F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 7890xe versus Threadripper 2950X for gaming streaming and editingCompare performance options for high-end tasks

7890xe versus Threadripper 2950X for gaming streaming and editingCompare performance options for high-end tasks

7890xe versus Threadripper 2950X for gaming streaming and editingCompare performance options for high-end tasks

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
szymon124
Member
57
01-25-2018, 05:21 AM
#1
You're thinking about boosting your CPU for gaming, streaming, and video editing. Comparing the 7890Xe and 2950X is a good move. Which one fits your needs best?
S
szymon124
01-25-2018, 05:21 AM #1

You're thinking about boosting your CPU for gaming, streaming, and video editing. Comparing the 7890Xe and 2950X is a good move. Which one fits your needs best?

R
62
01-30-2018, 04:11 PM
#2
You really enjoy your 3950x with a lot of strength, plus some extra processing boosted on it.
R
Rainbow_Spikes
01-30-2018, 04:11 PM #2

You really enjoy your 3950x with a lot of strength, plus some extra processing boosted on it.

I
iZacksS
Member
174
01-31-2018, 03:17 AM
#3
I’d suggest avoiding both options. Opt for a 3900x or if possible, a 3950x. With a 2950x, the main benefit would be additional PCIe lanes and possibly more than 128 GB RAM—features you likely won’t need for a streaming and editing PC. A Ryzen 3rd generation chip should outperform a 2950x in gaming and even editing tasks, especially with its improved cache, higher clock speeds, and officially supported DDR4 memory (up to 3600 MHz). There aren’t many upgrade paths; older Threadripper models won’t benefit much from newer processors, and new ones use different sockets. Regarding Intel, I’m unsure but expect it would be more power-hungry with fewer PCIe lanes and RAM upgrades. It probably wouldn’t tip the scales in your favor.
I
iZacksS
01-31-2018, 03:17 AM #3

I’d suggest avoiding both options. Opt for a 3900x or if possible, a 3950x. With a 2950x, the main benefit would be additional PCIe lanes and possibly more than 128 GB RAM—features you likely won’t need for a streaming and editing PC. A Ryzen 3rd generation chip should outperform a 2950x in gaming and even editing tasks, especially with its improved cache, higher clock speeds, and officially supported DDR4 memory (up to 3600 MHz). There aren’t many upgrade paths; older Threadripper models won’t benefit much from newer processors, and new ones use different sockets. Regarding Intel, I’m unsure but expect it would be more power-hungry with fewer PCIe lanes and RAM upgrades. It probably wouldn’t tip the scales in your favor.

K
Karmageddon
Member
229
02-02-2018, 09:28 PM
#4
HEDC comes with a higher price tag overall. The 3950x 16-core consumer platform makes it clear why. Ensure you have sufficient cores for intensive editing and enough speed for gaming. Use HEDC only when you require additional PCIe lanes and more than four memory slots. With Ryzen, you can reach up to 64GB with the existing 16GB modules (four times) or 128GB if 32GB modules are available.
K
Karmageddon
02-02-2018, 09:28 PM #4

HEDC comes with a higher price tag overall. The 3950x 16-core consumer platform makes it clear why. Ensure you have sufficient cores for intensive editing and enough speed for gaming. Use HEDC only when you require additional PCIe lanes and more than four memory slots. With Ryzen, you can reach up to 64GB with the existing 16GB modules (four times) or 128GB if 32GB modules are available.

T
travelelliott
Junior Member
46
02-03-2018, 02:17 AM
#5
Check the 3950x run quad channel settings
T
travelelliott
02-03-2018, 02:17 AM #5

Check the 3950x run quad channel settings

M
Mino995
Member
103
02-03-2018, 09:46 AM
#6
Get a 3950x resolution.
M
Mino995
02-03-2018, 09:46 AM #6

Get a 3950x resolution.

C
CheezBurgerzz
Member
202
02-03-2018, 10:03 AM
#7
The Quad channel design seems promising on paper but often falls short in practice, typically improving only by a few percent. Considering the expense of building one, it doesn’t offer much value. For serious workstation needs, opting for a third-generation Threadripper would be a better choice—offering up to 64 cores and significantly more performance.
C
CheezBurgerzz
02-03-2018, 10:03 AM #7

The Quad channel design seems promising on paper but often falls short in practice, typically improving only by a few percent. Considering the expense of building one, it doesn’t offer much value. For serious workstation needs, opting for a third-generation Threadripper would be a better choice—offering up to 64 cores and significantly more performance.

C
Cutie_Kitcat
Senior Member
644
02-11-2018, 11:39 AM
#8
Sure, I've already received four 3600 units. My mobile and CPU aren't performing well.
C
Cutie_Kitcat
02-11-2018, 11:39 AM #8

Sure, I've already received four 3600 units. My mobile and CPU aren't performing well.

W
WildFlow
Member
187
02-11-2018, 12:24 PM
#9
Four sticks function well in dual channel configuration. Don't stress over channel settings—just concentrate on core quantity and GPU performance. For video editing prioritize core count, while gaming favors top-tier GPU. It's also useful to note your existing configuration and budget.
W
WildFlow
02-11-2018, 12:24 PM #9

Four sticks function well in dual channel configuration. Don't stress over channel settings—just concentrate on core quantity and GPU performance. For video editing prioritize core count, while gaming favors top-tier GPU. It's also useful to note your existing configuration and budget.

G
gmoney_1114
Junior Member
49
02-11-2018, 12:52 PM
#10
Purchase an AM4 motherboard that supports four memory slots, and the four RAM modules will operate in dual-channel configuration.
G
gmoney_1114
02-11-2018, 12:52 PM #10

Purchase an AM4 motherboard that supports four memory slots, and the four RAM modules will operate in dual-channel configuration.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next