A 2-device or 3-device Wifi mesh setup would likely perform better for smaller spaces.
A 2-device or 3-device Wifi mesh setup would likely perform better for smaller spaces.
I relocated to a new home and noticed parts of my house aren’t getting full Wi-Fi coverage. I’m considering a Netgear Orbi mesh system but facing a decision between the RBK23 and RBK50 models. The RBK23 is a compact three-device setup using an AC2200, while the RBK50 is a larger two-device model with an AC3000. The RBK23 costs roughly $80 less than the RBK50. My main concern is whether the two-device RBK50 can match the coverage of the triple-device version. I believe having more devices should improve signal strength and reliability, allowing for better refresh cycles and closer placement. I plan to position the second device in the room without current coverage so it can also serve as an Ethernet connection, like a powerline adapter. I’m worried that the two-device model might still deliver slower speeds and weaker internet due to the lack of a relay node between devices.
Another option is the MikroTik Audience, which employs a comparable mesh network to the Netgear Orbi. It features a specialized Wi-Fi port for connecting devices: https://mikrotik.com/product/audience
Several US distributors carry MikroTik products, including Baltic: https://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-...point.html. A key advantage of MikroTik devices is that they provide future OS updates for all supported models. Unlike many other manufacturers, most discontinue support for older models after a few years, leaving no updates until you upgrade to a newer version. With MikroTik, you can anticipate updates lasting 6 to 10 years before replacement becomes necessary. The only architecture still unsupported is mipsle, as updates were halted to incorporate new features.
Apologies, it seems I misunderstood your message. You mentioned you believed you couldn't purchase something because you were in the US.