F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Adjusting PCI overclock from 2.0 to 3.0 speeds?

Adjusting PCI overclock from 2.0 to 3.0 speeds?

Adjusting PCI overclock from 2.0 to 3.0 speeds?

J
Jarranield
Member
161
09-19-2016, 10:59 PM
#1
Yes, it could reach 3.0 speeds with the specified settings.
J
Jarranield
09-19-2016, 10:59 PM #1

Yes, it could reach 3.0 speeds with the specified settings.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
09-21-2016, 06:00 AM
#2
You won't be able to achieve that high speed easily, as reaching a PCIe rate of 200MHz isn't feasible and would likely cause problems.
S
snuttisnutti
09-21-2016, 06:00 AM #2

You won't be able to achieve that high speed easily, as reaching a PCIe rate of 200MHz isn't feasible and would likely cause problems.

D
DarkSideR91
Member
66
09-25-2016, 10:28 AM
#3
It doesn't make sense. Wouldn't people have praised PCIe overclocking much earlier if it were real?
D
DarkSideR91
09-25-2016, 10:28 AM #3

It doesn't make sense. Wouldn't people have praised PCIe overclocking much earlier if it were real?

L
LolaLouie
Senior Member
742
09-25-2016, 12:16 PM
#4
This process involves significant risks.
L
LolaLouie
09-25-2016, 12:16 PM #4

This process involves significant risks.

T
228
09-25-2016, 05:52 PM
#5
I was just wondering if you'd be interested in it once it becomes stable.
T
Thegamingnerds
09-25-2016, 05:52 PM #5

I was just wondering if you'd be interested in it once it becomes stable.

N
nathancraig7
Junior Member
18
09-25-2016, 11:46 PM
#6
Also check out what @Electronics Wizardy, @AbydosOne, and @aDoomGuy shared. Remember to avoid overclocking PCIe slots.
N
nathancraig7
09-25-2016, 11:46 PM #6

Also check out what @Electronics Wizardy, @AbydosOne, and @aDoomGuy shared. Remember to avoid overclocking PCIe slots.

T
Taddeljoy
Member
149
09-27-2016, 05:50 AM
#7
The response does not address your query. I recognize it's known to be unstable.
T
Taddeljoy
09-27-2016, 05:50 AM #7

The response does not address your query. I recognize it's known to be unstable.

M
54
10-02-2016, 11:55 AM
#8
In theory it could work, but it would cause frequent crashes and the benefits wouldn't justify it. If you're determined and manage stability, it could be a success, though I strongly advise against it.
M
MashedPotat0es
10-02-2016, 11:55 AM #8

In theory it could work, but it would cause frequent crashes and the benefits wouldn't justify it. If you're determined and manage stability, it could be a success, though I strongly advise against it.

G
Goku818
Junior Member
4
10-02-2016, 08:20 PM
#9
The core problem lies in the encoding used—PCIe 2.0 operates at 8/10, meaning eight bits of data are sent for every ten bits of electrical signal, with extra bits for error checking and padding. PCIe 3.0 is 128/130 encoded. Even with matching transfer rates, the receiving end wouldn't understand the signal format. Additionally, the jump from 2.0 to 3.0 isn't a straightforward doubling; it's about a 60% boost in symbol rate plus encoding efficiency gains that result in roughly a 1.97x speed increase instead of the expected 2x.
G
Goku818
10-02-2016, 08:20 PM #9

The core problem lies in the encoding used—PCIe 2.0 operates at 8/10, meaning eight bits of data are sent for every ten bits of electrical signal, with extra bits for error checking and padding. PCIe 3.0 is 128/130 encoded. Even with matching transfer rates, the receiving end wouldn't understand the signal format. Additionally, the jump from 2.0 to 3.0 isn't a straightforward doubling; it's about a 60% boost in symbol rate plus encoding efficiency gains that result in roughly a 1.97x speed increase instead of the expected 2x.

G
Giraf_
Junior Member
4
10-04-2016, 02:09 PM
#10
Beyond speed variations, explore the full picture: https://www.trentonsystems.com/blog/pci-...-interface https://www.anandtech.com/show/2412/3
G
Giraf_
10-04-2016, 02:09 PM #10

Beyond speed variations, explore the full picture: https://www.trentonsystems.com/blog/pci-...-interface https://www.anandtech.com/show/2412/3