F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks 50/100/200/400GbE on a budget - which NICs ?

50/100/200/400GbE on a budget - which NICs ?

50/100/200/400GbE on a budget - which NICs ?

S
Sheik1soul
Senior Member
511
09-14-2022, 02:37 PM
#1
I’m evaluating high-speed Ethernet solutions for everyday users, avoiding server hardware beyond network cards. With a 400/200/50GbE Mikrotik switch available, the focus is on compatible NICs that balance cost and performance. I understand there are existing fast NICs, but they often come with higher prices than the switch itself. Key questions: The switch supports 56G/channel signaling. Which affordable NICs can match that? While 50GbE options from older models exist, they typically advertise 28G/channel speeds. What are the most suitable low-cost NICs for 56G/channel operation? Are there current options supporting 56Gb/s speeds and PCIe5 host interfaces? Is this capability a temporary trend until 112G/channel becomes standard in data centers? At these speeds, without urgent need for Ethernet updates, is it wise to hold off on PCIe6&DDR6 developments? What realistic NIC choices exist for 200GbE and beyond? In practice, NVIDIA leads, Intel offers the E830 at a lower price, Broadcom targets smaller markets, and there are options from Chellio. Is AMD planning a more affordable entry for non-professionals? There appear to be 50GbE models using fast PCIe5 or PCIe4—ideal for budget-focused mobile devices that don’t waste lane capacity.
S
Sheik1soul
09-14-2022, 02:37 PM #1

I’m evaluating high-speed Ethernet solutions for everyday users, avoiding server hardware beyond network cards. With a 400/200/50GbE Mikrotik switch available, the focus is on compatible NICs that balance cost and performance. I understand there are existing fast NICs, but they often come with higher prices than the switch itself. Key questions: The switch supports 56G/channel signaling. Which affordable NICs can match that? While 50GbE options from older models exist, they typically advertise 28G/channel speeds. What are the most suitable low-cost NICs for 56G/channel operation? Are there current options supporting 56Gb/s speeds and PCIe5 host interfaces? Is this capability a temporary trend until 112G/channel becomes standard in data centers? At these speeds, without urgent need for Ethernet updates, is it wise to hold off on PCIe6&DDR6 developments? What realistic NIC choices exist for 200GbE and beyond? In practice, NVIDIA leads, Intel offers the E830 at a lower price, Broadcom targets smaller markets, and there are options from Chellio. Is AMD planning a more affordable entry for non-professionals? There appear to be 50GbE models using fast PCIe5 or PCIe4—ideal for budget-focused mobile devices that don’t waste lane capacity.

M
Molly_Plays
Junior Member
41
09-17-2022, 06:23 PM
#2
The question asks about the reason behind seeking fast networking equipment.
M
Molly_Plays
09-17-2022, 06:23 PM #2

The question asks about the reason behind seeking fast networking equipment.

D
Darkeos
Senior Member
538
09-26-2022, 11:33 AM
#3
A pre-release version of the film is available on the plex server before its official launch.
D
Darkeos
09-26-2022, 11:33 AM #3

A pre-release version of the film is available on the plex server before its official launch.

J
jakealumba5257
Junior Member
7
09-26-2022, 05:52 PM
#4
Do you possess devices capable of such high speeds and are you moving petabytes of information every day? If not, what’s the purpose? RAM velocity isn’t the main concern. Storage performance is what truly counts. However, purchasing these options only makes sense if you regularly handle massive data volumes. The listed speeds include 50 GbE, PCIe 4.0 x4, PCIe 5.0 x4, and more, but practical use depends on your specific needs. Unless you require full utilization of a 200 GbE link, PCIe 6.0 offers little value for everyday users soon. Beyond large file moves, the software that could use it is limited.
J
jakealumba5257
09-26-2022, 05:52 PM #4

Do you possess devices capable of such high speeds and are you moving petabytes of information every day? If not, what’s the purpose? RAM velocity isn’t the main concern. Storage performance is what truly counts. However, purchasing these options only makes sense if you regularly handle massive data volumes. The listed speeds include 50 GbE, PCIe 4.0 x4, PCIe 5.0 x4, and more, but practical use depends on your specific needs. Unless you require full utilization of a 200 GbE link, PCIe 6.0 offers little value for everyday users soon. Beyond large file moves, the software that could use it is limited.

C
ChibiWolf39
Senior Member
491
10-16-2022, 09:27 PM
#5
PCIe6x1 offers up to 50GbE, PCIe6x4 supports 200GbE, and PCIe6x8 reaches 400GbE, each with a strong buffer.
C
ChibiWolf39
10-16-2022, 09:27 PM #5

PCIe6x1 offers up to 50GbE, PCIe6x4 supports 200GbE, and PCIe6x8 reaches 400GbE, each with a strong buffer.

W
Way2Meke
Member
235
10-24-2022, 04:11 PM
#6
Of course, I agree. You also require quick storage solutions and a scenario where those speeds provide real value to justify the expense.
W
Way2Meke
10-24-2022, 04:11 PM #6

Of course, I agree. You also require quick storage solutions and a scenario where those speeds provide real value to justify the expense.

K
Kerritona
Junior Member
3
10-24-2022, 11:25 PM
#7
One M.2 PCIe5 card provides strong performance, but a typical setup with two cards can boost speeds significantly. Using high-speed modules and direct CPU connections doubles the potential bandwidth. Pairing them with fast memory like 6400MHz UDIMMs pushes the limit even higher. Despite modern Ethernet standards offering much more than 50GbE, the combination of limited physical lanes and lower network speeds often restricts real-world gains.
K
Kerritona
10-24-2022, 11:25 PM #7

One M.2 PCIe5 card provides strong performance, but a typical setup with two cards can boost speeds significantly. Using high-speed modules and direct CPU connections doubles the potential bandwidth. Pairing them with fast memory like 6400MHz UDIMMs pushes the limit even higher. Despite modern Ethernet standards offering much more than 50GbE, the combination of limited physical lanes and lower network speeds often restricts real-world gains.

G
GreatDestroyer
Junior Member
6
11-10-2022, 10:10 PM
#8
I've already reviewed those speed tests. When is it necessary to move big data volumes across the network? Otherwise, you're losing your investment.
G
GreatDestroyer
11-10-2022, 10:10 PM #8

I've already reviewed those speed tests. When is it necessary to move big data volumes across the network? Otherwise, you're losing your investment.

F
fatdad98
Member
54
11-18-2022, 08:54 PM
#9
This would be impractical since real-world scenarios don’t require moving large amounts of data over a network at those speeds. Simply backing up or transferring files from one NVMe drive to another isn’t a practical need, especially when costs are involved. People often ask what they’re trying to achieve, but the question seems more like someone searching for expensive parts online without a clear purpose.
F
fatdad98
11-18-2022, 08:54 PM #9

This would be impractical since real-world scenarios don’t require moving large amounts of data over a network at those speeds. Simply backing up or transferring files from one NVMe drive to another isn’t a practical need, especially when costs are involved. People often ask what they’re trying to achieve, but the question seems more like someone searching for expensive parts online without a clear purpose.