F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 5G5 7400 not achieving 65W thermal design power

5G5 7400 not achieving 65W thermal design power

5G5 7400 not achieving 65W thermal design power

T
themazegames
Junior Member
15
03-30-2017, 05:38 AM
#1
Recently assembled a makeshift build using inexpensive eBay components. Mobo is a Z270. Paired with an i5 7400 that isn't a K-series. Benchmarking with Cinebench R23 shows only 28W, far below the advertised 65W. Performance is also mediocre, with a max of 1800MHz. Compared to others who reach the 3000s, it seems the i5 7400 isn't getting boosted to the higher end. You have good cooling and temps are low in the 40s. Throttling didn<|pad|>'s help but didn't improve power delivery.
T
themazegames
03-30-2017, 05:38 AM #1

Recently assembled a makeshift build using inexpensive eBay components. Mobo is a Z270. Paired with an i5 7400 that isn't a K-series. Benchmarking with Cinebench R23 shows only 28W, far below the advertised 65W. Performance is also mediocre, with a max of 1800MHz. Compared to others who reach the 3000s, it seems the i5 7400 isn't getting boosted to the higher end. You have good cooling and temps are low in the 40s. Throttling didn<|pad|>'s help but didn't improve power delivery.

C
coolerijk
Member
125
03-30-2017, 01:44 PM
#2
In everyday operation it should stay well below 65 with ease. Which timepieces does it synchronize? The integrated speed boost reaches 3.3 Ghz.
C
coolerijk
03-30-2017, 01:44 PM #2

In everyday operation it should stay well below 65 with ease. Which timepieces does it synchronize? The integrated speed boost reaches 3.3 Ghz.

I
iiamDracover
Junior Member
2
04-04-2017, 02:23 PM
#3
Confirmed performance at 3.3ghz works well. Cinebench shows full utilization across all cores, which suggests it should reach 65w. The 28w figure hints there might be a bottleneck elsewhere.
I
iiamDracover
04-04-2017, 02:23 PM #3

Confirmed performance at 3.3ghz works well. Cinebench shows full utilization across all cores, which suggests it should reach 65w. The 28w figure hints there might be a bottleneck elsewhere.

F
Frost9
Junior Member
16
04-18-2017, 08:19 PM
#4
In TPU's assessment of the i3-8300 they measured 34 watts during Cinebench and 42 watts in Prime 95 (for the i5-7400). These are merely low-clocked processors that require minimal power.
F
Frost9
04-18-2017, 08:19 PM #4

In TPU's assessment of the i3-8300 they measured 34 watts during Cinebench and 42 watts in Prime 95 (for the i5-7400). These are merely low-clocked processors that require minimal power.

J
jpo009
Junior Member
14
04-19-2017, 02:21 PM
#5
They're basically just pants. It's super frustrating to pay over £100 for a 7-year-old CPU.
J
jpo009
04-19-2017, 02:21 PM #5

They're basically just pants. It's super frustrating to pay over £100 for a 7-year-old CPU.

U
umizou1393
Senior Member
253
04-19-2017, 11:12 PM
#6
The 7700K definitely has more power, but it's still fine. They handle older titles well—such as GTA V—and most recent games work okay. However, they're nearing the end of their life span.
U
umizou1393
04-19-2017, 11:12 PM #6

The 7700K definitely has more power, but it's still fine. They handle older titles well—such as GTA V—and most recent games work okay. However, they're nearing the end of their life span.

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
04-21-2017, 01:12 AM
#7
The 65w TDP is a guideline for the cooler, not a strict power limit. Intel sets these values based on certain die quality expectations. Some CPUs might use less power than 35w, while others could exceed it. For the 7400 series, they likely aimed for a balance, and some dies were chosen to meet performance goals or to restrict overclocking. Occasionally, demand pushes manufacturers to use better dies, which can lower power consumption.
E
Eusebio06
04-21-2017, 01:12 AM #7

The 65w TDP is a guideline for the cooler, not a strict power limit. Intel sets these values based on certain die quality expectations. Some CPUs might use less power than 35w, while others could exceed it. For the 7400 series, they likely aimed for a balance, and some dies were chosen to meet performance goals or to restrict overclocking. Occasionally, demand pushes manufacturers to use better dies, which can lower power consumption.