F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks A single glance suggests the Ethernet port might be faulty.

A single glance suggests the Ethernet port might be faulty.

A single glance suggests the Ethernet port might be faulty.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
X
xStrafinq
Junior Member
4
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#11
You might use several network cards on your system. Windows will automatically connect to the one with a network cable attached. You can disable any by accessing Device Manager, right-clicking and choosing Disable. Many motherboards let you turn off the built-in network chip from BIOS, making it invisible in Windows or Device Manager—it's as if you remove the card physically. These inexpensive cards often contain standard chips that have been used for years; Windows usually detects and installs drivers automatically. If not, a CD might be included, and you may need to enable the PCI slot in BIOS just in case. It should be enabled by default for safety.
X
xStrafinq
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #11

You might use several network cards on your system. Windows will automatically connect to the one with a network cable attached. You can disable any by accessing Device Manager, right-clicking and choosing Disable. Many motherboards let you turn off the built-in network chip from BIOS, making it invisible in Windows or Device Manager—it's as if you remove the card physically. These inexpensive cards often contain standard chips that have been used for years; Windows usually detects and installs drivers automatically. If not, a CD might be included, and you may need to enable the PCI slot in BIOS just in case. It should be enabled by default for safety.

M
Mr_Gloku
Member
211
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#12
Smaller in size.
M
Mr_Gloku
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #12

Smaller in size.

M
Master949
Junior Member
44
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#13
It's PCI-e, he requires a PCI port. He has an available PCI-e slot, though it's blocked by the graphics card, making it unusable. In principle, a PCI-e adapter could work, but it would be costly and overly complicated—so not worth considering.
M
Master949
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #13

It's PCI-e, he requires a PCI port. He has an available PCI-e slot, though it's blocked by the graphics card, making it unusable. In principle, a PCI-e adapter could work, but it would be costly and overly complicated—so not worth considering.

S
superman81508
Junior Member
2
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#14
PCI isn't suitable for gigabit speeds; consider a USB gigabit adapter instead of relying on outdated PCI.
S
superman81508
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #14

PCI isn't suitable for gigabit speeds; consider a USB gigabit adapter instead of relying on outdated PCI.

A
arthussantos
Junior Member
46
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#15
PCI supports speeds up to 1 gbps. The typical PCI bus width is 32 bits and operates at 33 MHz, giving a theoretical max of about 133 MB/s. To reach 1 Gbps you'd need roughly 125 MB/s, which is below the 133 MB/s limit. USB would be slower—around 38 MB/s for USB 2.0 and possibly less with USB 3.0—but often unstable adapters cause issues. USB introduces more overhead and demands more CPU power, especially at high speeds. PCI and PCIe offer DMA and hardware handling, reducing CPU load. USB devices wait for the host to signal, while regular cards can initiate transfers immediately, resulting in lower latency and better performance. Edited May 28, 2019 by mariushm corrected some calculations.
A
arthussantos
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #15

PCI supports speeds up to 1 gbps. The typical PCI bus width is 32 bits and operates at 33 MHz, giving a theoretical max of about 133 MB/s. To reach 1 Gbps you'd need roughly 125 MB/s, which is below the 133 MB/s limit. USB would be slower—around 38 MB/s for USB 2.0 and possibly less with USB 3.0—but often unstable adapters cause issues. USB introduces more overhead and demands more CPU power, especially at high speeds. PCI and PCIe offer DMA and hardware handling, reducing CPU load. USB devices wait for the host to signal, while regular cards can initiate transfers immediately, resulting in lower latency and better performance. Edited May 28, 2019 by mariushm corrected some calculations.

D
Demacon
Junior Member
11
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#16
Thanks a lot for your support. A long time ago, I assembled numerous high-end PCs—perhaps 40 to 50 in the early 2000s. Then things slowed down and I stopped building, only to begin a straightforward open-air design in 2019. A lot has shifted, yet some aspects stay consistent. It feels fresh yet familiar, which is why I value your assistance. It’s similar to navigating a dark room you know well—everything has changed, but the core remains. Appreciate your help again. I’ll follow up and mention this thread just to confirm it helped. Cheers!
D
Demacon
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #16

Thanks a lot for your support. A long time ago, I assembled numerous high-end PCs—perhaps 40 to 50 in the early 2000s. Then things slowed down and I stopped building, only to begin a straightforward open-air design in 2019. A lot has shifted, yet some aspects stay consistent. It feels fresh yet familiar, which is why I value your assistance. It’s similar to navigating a dark room you know well—everything has changed, but the core remains. Appreciate your help again. I’ll follow up and mention this thread just to confirm it helped. Cheers!

L
Lovalie
Junior Member
11
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM
#17
That worked great... nice job. It brings back memories of an older motherboard with the same issue.
L
Lovalie
05-02-2024, 03:35 AM #17

That worked great... nice job. It brings back memories of an older motherboard with the same issue.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2