F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking A suggested oc is provided for this.

A suggested oc is provided for this.

A suggested oc is provided for this.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
B
Ballin_
Junior Member
14
12-16-2016, 01:57 AM
#11
He uses a TX3 instead of a 212, which makes a big difference. The reading of 1.35 is too high. Starting from me, I set the target speed first and then adjusted the voltage to be stable. I configured my 4790K to 4.6 1.25 volts and got 4.6 1.22 V.
B
Ballin_
12-16-2016, 01:57 AM #11

He uses a TX3 instead of a 212, which makes a big difference. The reading of 1.35 is too high. Starting from me, I set the target speed first and then adjusted the voltage to be stable. I configured my 4790K to 4.6 1.25 volts and got 4.6 1.22 V.

3
3Edge
Senior Member
718
12-17-2016, 12:20 PM
#12
removed duplicate
3
3Edge
12-17-2016, 12:20 PM #12

removed duplicate

M
MarioCovrigel
Member
195
12-22-2016, 09:06 PM
#13
He has a TX3 instead of a 212, which makes a big difference. The 1.35 is quite high. Starting backwards, I set the target speed first and then adjusted the voltage. I used my 4790K at 4.6 1.25 volts and got 4.6 1.22 V. I think 212 can lower temperatures by about 5C more than the TX3 (8C during Prime95). But 1.35 is safe for a 6600k. Only stress testing will tell if this voltage will cause higher temps than the TX3. The TX3 should handle 1.35 Vcore unless it's running with overclocked memory and XMP enabled. He could begin at 1.3V and increase the multiplier until instability appears. If he reaches 4.5 and sees a blue screen but temps stay below 80C, he’ll likely raise the voltage back to 1.31 to try stabilizing. It’s another approach to reach the same conclusion. As long as temperatures stay under 1.35V, that’s the starting point I’d suggest.
M
MarioCovrigel
12-22-2016, 09:06 PM #13

He has a TX3 instead of a 212, which makes a big difference. The 1.35 is quite high. Starting backwards, I set the target speed first and then adjusted the voltage. I used my 4790K at 4.6 1.25 volts and got 4.6 1.22 V. I think 212 can lower temperatures by about 5C more than the TX3 (8C during Prime95). But 1.35 is safe for a 6600k. Only stress testing will tell if this voltage will cause higher temps than the TX3. The TX3 should handle 1.35 Vcore unless it's running with overclocked memory and XMP enabled. He could begin at 1.3V and increase the multiplier until instability appears. If he reaches 4.5 and sees a blue screen but temps stay below 80C, he’ll likely raise the voltage back to 1.31 to try stabilizing. It’s another approach to reach the same conclusion. As long as temperatures stay under 1.35V, that’s the starting point I’d suggest.

J
joan1431
Junior Member
13
12-23-2016, 10:56 PM
#14
I'm not sure about the situation. It seems my browser is posting multiple replies at once today. ?? My apologies.
J
joan1431
12-23-2016, 10:56 PM #14

I'm not sure about the situation. It seems my browser is posting multiple replies at once today. ?? My apologies.

E
168
12-24-2016, 05:00 AM
#15
removed duplicate
E
EpicBuilder110
12-24-2016, 05:00 AM #15

removed duplicate

Pages (2): Previous 1 2