F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 3600 VS 3600x

3600 VS 3600x

3600 VS 3600x

C
cowcow4321
Senior Member
623
10-14-2019, 06:31 PM
#1
I understand the distinctions between the r5 3600 and r5 3600x, but I've heard that for serious CPU overclocking beyond standard speeds, a Ryzen X series chip might be better. Would it be more effective to overclock the 3600x compared to the 3600, or would the results be similar? And if overclocking an X series processor is easier, does that mean the same applies to the 3700x since it doesn't exist?
C
cowcow4321
10-14-2019, 06:31 PM #1

I understand the distinctions between the r5 3600 and r5 3600x, but I've heard that for serious CPU overclocking beyond standard speeds, a Ryzen X series chip might be better. Would it be more effective to overclock the 3600x compared to the 3600, or would the results be similar? And if overclocking an X series processor is easier, does that mean the same applies to the 3700x since it doesn't exist?

C
coronahh
Junior Member
12
10-14-2019, 06:53 PM
#2
Ryzen offers minimal overclocking potential from the beginning, so it's usually best not to try and just rely on PBO. Although the 3600x might be a better choice in terms of binning, any improvement would only be around 100-200mhz (2-5%).
C
coronahh
10-14-2019, 06:53 PM #2

Ryzen offers minimal overclocking potential from the beginning, so it's usually best not to try and just rely on PBO. Although the 3600x might be a better choice in terms of binning, any improvement would only be around 100-200mhz (2-5%).

D
DollynhoBr123
Member
73
10-15-2019, 01:51 AM
#3
Ryzen offers minimal overclocking potential from the beginning, so it's usually best not to try and just rely on PBO. Although the 3600x might be a better chip in terms of binning, any improvement would only be around 100-200mhz (2-5%), which is quite small.
D
DollynhoBr123
10-15-2019, 01:51 AM #3

Ryzen offers minimal overclocking potential from the beginning, so it's usually best not to try and just rely on PBO. Although the 3600x might be a better chip in terms of binning, any improvement would only be around 100-200mhz (2-5%), which is quite small.

Z
ZzeoTexX
Member
238
10-15-2019, 04:46 AM
#4
Ok thank you.
Z
ZzeoTexX
10-15-2019, 04:46 AM #4

Ok thank you.

S
Sanhwa
Member
53
10-16-2019, 08:34 AM
#5
As previously mentioned, performance-wise at pbo boosts can push the 3600x to reach up to 300mhz at the best. Pbo generally performs as well or better than any manual overclocking method. The advantage of the 3600x lies in its inclusion of the full-size wraith, unlike the wraith stealth version. It offers a more straightforward cooler design; if you intend to use the stock cooler, the 3600x might be worth considering if it's reasonably priced. Most users (including myself) would opt for the standard 3600 and an aftermarket 120mm+ tower, though it should cost about the same or around $10 more, making it a more practical choice.
S
Sanhwa
10-16-2019, 08:34 AM #5

As previously mentioned, performance-wise at pbo boosts can push the 3600x to reach up to 300mhz at the best. Pbo generally performs as well or better than any manual overclocking method. The advantage of the 3600x lies in its inclusion of the full-size wraith, unlike the wraith stealth version. It offers a more straightforward cooler design; if you intend to use the stock cooler, the 3600x might be worth considering if it's reasonably priced. Most users (including myself) would opt for the standard 3600 and an aftermarket 120mm+ tower, though it should cost about the same or around $10 more, making it a more practical choice.

I
Infinity_PvPs
Member
205
10-16-2019, 03:12 PM
#6
Ryzens adheres strongly to their power boundaries. The 3600 is a 65w CPU with an 88w cap, allowing a noticeable 23w boost. The 3600X features a 95w CPU and a 104w limit, offering a massive 9w difference in boost potential.

If you prefer straightforward use without modifications, the 3600X is ideal. For those seeking cost savings and some flexibility, the 3600 remains the superior choice.
I
Infinity_PvPs
10-16-2019, 03:12 PM #6

Ryzens adheres strongly to their power boundaries. The 3600 is a 65w CPU with an 88w cap, allowing a noticeable 23w boost. The 3600X features a 95w CPU and a 104w limit, offering a massive 9w difference in boost potential.

If you prefer straightforward use without modifications, the 3600X is ideal. For those seeking cost savings and some flexibility, the 3600 remains the superior choice.

I
ille200306
Member
159
10-26-2019, 11:01 PM
#7
the r5 3600x includes a 5% boost in clock speed and an improved cooler. in games, it should offer a performance gain of 1 to 3 fps. if you're looking to save money, the r5 3600 is a smart option... if you have $35 extra for a slight performance boost, then this model is worth considering.
I
ille200306
10-26-2019, 11:01 PM #7

the r5 3600x includes a 5% boost in clock speed and an improved cooler. in games, it should offer a performance gain of 1 to 3 fps. if you're looking to save money, the r5 3600 is a smart option... if you have $35 extra for a slight performance boost, then this model is worth considering.

J
Jenuax
Member
174
10-30-2019, 12:11 AM
#8
Additional comments suggest the 3600XT offers even greater 'margin' compared to previous models, though proving its value remains challenging. The XT chips represent the highest-end silicon, but the cost-benefit analysis is tougher than ever. While AMD has improved their boosting algorithm significantly, the gains from higher clock speeds are minimal. The Ryzen 5 3600XT continues to be a solid choice.
J
Jenuax
10-30-2019, 12:11 AM #8

Additional comments suggest the 3600XT offers even greater 'margin' compared to previous models, though proving its value remains challenging. The XT chips represent the highest-end silicon, but the cost-benefit analysis is tougher than ever. While AMD has improved their boosting algorithm significantly, the gains from higher clock speeds are minimal. The Ryzen 5 3600XT continues to be a solid choice.