3800x vs 9700k
3800x vs 9700k
You're considering an upgrade for your current 4460 and are weighing between the 9700k and the 3800x. You're focusing on gaming performance, especially with titles like CS:GO, Modern Warfare, and Siege, and you plan to run Discord and Chrome alongside it. The 3800x offers more threads (8 extra), but you're unsure if that translates to noticeable benefits. Intel's performance in games is generally better, though the extra threads might not be enough to make a big difference for your setup.
You could save the change by purchasing a Ryzen 7 3700X, letting the funds fund a future GPU upgrade or additional storage as needed. The performance boost from the 3800X isn't that significant. Also, CSGO can achieve high FPS even on a weaker CPU, though I'm not sure about the other games you play. A quick reminder—didn't you hear about a new security issue on Team Blue?
They mentioned a security concern but didn’t go into details. The 3800 costs around $40 extra and offers a bit more performance per core. I’m curious about how Intel 8 vs AMD 8 16 stack up, especially since I usually prefer Intel for gaming.
I’d like to choose Intel, specifically the 9900K model. It’s pricier by at least $100, and I’m unsure if the DRP4 can manage the heat it produces.
This moment is critical. The data suggests AMD may edge ahead in the near term, though the timeline remains uncertain. The debate centers on whether future advancements will truly favor AMD or if Intel retains its lead. It’s not a simple comparison of speed; it depends on how well games and software adapt to new architectures. AMD’s extra virtual cores could give it an edge in certain scenarios, especially for non-gaming applications. However, the trend hints at challenges—similar to what single-core processors faced with increased complexity. If this pattern holds, Intel might struggle to keep up, just as 5GHz CPUs once did despite their speed. Some argue against these predictions, but personal experience suggests caution. For those with limited cooling capacity, I’d recommend opting for the 9900k and reducing its clock speed if necessary.
You're focusing on performance beyond just hitting low frame rates in competitive titles. Instead of constantly upgrading your hardware yearly, investing in a 3700 or 3800x 9700k setup is valuable. A compatible motherboard like B450 or X570 offers better support for next-generation systems, which can improve efficiency even if FPS isn't significantly higher. For streaming or work tasks, newer consoles like the PS5 and Xbox now rely heavily on multi-core processors with high thread counts. The shift is moving toward more cores and threads rather than just clock speed, so optimizing for performance through architecture matters more now than ever.
I agree. Not everyone shares the same view. I had a pretty intense discussion about it yesterday.
individuals strive to justify their investments and form strong connections with the devices they purchase. people are reluctant to acknowledge concerns like "8 threads might not suffice in two years," whereas more likely worries arise such as "4GHz isn't sufficient." it's unlikely anyone will create games for a future that seems distant (6,7,8G CPUs).
Strongly align with @Otto_iii, LGA1151-2 will be outdated by early next year, and the platform cap remains around 9700K. Choosing a solid AM4 board now means you’ll benefit from a big jump later—switching to something like 3600-3700X or Ryzen 4xxx models when they arrive will make it even more impressive. By the way, my setup has 9700K and 8700K; 9700K consistently performs better across all tests. The only advantage of 8700K is its liquid metal cooling, which keeps it competitive.