F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Addressing stability issues during Haswell overclocking

Addressing stability issues during Haswell overclocking

Addressing stability issues during Haswell overclocking

X
220
05-19-2021, 05:02 PM
#1
I have a G3258 paired with an MSI B85 G43 Gaming motherboard. I've been checking guides about overclocking the Pentium Anniversary edition, and most suggest adjusting CPU RING RATIO and voltage. Through some research, I discovered that the ring ratio actually refers to the uncore. Many forums advise adding frequency and voltage to CPU RING, but during testing it caused instability and made the process very difficult. Should I continue tweaking it or stick with auto? Right now, I can reach 4 GHz easily when auto is enabled.
X
XxEmmyLouWhoxX
05-19-2021, 05:02 PM #1

I have a G3258 paired with an MSI B85 G43 Gaming motherboard. I've been checking guides about overclocking the Pentium Anniversary edition, and most suggest adjusting CPU RING RATIO and voltage. Through some research, I discovered that the ring ratio actually refers to the uncore. Many forums advise adding frequency and voltage to CPU RING, but during testing it caused instability and made the process very difficult. Should I continue tweaking it or stick with auto? Right now, I can reach 4 GHz easily when auto is enabled.

R
RetroPhobic
Junior Member
11
05-21-2021, 05:04 PM
#2
Keep it automatic, not a board built for overclocking, and no CPU.
R
RetroPhobic
05-21-2021, 05:04 PM #2

Keep it automatic, not a board built for overclocking, and no CPU.

G
Gustavgurra03
Posting Freak
815
05-21-2021, 05:36 PM
#3
Gingerbread:
It's not like it needs an auto setting, nor a motherboard built for overclocking, and definitely not a CPU. If you're saying that hitting 4.3 GHz so easily at 1.26v with just 60c is just a coincidence, then you're probably wrong.
G
Gustavgurra03
05-21-2021, 05:36 PM #3

Gingerbread:
It's not like it needs an auto setting, nor a motherboard built for overclocking, and definitely not a CPU. If you're saying that hitting 4.3 GHz so easily at 1.26v with just 60c is just a coincidence, then you're probably wrong.