F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 3600MHZ RAM for B450 Tomahawk and Ryzen 3000 processor

3600MHZ RAM for B450 Tomahawk and Ryzen 3000 processor

3600MHZ RAM for B450 Tomahawk and Ryzen 3000 processor

B
bear7001
Senior Member
Find
448
02-03-2019, 03:55 PM
#1
Olá! Estou bem com o sistema atual (Ryzen 3700X), mas algumas despesas surgiram e estou considerando atualizar a RAM. Estou analisando dois modelos nas links fornecidos. Minha principal preocupação é se o B450 Tomahawk (não max) + 3700MHz funcionará bem com um RAM de 3600MHz. No site da MSI, diz que suporta até 3466MHZ (OC), mas acho que isso se aplique principalmente aos primeiros e segundos gerações do Ryzen com atualização BIOS para a terceira geração. O site G-Skill indica que os Neo Tridentz são para Ryzen 3000 em placas X570. Se for o caso, tudo deve funcionar normalmente. Qual opção você prefere? Crucial Ballistx é mais barato, mas já tenho experiência com as memórias da G-Skill.
Reply
Reply
B
bear7001
02-03-2019, 03:55 PM #1

Olá! Estou bem com o sistema atual (Ryzen 3700X), mas algumas despesas surgiram e estou considerando atualizar a RAM. Estou analisando dois modelos nas links fornecidos. Minha principal preocupação é se o B450 Tomahawk (não max) + 3700MHz funcionará bem com um RAM de 3600MHz. No site da MSI, diz que suporta até 3466MHZ (OC), mas acho que isso se aplique principalmente aos primeiros e segundos gerações do Ryzen com atualização BIOS para a terceira geração. O site G-Skill indica que os Neo Tridentz são para Ryzen 3000 em placas X570. Se for o caso, tudo deve funcionar normalmente. Qual opção você prefere? Crucial Ballistx é mais barato, mas já tenho experiência com as memórias da G-Skill.

Reply
Reply
R
rboy108
Member
Find
166
02-09-2019, 09:17 PM
#2
From what I understand, tomahawk doesn't require a maximum of 3465MHz for RAM. It's not necessary to pin it down at that frequency.
Reply
Reply
R
rboy108
02-09-2019, 09:17 PM #2

From what I understand, tomahawk doesn't require a maximum of 3465MHz for RAM. It's not necessary to pin it down at that frequency.

Reply
Reply
T
taconiebre
Senior Member
Find
506
02-16-2019, 12:13 AM
#3
It matches what MSI states online, though I think it could be linked to issues from the first and second generation Ryzen models.
Reply
Reply
T
taconiebre
02-16-2019, 12:13 AM #3

It matches what MSI states online, though I think it could be linked to issues from the first and second generation Ryzen models.

Reply
Reply
U
UberBR
Junior Member
Find
49
02-16-2019, 03:58 AM
#4
It stays the same board. The latest update for Zen 2 is the 'max' range. Probably the non-max version stays at 3466. It might also relate to a B450 chipset (just a guess).
Reply
Reply
U
UberBR
02-16-2019, 03:58 AM #4

It stays the same board. The latest update for Zen 2 is the 'max' range. Probably the non-max version stays at 3466. It might also relate to a B450 chipset (just a guess).

Reply
Reply
R
Raidex20
Posting Freak
Find
751
02-16-2019, 12:07 PM
#5
After checking various forums and the MSI website, I managed to figure out the answer. The memory controller is now built into the CPU, which sets the memory speed limits. For the B450 Tomahawk (non-max), you can find a list of compatible RAMs, including GSKILL options, but crucial ballistic chips aren't recommended. Likely, sticking with GSKILL would be best.
Reply
Reply
R
Raidex20
02-16-2019, 12:07 PM #5

After checking various forums and the MSI website, I managed to figure out the answer. The memory controller is now built into the CPU, which sets the memory speed limits. For the B450 Tomahawk (non-max), you can find a list of compatible RAMs, including GSKILL options, but crucial ballistic chips aren't recommended. Likely, sticking with GSKILL would be best.

Reply
Reply