24 processors running at 1.8 GHz compared to 28 cores at 1.5 GHz
24 processors running at 1.8 GHz compared to 28 cores at 1.5 GHz
I just received a free ASUS WS C621E Sage for my homelab/render setup for Arnold and Maya. I need engineering CPUs because I can't afford QS chips. I also need to purchase it immediately since Linus posted the cheap 3647 Xeon video yesterday, and they’ll be gone soon—just like with the 2066 models before. I could get roughly the same price with two 8160s @ 24c or two 8176s @ 28c. I’m okay with ES CPUs but still unsure which of these two to choose.
Pursue the 8160 series. Unless it's essential for significantly more cores across all tasks (especially heavy multitasking), a system with 24 cores at a higher speed will suffice. For those requiring additional cores and cache, opt for the alternative option.
The issue is that using an ES CPU makes performance drop significantly. The cost comparison depends on the setup; a dual 8160 with full scaling would only be about 30% faster than a 5950x. Most ES models run much slower, so the 5950x is likely much more efficient. ES boards usually cost between $250–300 each, and selling them can offset the expense of a 5950x + Xeon system. Don’t forget the additional cooling and power supply costs. If you must choose, opt for a standard 5950x instead—it offers better performance and value.
It seemed like something was happening, indicating the alternatives are superior. The main consideration should be the cost relative to what you have. If money isn’t a constraint, the 8176 would be the best choice.
I checked my surroundings and discovered the 8160 es samples reach around 2ghz (the more affordable ones). These samples can't be sold if you were the one who made the deal with Intel. The board op would cost a lot of money, and spending 4-600 on this setup with slower CPUs would be outmatched by a comparable 5950x configuration.