#11

He focused only on single-core speed, and 4 to 6 cores seemed excessive. It costs around $159 compared to nearly $300 for something he doesn’t prioritize.

LouisPizarro

01-04-2018, 08:54 AM #11

He focused only on single-core speed, and 4 to 6 cores seemed excessive. It costs around $159 compared to nearly $300 for something he doesn’t prioritize.

Gladiador70
Senior Member

698

01-09-2018, 07:01 PM

#12

It offers similar single-core performance to an i7-9700K, though real-world results may vary based on workload and system load.

Gladiador70

01-09-2018, 07:01 PM #12

It offers similar single-core performance to an i7-9700K, though real-world results may vary based on workload and system load.

Aumarke
Junior Member

01-09-2018, 07:18 PM

#13

Identical at the same rate

Aumarke

01-09-2018, 07:18 PM #13

Identical at the same rate

LykkeXx
Junior Member

01-30-2018, 08:48 PM

#14

I thought the 10600k would work better because it has six cores, which is more than the 8 cores in the 9700k. I wondered if the 9700k would be preferable since it provides more cores for gaming or a server at the same cost.

LykkeXx

01-30-2018, 08:48 PM #14

ctobin8
Member

195

01-31-2018, 08:58 PM

#15

The focus was on single-core results. They're about the same number of cores, almost unchanged since Skylake. At that speed, single-core performance would look almost the same. A difference between 9.7GHz and 10.6GHz isn't noticeable unless software uses hyperthreading. The higher frequency model offers better cooling efficiency.

ctobin8

01-31-2018, 08:58 PM #15

Pages (2): Previous 1 2